Forum Index
»
Schools and Education General Discussion
All of the above. Principals have some discretion, but a lot of the busy work comes from the top. Tell your friends to write letters. When I first started teaching, my planning was my time. When I left about a decade later, I had two compulsory meetings a week, but no less work. |
Did someone suggest that the school fix it? No. All someone suggested was that ignoring it wouldn't fix it. |
DP, but what is your solution then? This thread is about solutions, and all you are doing is saying "No." Is your solution just harping on anonymous message boards that parents are bad? |
But I do wonder if charters can do things differently that a huge district can't do. For example, they can have different administrative burdens on teachers, they can 'counsel out' behavior kids, etc. Those are things that teachers on this board have expressed that they want. So it seems that charters (and privates, for that matter) can solve some of the issues where districts can't. |
| So, the solution is more charters and private schools? |
| By the way, private schools absolutely have tracking and personalized instruction. Parents want that. |
Wait, so you suggest adding more requirements to teachers' workloads? My kids have had teachers who are great with technology, and teachers who don't use the Schoology or Google Classroom at all. Teachers' tech skills have no relationship whatsoever to their teaching skills. Actually, I think there might be a slight inverse relationship. And since there is broad agreement that virtual learning was a failure for the vast majority of students, why insist that all teachers develop that skill set? For those for whom virtual learning works, great. They should match up with one of the many, many virtual school options. But for goodness' sake, don't add yet another requirement, especially for something of very limited value, to teachers' workloads! |
In a way, yes. If public non-charters can't provide differentiation, and have to work with behavior-issue kids, then the solution might be public charters and privates. Pay the public non-charter teachers more money, and provide a bunch of resources to them for social workers and remediation. But let the teachers and families who don't want that to have a different option. |
NP. I don't think you understand how this works. You need teachers more than they need the job. When it comes down to brass tacks, you have to court them, not the reverse. You can't chain people to the job and force them to teach. You need teachers, but they need "a job" or "support," and there are a lot of other ways of getting a job or support. The more you drag this out and try to punish teachers, the harder it is going to be to sweeten it enough to get what you need. I mean, you can do that, but it's an exercise in counterproductivity. |
Teachers are out there; they just don’t want to work under the current conditions, one of which (at least in this area) is large class sizes. If you build it, they will come. |
And that’s how you know schools aren’t interested in improving their relationship with parents. How do you think that will work out for them long-term? Will ignoring, or at times even attacking, parents lead to more public school funding? Will it improve the public’s perception of public school teachers, making it a more respectable profession? |
This hurts parents and the children more than anyone else. In the end, that's where the price is paid. People can move on to other jobs, but parents will still be parents, and their children will still need schooling. Private schools can mitigate this somewhat, but that's no final answer. |
|
Most of the solutions here just expect schools to fix society’s problems. Solutions:
-Pay teachers more to stem the immediate threat of lack of staff. -Hold kids and parents accountable. Seriously, kids and parents have become master manipulators to avoid consequences. -Get rid of SEL, most non-data driven initiatives. Most teachers don’t believe in them and view them as a distraction. Longitudinal studies are finally coming out that schools can’t teach this stuff well enough to have any impact. -Get rid of 50% rules. Parents wonder why their kid isn’t doing work yet still passes classes. -Put pressure on corporations and govt to increase salaries. The major driver of the educational issues is poverty. |
What do you mean by holding parents accountable? |
I’m talking about older kids. Sorry, but you can’t gaslight kids who were middle school and above the way you gaslit the little kids. They are old enough to form their own opinions. And for a lot of the high school and college students, they’ll never recover educationally, especially the most vulnerable of them. Talk to college professors. Trust is completely broken. Current college kids are suspicious and angry. They don’t trust any of their professors. Many have dropped out permanently. It’s grim, and your minimization of the situation because you did preschool homeschool in your Potomac mansion during the pandemic doesn’t change reality. |