I really like Camilla

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Genuine question, but why do people dislike Meghan and Harry so much? It’s completely unfounded.

Huh? Meghan is a horrible bully who has isolated her own family, has few friends (remember Jessica Mulroney?) and shown repeatedly what a terrible person she is. She has now successfully isolated Harry from his brother, his friends and his family. She has shown complete disregard for the Queen. She has been caught in lie after lie.

There's a reason why they have been publicly booed for years.

These are all based off tabloid rumors and conspiracies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hmmm

https://pagesix.com/2022/07/21/camilla-parker-bowles-may-be-why-harry-meghan-left-uk-book/

Camilla Parker Bowles allegedly joked if Meghan, Harry’s baby would have ‘ginger Afro hair’

Here’s the thing: the only reason this is considered racist is because we have internalized the idea that an “Afro” is bad hair, out of the bounds of polite society and almost a joke. If Camilla was black, no one would consider it odd for her to be musing about what features a biracial step- grandchild might inherit from their parents. Any discussion of possible African features would be considered racist because she is white. Lots of internalized hate (and not surprising given our nation’s history) triggered Meghan and she was outraged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dignified” my ass. Sorry, op.

+1. do you not know how she messed up Charles and Diana's relationship from the beginning? The cufflinks? Not staying away? The tampon stuff?
“

Charles messed up his marriage. Why is Camilla to blame? If it was t Camilla, it would have been someone else because he clearly never had feelings for Diana and admitted so to the press. Diana wasn’t the perfect wife either and her antics didn’t help with her relationship with Charles. All three of them have some blame in the breakup of Charles and Diana but Camilla has the least.

DP but the whole point of this thread is how dignified and awesome Camilla is. She carried on an extramarital affair for, what, decades? That's lousy, not least being because she was married to someone else, too. I'm not sure what's likable about her behavior.

Exactly! She is a terrible person. By extension, she is partially responsible for Diana's death.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dignified” my ass. Sorry, op.

+1. do you not know how she messed up Charles and Diana's relationship from the beginning? The cufflinks? Not staying away? The tampon stuff?
“

Charles messed up his marriage. Why is Camilla to blame? If it was t Camilla, it would have been someone else because he clearly never had feelings for Diana and admitted so to the press. Diana wasn’t the perfect wife either and her antics didn’t help with her relationship with Charles. All three of them have some blame in the breakup of Charles and Diana but Camilla has the least.

DP but the whole point of this thread is how dignified and awesome Camilla is. She carried on an extramarital affair for, what, decades? That's lousy, not least being because she was married to someone else, too. I'm not sure what's likable about her behavior.

Exactly! She is a terrible person. By extension, she is partially responsible for Diana's death.

It was also a horrible thing to put her own family through. Her kids getting teased at school because mommy is cheating on daddy with a prince under a huge spotlight. Her son used drugs for a while-not sure if he’s cleaned up since…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d say that! After reading The Palace Papers and reflecting on how quiet and dignified she’s been, and how she seems just a little bit devilish, enough to be fun, I think she seems like a nice person.

Didn’t that book feel a touch too sympathetic to the Windsors? I’ve already returned it to the library, so I can’t quote anything, but I got the feeling that it was very strongly pushing the narrative of relatable wives from healthy families v. pitiable wives from broken homes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, she conducted an extramarital affair for, what, decades? That's not nice.

Right, both parties were married.

“Nice?”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dignified” my ass. Sorry, op.

+1. do you not know how she messed up Charles and Diana's relationship from the beginning? The cufflinks? Not staying away? The tampon stuff?
“

Charles messed up his marriage. Why is Camilla to blame? If it was t Camilla, it would have been someone else because he clearly never had feelings for Diana and admitted so to the press. Diana wasn’t the perfect wife either and her antics didn’t help with her relationship with Charles. All three of them have some blame in the breakup of Charles and Diana but Camilla has the least.

As soon as one of them were married, it should have ended. Period.
Would you expect less from your spouse? The father of your children?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate her. But I’m Harry’s age, lost my mother suddenly about the same time, and also had my dad immediately get together with his Camilla type, so I fully admit I am as damaged and angry as Harry clearly is. The whole drama with Harry’s attitude toward Camilla really showed me, as I read peoples comments and saw how people in real life feel about him, just how damaged I must be because I…understand and agree with him. So now I just never talk about my feelings about my dad and his wife in real life.

Harry us my celebrity spiritual animal.

You should get actual therapy. You’re a young person wallowing in something that can’t be changed, while your father and his wife - who did nothing wrong - are thriving. That’s sad.

Camilla’s endured a lot, and if she made that joke? NBD. Let people twist it and get all hot and bothered! The first in what probably will be a series of books illustrating who Harry and Meghan really are will sell all the more, which can’t be what they want, but so little of what they do makes rational sense.

Camilla deserved to endure a lot for her part in ruining a marriage. I can only think people who defend and romanticize her and Charles’ behavior, while hating Harry and Meghan for being honest (and profiting from it), are out of touch, racist, old, or a combination of the above.

Sure thing. I think people who care about Camilla’s scarlet letter still are just lame. She’s where she wants to be, seems content, seems accepted by actual grownups in the UK, and is presumably happy to not deal with her idiot son-in-law and his new mommy wife. I can’t imagine what a relief it is to not have to interact with them.

Camilla is indeed where she wanted to be and apparently didn't care how she got there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The BRF troll farms are out in force to promote Camilla now. I’ve seen similar comments on Twitter and Reddit all of a sudden. Why? Is there something coming out soon?

THIS! Big money bring spent to make Camilla likable before the Queen dies. PR blitz.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The BRF troll farms are out in force to promote Camilla now. I’ve seen similar comments on Twitter and Reddit all of a sudden. Why? Is there something coming out soon?

THIS! Big money bring spent to make Camilla likable before the Queen dies. PR blitz.

Lol.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dignified” my ass. Sorry, op.

+1. do you not know how she messed up Charles and Diana's relationship from the beginning? The cufflinks? Not staying away? The tampon stuff?
“

Charles messed up his marriage. Why is Camilla to blame? If it was t Camilla, it would have been someone else because he clearly never had feelings for Diana and admitted so to the press. Diana wasn’t the perfect wife either and her antics didn’t help with her relationship with Charles. All three of them have some blame in the breakup of Charles and Diana but Camilla has the least.

DP but the whole point of this thread is how dignified and awesome Camilla is. She carried on an extramarital affair for, what, decades? That's lousy, not least being because she was married to someone else, too. I'm not sure what's likable about her behavior.

Exactly! She is a terrible person. By extension, she is partially responsible for Diana's death.

That’s a stretch. Diana would be alive today is she had bothered to put on her seatbelt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dignified” my ass. Sorry, op.

+1. do you not know how she messed up Charles and Diana's relationship from the beginning? The cufflinks? Not staying away? The tampon stuff?
“

Charles messed up his marriage. Why is Camilla to blame? If it was t Camilla, it would have been someone else because he clearly never had feelings for Diana and admitted so to the press. Diana wasn’t the perfect wife either and her antics didn’t help with her relationship with Charles. All three of them have some blame in the breakup of Charles and Diana but Camilla has the least.

DP but the whole point of this thread is how dignified and awesome Camilla is. She carried on an extramarital affair for, what, decades? That's lousy, not least being because she was married to someone else, too. I'm not sure what's likable about her behavior.

Exactly! She is a terrible person. By extension, she is partially responsible for Diana's death.

You can’t blame Camilla for Diana’s death:

“In 2019, Dr. Richard Shepherd, Britain's top forensic pathologist, concluded that Diana died of a tiny, badly placed tear in the vein of her lung. "Her specific injury is so rare that in my entire career I don’t believe I’ve seen another," Shepherd wrote in his book, Unnatural Causes, excerpted in The Daily Mail.

Shepherd believes Diana's death could have been prevented by one small change: A seatbelt. "Had she been restrained, she would probably have appeared in public two days later with a black eye, perhaps a bit breathless from the fractured ribs and with a broken arm in a sling," Shepherd wrote.”

“The only survivor of the crash was Diana’s British bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones. He had been wearing a seatbelt. “

https://www.oprahdaily.com/entertainment/tv-movies/a29874597/princess-diana-death/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d say that! After reading The Palace Papers and reflecting on how quiet and dignified she’s been, and how she seems just a little bit devilish, enough to be fun, I think she seems like a nice person.

Didn’t that book feel a touch too sympathetic to the Windsors? I’ve already returned it to the library, so I can’t quote anything, but I got the feeling that it was very strongly pushing the narrative of relatable wives from healthy families v. pitiable wives from broken homes.

The book is clearly anti Diana, anti Meghan, pro-Camilla and pro Windsor and it STILL managed to make the royal family (and Camilla) seem like vapid, ugly trash. Which just shows you how ridiculously trashy they must be if a sympathetic portrait like that couldn’t make them palatable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d say that! After reading The Palace Papers and reflecting on how quiet and dignified she’s been, and how she seems just a little bit devilish, enough to be fun, I think she seems like a nice person.

Didn’t that book feel a touch too sympathetic to the Windsors? I’ve already returned it to the library, so I can’t quote anything, but I got the feeling that it was very strongly pushing the narrative of relatable wives from healthy families v. pitiable wives from broken homes.

The book is clearly anti Diana, anti Meghan, pro-Camilla and pro Windsor and it STILL managed to make the royal family (and Camilla) seem like vapid, ugly trash. Which just shows you how ridiculously trashy they must be if a sympathetic portrait like that couldn’t make them palatable.

Hi rabid Megan-stan! Missed you after the other royal threads were terminated for the attacks against the Cambridge children. 😘

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Never thought I’d say that! After reading The Palace Papers and reflecting on how quiet and dignified she’s been, and how she seems just a little bit devilish, enough to be fun, I think she seems like a nice person.

Didn’t that book feel a touch too sympathetic to the Windsors? I’ve already returned it to the library, so I can’t quote anything, but I got the feeling that it was very strongly pushing the narrative of relatable wives from healthy families v. pitiable wives from broken homes.

The book is clearly anti Diana, anti Meghan, pro-Camilla and pro Windsor and it STILL managed to make the royal family (and Camilla) seem like vapid, ugly trash. Which just shows you how ridiculously trashy they must be if a sympathetic portrait like that couldn’t make them palatable.

Hi rabid Megan-stan! Missed you after the other royal threads were terminated for the attacks against the Cambridge children. 😘

I’m not “rabid Megan-stan.” None of these people are particularly good for anything other than artificial drama to distract us from impending climate doom and the billionaires stealing the world’s wealth and ruining our lives.