Pretty sure she is going to be walking on more eggshells now that the husband had to leave his work to basically put out a kitchen fire because of her pet |
Just stop. We are talking about a young college student with no family to fall back on who is working her a$$ her dealing with OP's three kids WITH the stressed out husband IN the house. She's not "taking advantage" of anyone -- she's overwhelmed and you are all heartless. |
Where does OP says there was a fire? My smoke detector goes off every time I cook it seems. We've never had a fire. The OP is a drama queen and the husband is a PITA. |
Pretty sure that "dealing with OP's three kids" is her literal job, the one that she is paid for and provided housing for. She is being made to decide between her job/home and her pet. It is not that different from her not being allowed to bring her dog to her office job and also not being allowed to have her dog at her apartment. She would have to find a new solution for the dog, or a new job and a new apartment. This isn't some immeasurable cruelty here, this is just life. |
I guess we will have to agree to disagree here. If I had a live in household employee and I stated no pets, and they not only brought their pet but their pet barked incessently all day and scratched my doors and peed on my carpet, I wouldn't be on DCUM wringing my hands about what to do. And I'm surprised you are taking away that OP is a drama queen and her husband is a PITA, but, you may be one of those people who thinks the world should revolve around their dog, and maybe that explains it. |
Oh here we go. “You can’t afford a nanny…you’re likely very difficult to please…” blah blah blah. OP doesn’t want a dog in her home that barks all day long and pees on the rugs! |
The nanny is an employee. My employer does not deal with my personal issues for me or act like a surrogate parent. The nanny is an adult and an irresponsible one at that. |
Find a new nanny |
I also am on Team OP. She's been generous and tried to work out a solution. I also think that she values the nanny and has a multi-year relationship with the nanny and that it's worth bending over backwards to figure out a solution for this. For the person who said the nanny should advertise the senior dog on Craigslist and pay 100$ so that someone takes it away, you know that dog will end up in a shelter and likely destroyed. You're just passing the buck. |
bark collar, let the dog mingle with the family during the day, doggie daycare a couple times a week etc. There are solutions to this. |
No Bark collar on a senior dog!!!!!! |
That’s probably 80 hours of work for the Op to find and onboard a new nanny-considering interviews and search time. Not to mention onboarding. Good Nannies are hard to find and kids often have a bond with the nanny you don’t want to break. much easier to help her deal with the dog. |
Given the fact she left the stove to tend to the dog would’ve been cause for me to fire her immediately. Tell her dog has to go today if not she can go with him and find else where to live. You wouldn’t be wrong especially if it’s explicitly stated no animals/pets are allowed in your lease/contract. |
Well but that's the rub. OP seems to feel she can't get a new nanny. So the nanny actually has the upper hand here. |
I don't think she's "taking advantage" - I think she just doesn't feel she has any good choices here. It's not her fault her a-turd boyfriend moved and left her with a dog she's not able to properly care for. Now she's got to deal with that, without the resources she needs to be able to - obviously, living in her own place would be best, but she can't do that. She's going to have to find another home for the dog, or euthanize the dog, and both those things are hard and awful. |