Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I agreed that adding 2-3 talented girls won't change the results against the top 4 MD teams. For my child's team, sure, they have 2-3 girls who are not as talented as the rest (although they are still very good). I am not sure I would change them: they are solid team players, and not every one can or needs to be a superstar. When her team loses games to the top teams, it's not because those 2-3 girls, who don't have the ball that much, made a few mistakes. Rather, it's because the superstars made even more mistakes: bad or forced passes, poor angle shots or slow shots, which are all turnovers. They are young, so even the talent makes mistakes, and those mistakes cost the team wins in close games against top teams. Every year, the talent makes fewer mistakes, so it should get a better by 8th grade. I would also say that the top 4 teams foul more, and although the refs get better at calling it every year, they still call about 70%, not 100% -- so every foul the other team does that does not get called gets them an advantage. Also, the MD teams are slightly more disciplined about not having as many poor shots. Not sure why. Maybe that's because they've been playing together for longer than our girls, and every year brings more experience and more discipline. Or maybe their coaches are better about reminding the girls that every bad shot is a turnover, and usually a goal for the other team. But I am not sure I want our coaches to harp too much -- it should still be fun at this age and not so serious. They are still young and their improvement over the years has been unbelievable.
If you are complaining about how physical MD teams are, wait till you play the top teams from NY, NJ, or Florida