What you mean is that YOU won’t want to live here. And frankly that’s perfectly fine with the rest of us. |
Let me guess: You have no idea what a mortgage is. |
I like this better than people freezing to death or dying of heatstroke. |
Maybe because you're looking at them as people? It makes a difference. |
Really? Everyone in DC pays cash for real estate? |
I wish I didn’t! But am counting my blessings after one too many bidding wars going up against all-cash offers. |
Yeah, but those of us who actually live and work here don’t really need a bunch of developers or Rupert’s media to be trying to telling us that what we can see with our own eyes is not really true. |
What is the city government supposed to do to get workers back in empty offices, exactly? |
DP. I'm fine with raising taxes further to pay for more services, and our household is in the third-highest D.C. income tax bracket. If you want to give a break to the people in the $500,000 to $1 million and $1 million and above brackets, I'd even be fine with only raising taxes on my bracket. |
My property tax assessment is well below what Zillow, Redfin, etc., say I could get for selling my house. It's also well below what comps in my neighborhood have sold for just in the last month. I don't have any reason to contest my property tax bill; I believe in paying my fair share of taxes. |
Tony Williams was a great mayor (except the one time he forgot to qualify for the ballot properly, whoops!), but he's now the executive director of a powerful lobbying organization for real estate developers, bankers, and other business leaders, and he wrote that letter under the group's auspices. Obviously, that doesn't make him automatically wrong, but it does mean he's speaking for a particular set of interests here, not just chiming in out of civic virtue and love for the city. (One of the things the letter is doing is trying to advocate for lower commercial property tax rates! Though it suggests it's not really doing that.) The members of that group also have a vested interest in getting people back downtown 100 percent of the time, partly because many of the members are collecting rents on offices. So I take Tony's views here for as far as they go -- there is reason to worry about what would happen if downtown really stayed emptied out for good, and there are potential fiscal issues ahead. But at the same time, I don't think the fact that a bunch of property owners are concerned about how they can appeal their tax assessments means that, for instance, the city can't afford to make bus service free. |
Truth. |
They have shelters to go to. It's a lie there's no room. They want everyone to feel sorry for them and hand they the golden ticket for a free apartment for life rhat costs more than what the average working and law abiding citizen could afford. The free bus is another perceived entitlement at someone elses expense. If these people can’t take care of themselves, they can check into St. Elizabeth's. |
The DHS facility at the west side of St. Elizabeth’s or the construction site on the east side of St. Elizabeth’s? Good job signaling that you have absolutely no idea about the current state of the city. |
NO to free bus. YES to new build for permanent institutionalization (forced to all street people). |