Agree Duke probably isn't 1A yet but it's right there, probably on the borderline with Caltech and Penn. Disagree about UF and UCSD, check the Reddit post, both schools do well on a variety of rankings. |
|
|
Most of the 13 rankings don't have wide circulation or almost any public acceptance, so it honestly doesn't matter. We could add in 5 of the reranked lists from this thread, which would make 18 rankings. Would that be even fairer than the fairest way of doing things? |
|
1. The school that was a great fit for my kid and accepted him with generous merit money.
2-50 any random list. |
+1 all the information is on there, very informative and concise. I'm using it as a guide for my DS; It even helps summarize which rankings focus on what thinks to help decide which ones to pay more attention to. |
| Height of DCUM inanity. |
I kind of agree, I looked at the Reddit post and I would say probably 8 of the 13 rankings that were used are actually valuable based on their methodologies and circulation: US News, WSJ/THE, Forbes, Niche, Washington Monthly, Money, Wallet Hub, and Degree Choices. I think the other 5 probably don't need to be considered much and are a bit redundant. Still, even taking out those 5 rankings the overall numbers don't change much. MIT is still #1 by a good margin, the top 6 are still MIT/Stanford/Princeton/Harvard/Duke/Yale by a good margin, Penn/Caltech/Columbia/Northwestern are next up, and Rice/Dartmouth/UChicago/Brown/Cornell round out the top private schools. I think the main difference is some of the best public schools go up more, like UMich, UCLA, and Berkeley. |
Wouldn't it be amazing if there was just 1 publication that had by far the largest American rankings circulation ?
If there was such a list (or 2), would the methodology of other lists that are rarely used really even matter? Pushing that publisher to make meaningful updates to their methodology might be far more important... |
MIT is just not the best school in the US by any margin. The Kochs would need to donate a ton more for that to happen! |
My only adjustment would be to move Duke down to 1B with its peer group. 1A) MIT, Stanford, Princeton, Harvard, Yale 1B) Penn, Caltech, Columbia, Northwestern, Duke 2A) Vanderbilt, Rice, Dartmouth, Brown, UChicago, Cornell, Williams, Amherst, Pomona 2B) UMich, Johns Hopkins, WashU, Notre Dame, Georgetown, UCLA, Berkeley, Swarthmore, Bowdoin, Claremont McKenna 3A) UVA, UNC, CMU, UF, Emory, USC, Georgia Tech, Wellesley, Barnard, Carleton, Middlebury 3B) UCSD, BC, UT Austin, W&M, UIUC, W&L, Vassar, Davidson, Hamilton, Haverford |
|
|
Tier 1: Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Cal Tech, MIT
Tier 2: Chicago, UPenn, Johns Hopkins, Duke, Northwestern, Columbia Tier 3: Cornell, Brown, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Vanderbilt, Rice, Dartmouth, WUSTL, CMU, Emory, Georgetown, USC Tier 4: Michigan, Notre Dame, NYU, UVA, UNC, UCSD, BC, UT Austin, UW Madison, BU, UIUC, Georgia Tech, Ohio State, Texas A&M, University of Washington-Seattle |
No association with Middlebury (or Williams). Not pushing any agenda. Just curious as I think Princeton Review has some interesting information. |
Great point. How silly is it to ask students. We should ask administrators who know nothing about other schools to rate them. That would be much better. |