Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmation hearing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:11:15 pp These mofos trying to get her to "agree" with their rhetoric. Example: Senator John Comyn's lead in was lennngtthyyyy. He, like, Pence tries to get her to agree or disagree 1. "Politicians wear robes" duh yes, Republican justices wear their party on the sleeve of their robes. Dems too. Will she be any different? Kind of the pot calling the kettle black. Same sex marriage: he tries the trickery again. No where in the constitution does it state marriage is between a man/woman. Both agree. Then he asks if religion is mentioned in the first amendment. What's your point old man? He's reaching so hard on. His entire word vomit was about how vilified whites feel that they can only express their racism in "whispers" at home. WTF

He further poses the Booker case and how that decision went against the rule of Stare Decisis: Stare Decisis means “to stand by things decided” in Latin. When a court faces a legal argument, if a previous court has ruled on the same or a closely related issue, then the court will make their decision in alignment with the previous court's decision.

She teaches him about the new guidelines which allow a range of influence in judicial decisions. In other words, in light of systemic racism, equal rights = human rights means ratification or flexibility strictly within the range of constitutional law. He cuts her off! They don't want to hear her answers. They want her to be like Barrett and not answer any question that might negatively influence the votes. Brown Jackson has answered every question. She is so much smarter than them in degrees, experience, and life!

That should disqualify her. If you sexually abuse a child, systemic racism doesn’t matter. Ditto rape, murder, etc.
Bottom line is the average age of these old white justices is 80. And they're racist, and they're terrified. 👏🏼

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do GOP senators not let Judge Brown finish her answer? This is so disrespectful...they want to just listen to themselves. Mansplaining is alive in GOP.

Hmm. Perhaps you’ve forgotten how Barrett was rudely questioned and interrupted by disrespectful Democrats? What a short and selective memory you have.

Barrett couldn’t name the 5 freedoms protected by 1A.

[Anonymous]

She teaches him about the new guidelines which allow a range of influence in judicial decisions. In other words, in light of systemic racism, equal rights = human rights means ratification or flexibility strictly within the range of constitutional law.

That should disqualify her. If you sexually abuse a child, systemic racism doesn’t matter. Ditto rape, murder, etc.

You tried and failed at the fix. You assumed that statement was isolated for child offenders. Congress sets the guidelines and the range within the guidelines for all offenses. Jackson gave the maximum sentence recommendation to the judges in 10 cases BASED on the provisions set by Congress. In addition, she tacked on punitive restrictions.

Let me explain what these congressional guidelines and ranges mean based on constitutional law:

In its introduction to the Constitution of the United States Preamble, Articles I-VII, Amendments:

“The Constitution has evolved to meet the changing needs of a modern society profoundly different from the eighteenth-century world in which its creators lived. To date, the Constitution has been amended 27 times, most recently in 1992. The first ten amendments constitute the Bill of Rights.”

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I love Senator Klobuchar and am glad she represents me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do GOP senators not let Judge Brown finish her answer? This is so disrespectful...they want to just listen to themselves. Mansplaining is alive in GOP.

Hmm. Perhaps you’ve forgotten how Barrett was rudely questioned and interrupted by disrespectful Democrats? What a short and selective memory you have.

Barrett couldn’t name the 5 freedoms protected by 1A.

Shocker that she wasn’t qualified.

[Anonymous]

Hawley doesn't seem to understand what judges do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hawley doesn't seem to understand what judges do.

it's painful to listen. he is just putting up a show for his political gain. Funny when he said that Congresws wanted guidelines for sex offenders mandatory and she said that the SC in the person of none less than Justice Scalia held that they could not be

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hawley doesn't seem to understand what judges do.

He doth protest too much - it wouldn't surprise me if he were a pedophile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hawley doesn't seem to understand what judges do.

He doth protest too much - it wouldn't surprise me if he were a pedophile.

Yup, that's what I said in the thread it was posted first. The investigative journalists should dig into his history...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oooo, we're on a first name basis now, are we?

Sure. Just like you were on a first-name basis with Justice Barrett - repeatedly calling her "Amy" and a "handmaiden." Oh, and let's not forget "Brett." So Kentaji it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I noticed that this thread is just on page 3 on day 2 of the hearings. Compared to the multiple 250-page threads per day circus for Kavanaugh. Thank goodness for a decent candidate.

Yes, I’m glad Republicans aren’t putting Kentaji through the three-ring circus of idiocy that Democrats stooped to with Kavanaugh.

She hasn't been accused of rape in highly credible testimony.

Neither was he, dope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I noticed that this thread is just on page 3 on day 2 of the hearings. Compared to the multiple 250-page threads per day circus for Kavanaugh. Thank goodness for a decent candidate.

Yes, I’m glad Republicans aren’t putting Kentaji through the three-ring circus of idiocy that Democrats stooped to with Kavanaugh.

Well, what do you know? Brown probably was too boring to get involved in alleged and completely unproven "teenage activity" of assaulting anyone...

FIFY.

The FBI, at the White House’s instruction, ignored over 4000 tips. Let’s say 99% of those tips were bunk, submitted by crazy or malicious people. That leaves 40 potentially corroborating tips that should have been followed up on and weren’t.

And KBJ didn’t engage in what the GOP thinks of as “teenaged activity.” (You guys just can’t quit telling on yourselves.)

Has anyone busted out her high school yearbook yet?

[Anonymous]

Last chance for a black woman as justice. Next an Asian followed by hispanics as their majority — thankfully — takes over the country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why do GOP senators not let Judge Brown finish her answer? This is so disrespectful...they want to just listen to themselves. Mansplaining is alive in GOP.

Hmm. Perhaps you’ve forgotten how Barrett was rudely questioned and interrupted by disrespectful Democrats? What a short and selective memory you have.

Barrett couldn’t name the 5 freedoms protected by 1A.

Shocker that she wasn’t qualified.

Shocker that you're still triggered over her confirmation - and her "well-qualified" ABA rating.

https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/government_affairs_office/2020-10-11-barrett-rating-letter.pdf