Pretty sure there’s more to it than simply “not caring.” |
Pretty sure you're right, but some don't care enough to take the blinders off. |
There are two ways to eliminate the achievement gap; make everything so easy that everyone passes, or make everything so hard that everyone fails. Obviously only the first is viable, so that’s where we’re going. |
As an MCPS parent, it seems pretty clear that this is the path that MCPS is choosing. It is discouraging and does all kids a disservice to lower expectations. And it’s unfortunate, because it pushes some families out of the public school system. Which, in turn, weakens the school system as a whole. |
From what I've seen, on-level Math classes are still offered in high school, as well as honors. |
Newton MA public school system and MCPS are really very different. I just don't think you can compare them. There is no achievement gap to close in Newton, MA. In fact they bus in 400 poor kids from Boston just to have some diversity. It's pretty easy to see how 20 years later the demographic story of MCPS (and FCPS, a little behind us) has played out. MCPS in its current demographic incarnation will never be like a wealthy community that has independent school districts by town. It is interesting to look at some of their data side by side. FARMS MCPS: 39.8% Newton: 18% ELL: MCPS: 18% Newton: 6% Special Ed services: * just based on my own relatives MA seems to have more [free] testing through the schools for learning differences MCPS: 12.3% Newton: 17% Newton also seems to have smaller schools period. They have 5,041 ES school students with 15 elementary schools. That is only 336 kids per elementary school. We have giant schools in comparison. MCPS has 72,300 kids in 136 elementary schools. That is 531 per school. You would think with larger schools we'd be able to offer more levels of classes, but that is not the way it panned out. I do know that honors for all has been discussed at the highschool level for quite a while (well before COVID). My own experience with this is at BCC, but I know that some classes would have both honors level and regular level kids in the same classroom, but, the levels of effort were not really that different. So teachers felt it was quite unfair that the kids who had the "honors" designation were getting the 5 point gpa boost. While the "regular" kids in the same classroom weren't. It also frequently played out that the "regular" kids were generally browner than the honors kids. |
I would be interested in hearing more English teachers' perspectives on how these combined classrooms are working. |
They are not. First off, class sizes are too large. It’s impossible to provide meaningful feedback on assignments. And the mixed-ability classrooms make it very hard to offer appropriate differentiation. |
Exactly. This isn’t good for any of the kids. |
How many low-income families of color do you personally know well enough to gauge their priorities? |
Are you an English teacher? Who is making these decisions--is it a school-level determination, or something mandated by central office? |
| This is why we supplement. No finals. Only one level offered. Kids who are above grade level are left behind. Probably kids at grade level too. |
Nobody said low-income families of color have different priorities. Many UMC white families value sports more than academics. People just value different things. |
Quite a number of schools in the country do AP Lang for all. I am teaching Lang this year and on the AP Teachers FB Group, folks report kids who read at the 5th grade level, etc. Most of these teachers will move through the curriculum, but have no expectations that the majority of their kids will pass the exam. Another way to cloud the college applications... |
If Newton is more homogenous then they should do better than MCPS with “honors for all.” MCPS is the school system that needs more, not less, differentiation in levels to meet the range of ability levels. Yet the opposite is happening. |