If the person is not good looking at all, a well done artistic tattoo can make them look better.
Otherwise, the tattoos usually look bad. |
Totally disagree. The best tattoos are visible and legible and are just art for the sake of art. They have no personal meaning |
I like them. |
Trashy. Double so if they also smell skunky from smoking weed. |
Please, explain to me how these aren't art. It may not be your preferred style of art, but these are pieces of art on someone's body. Imagine how incredible it feels to modify your body into a living piece of art
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Either I don’t think you read that right or I don’t understand what you mean by saying it’s a stupid comment. PPs point was that many veterans have ink, not that they all do. |
I like them on men who are already fit and attractive. There are definitely cases where it would even increase my attraction.
|
The best tattoo ever was the Woody Woodpecker on H I McDonough.
Knows very few will get that reference. |
Not a fan. They seem mostly MAGA to me. |
Trashy and lame
|
Somehow there are still some comments that can surprise me with their sheer level of ignorance. I keep thinking I’ve seem it all but then BLAM! |
Right! You'll see more tattoos in Portland, OR then in Montana |
Some are cool looking. Very few. Most are ugly. They are always trashy though. |
Your body is a living piece of art. |
. . . .that resembles a tacky T-shirt design from "Hot Topic" or (for the old---"Spencer's Gifts"). Though, to be honest, I prefer these vs. the random scattered ones (thinking of the Miley Cyrus video I just saw) that look like the person got attacked by a 5 year old with a sticker book . . . . |