No one can ever know when you put it like that. So what's your answer? |
Gravity. It had to have existed before the big bang, or the big bang couldn't have happened. |
The Big Bang together with complex human consciousness that lends itself towards seeking moral order that cannot be explained away by evolution (although I do believe in evolution) lead me to believe in the existence of a loving God/ divine mystery that transcends time and space. |
Gravity requires mass to exist |
Shows what you know. We were taught that the priest converts bread and wine to LITERALLY the body and blood of Jesus. |
I don't know what you're trying to say, but everything released in the big bang existed before the big bang. It wasn't created by the big bang |
I am not aware of any Catholics or Episcopalians who interpret the Eucharist as anything other than symbolic … |
Did you actually read it? It was written by a Catholic scholar. Anyway, the Eucharist is a Catholic belief, even if most Catholics don't necessarily believe it anymore. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/05/transubstantiation-eucharist-u-s-catholics/ "Transubstantiation – the idea that during Mass, the bread and wine used for Communion become the body and blood of Jesus Christ – is central to the Catholic faith. Indeed, the Catholic Church teaches that “the Eucharist is ‘the source and summit of the Christian life.’” But a new Pew Research Center survey finds that most self-described Catholics don’t believe this core teaching. In fact, nearly seven-in-ten Catholics (69%) say they personally believe that during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine used in Communion “are symbols of the body and blood of Jesus Christ.” Just one-third of U.S. Catholics (31%) say they believe that “during Catholic Mass, the bread and wine actually become the body and blood of Jesus.”" |
That is not the theory … |
Well, those are two very different things. Mystery yes, but if everything had to be created what created God? (I think we all know the answer to that one). |
We don't know specifically what they believed, but they believed in something beyond death/supernatural. |
Yes it is. |
This is exactly how religions started. A way to explain the mysteries of nature. |
There is no consensus on that point … The theory (and scientific theory is not the same as social science theory but requires enormous evidence and consensus to gain traction) - the universe began as just a single point, then expanded and stretched to grow as large as it is right now—and it is still stretching! However, this allows room for many questions about the single point even if we accept the more recent theory of the process for before the Big Bang - see prior post on this. |
You have proved that you did not read the post you are responding. You have no evidence that there was anything before the Big Bang. You are making a gigantic presupposition. A bunch of them in fact, because you are assuming that there was a “before’ , that it had a cause, and that that cause was supernatural and you have no reason or evidence for any of those claims. The Big Bang might be the beginning of time. It’s OK to say we don’t know yet. Because we don’t know yet. |