+1. I can’t believe parents don’t get this. If DCPS can’t manage fighting and behavior issues in the classroom, you think things are going to change at the new high school where kids are older, bigger, and bolder? Also if families don’t buy into the new high school, the problem is going to get worst with more OOB kids. |
You're right. Three years in MS is just not long enough to see the changes in funding that we're told are happening. So unless you have multiple kids attending, spread across some years, it's not easy to get motivated to look into it or protest. I do know that a fantastic advanced math self-paced online program, ALEKS, was abruptly (to us) dropped one weekend at the end of September because no longer funded. Classes that used it had to shift that part of the work/homework to a much less sophisticated program that students don't like (euphemism). |
What we're telling you, though, is that the school administration is on top of it and working through it with all students, that many students are unaffected and barely aware it's going on, and that for now the families are on-board with MacArthur. It's like you're trying to manufacture drama. |
It's like you are a PR firm. You (plural, as you oddly described yourself) have a viewpoint. So do all the rest of us! From my DC's vantage point, the problems have gotten worse over the course of the year, and my DC is affected by it and hates school because if it. It's sweet that you want me to just trust that the administration is on top of it, but I've seen nothing that demonstrates that Meanwhile, my DC may well end up at Macarthur because we can't afford private. And I wanted to be excited about the new, smaller high school, but DCPS's feeble planning process has not inspired confidence. So sure, if that counts as "on-board with Macarthur," then go ahead and keeping insisting that you speak for everyone. ! |
Are you for real? You think the school is actually on top of it when the problem is escalating, getting worst, and kids are injured?? What planet are you living on? |
+1. Not a Hardy parent, but what I’ve learned at our elementary with increasingly bad behavior/violence is that some kids (like my DS) are not impacted and others are, very much so. Since my DS tends to be a trouble maker himself, in some ways the chaos works out for him because his behavior is more normal or even better. But as a parent that doesn’t make me any happier than you. I don’t want his behavior to get worse - he could get really hurt, for one - and I want him to, you know, actually learn a bunch. |
No idea. Mine doesn’t change either but has had no PE due to locked locker rooms since school started back up. Also, a block of ~30 minutes once a week for either orchestra or band that meets either during your lunch or during your advisory period does not a music program make, regardless of much I like the band teacher, who is great. That’s basically less than a club level of participation in music of any kind and was solely dependent on the child deciding to take up an instrument or continue one they already play, it’s not a universal across the board program for all students. Maybe other people’s kids have stopped mentioning the fights because it’s so routine? My child finds it pretty disturbing that fights happen daily or more and I hear about it at least 3 times a week. There are also locked bathrooms and regular pleas to parents to tell our kids to stop defacing the bathrooms. |
|
I can speak to several of the points here. Hardy does not equal Macarthur. I have limited confidence in the Hardy administration's ability to get on top of existing issues in the school. I have no hesitancy believing that another administration could suitably handle the situation. Thus, the same kids and the same behaviors could produce two completely different environments depending on the ability of the administration to deal with it. I don't presume the same behaviors will continue at Macarthur simply because they're present currently at Hardy, but even if they did, I see no reason to expect the inadequate and lackluster response.
As to PE, the boys often don't change from their school colors while the girls generally do change out of the school attire. The PE teacher permits the boys to perform PE in their school attire but he does not permit the girls to do so. In general, girls are treated differently than boys in PE and there is absolutely, positively no defensible reason for it. |
| To the point above, my daughter says the gym teacher is a misogynist and treats the girls like crap. What is that about?!? |
There's no actual band or orchestra class? What? Why not? I visited an MCPS MS and heard the advanced orchestra - they sounded amazing. |
Um sorry. This doesn't answer the question about lack of music and art, and it also inspires zero confidence in DCPS overall. |
No. They meet either as beginners, intermediate, or advanced depending on how long the child has played an instrument and it is one day a week either during the advisory or lunch period. Those are 30 minute blocks. I played in orchestra starting in elementary school, and by middle school it was a regular daily class. Once a week would amount to nothing by the time the kids arrive and get their instruments ready to play. The band teacher is really awesome, I wish my child could be in a normal length class with him daily to improve instrument skills further. We pay for private lessons too, but can only swing the cost/time once a week. |
This is really sad. Is it just Hardy or all MS? |
|
Hardy has a good music program until this year. Pre-Covid, a jazz orchestra and some other combo would play at the open houses, abd they were excellent.
But Hardy used to have more OOB. It still has OOB, but they all come from the feeder schools. Maybe this is why DCPS decided to screw over the school budget-wise. |
* had, not has |