| My kids scored well on math and science AP exams and saw the benefit once they got to college. Although they didn’t use the AP scores to place out of classes, they were awarded credit for them, which gave a lot of flexibility if they wanted to take a lighter course load for a particular semester. |
|
The reason they want Aps is because they want to see you are on the most toughest path. They care about the grade. Much much less so about the score. Top private schools are not giving you the credit anyway.
Even here, many colleges are not requiring 10-15 APs just because they are offered. Need to take a core group and they need to make sense to what you want to do. |
I'm not sure where you got these ideas, but I believe you're mistaken. When a highly selective college has a choice between a student who has taken 10 AP classes and has gotten scores of 5 on most versus a student who had the same AP options to choose from and only took 5 and scored 3s and 4s (or chose not to report scores), it's going to matter regardless of the grades they got in the class. As to private schools not giving credit, this is absolutely not true. Here's a link to Harvard's policy, which is probably similar to other highly selective schools. https://oue.fas.harvard.edu/apexams They offer credit for 24 AP courses. Sure, you have to score a 5, but over half of those 5s receive 8 credits toward graduation. You're right that no college requires a specific number of AP classes, but they do look to see if the choices you've been making include opting for the most rigorous class available. None of this means that kids should attempt to take more APs than they're capable of handling successfully. Take the highest level offered when you're motivated and can get an A or B in it without stressing yourself out too much. If that doesn't get you into one of the most selective colleges, wherever you land will be able to provide the same opportunities for future success. This website has quite a bit of data that shows this to be true..... https://lesshighschoolstress.com/ |
Your example does not leave any room for nuance. I am not sure a college would necessarily take your 10 AP / All 5s vs. a kid who takes 10 AP classes and only took 3 AP tests (scored all 5s), but then said their family could not afford the $700 for the other tests so they had to prioritize. Or even, a kid applying for say history who takes 10 AP classes, but only takes 5 AP tests (in history/english) and scores all 5s. I honestly don't know, but there will be many cases where it is not apples-to-apples |
|
Our DC had a grade "wobble" in covid and as a result our college guidance team suggest DC sit 2 AP exams even though they are not doing the AP course (as DC private that does not offer them). I think this was seen as an opportunity to "repair" some of the damage as an extra way of demonstrating the poor grade was a blip. We were told only to submit the scores if they were a 5. This would imply that AP exam scores are helpful in some circumstances.
|
So I went to that website, and it's conclusion was as follows: "At the Mayo Clinic, the percentage of students attending schools not in the MC25 was 70% for those who graduated between 1980 and 1999. For those who graduated in 2000 and after, that percentage rose to 74%. At Skadden Arps, the same percentage rose from 60% to 64%. At the Washington Post, it went from 56% in the 1980-1999 bracket to 66% in the new century. At the other top law firm, the percentage rose even more dramatically from 51% to 64%." If you take the reverse of those numbers, then wouldn't 26% of the Mayo Clinic, 36% of Skadden, 34% of WaPo and 36% of the other 'top law firm' come from their T25 schools. The same website says that: " These 25 colleges combined can accommodate less than 11% of those in the top 10%, or around 1.1% of all students. " Why wouldn't you reach the opposite conclusion, that in fact, going to a T25 school dramatically increases your opportunities? True, going to any school does not foreclose any opportunities, but the data doesn't seem to support the idea that you have equal chances at that opportunity. |
Sigh. And here we are, circling right back to the starting line. The question is, where is your support for the claim that "it's going to matter?" Provide links. Give concrete examples. Back it up. You can't. |
Same poster--I agree. But that confirms that the initial comment regarding colleges not caring so much about the score was incorrect. |
No, it doesn't. Not even a little bit. It "confirms" only that two anonymous posters who aren't experts in anything having to do with college admissions are having a confusing conversation where they both are offering their opinions. |
You've only given a little of the data provided. The site also points out that the reason the most selective colleges have higher percentages than you might expect based on population is that they get first pick of the strongest high school students every year. My thinking is that because what you want to know is if those with high numbers who aren't admitted to one of those top 25 colleges are going to be put at a disadvantage by having to attend a less selective college, you should only be comparing that list of top 25 schools with a very small portion of the population at each of the "backups". |
Woops, I meant AP BC as a soph. I'm sure there are some AP BS classes out there, though! |
There are way too many possible individual situations for any college to be crazy enough to publish a policy regarding how many AP courses someone should take or what specific scores need to be achieved in order to be admitted. The absence of that publication doesn't mean they aren't going to distinguish between students who have large differences in their achievement. They'd be ignoring very useful information in making a decision. |
No, it's now. This is for Blair magnet. Not the school overall. An earlier poster suggested magnet students take more APs, but for the reasons, I stated above, including not beaing allowed to take them in 9th, the Blair magnet (magnet being the key word here) students would likely take less than a regular Blair or W school or whatever student. |
Says the anonymous poster who isn't an expert in anything having to do with college admissions and who is confused by a straightforward conversation. |
Interesting. So if you take the other 8.9% of the top 10% and assume all of the non top 25 people at these places were from that group (which may or may not be reasonable) - then if the school doesn't matter (or matters very little), should you expect the ratio of non T25 to T25 to be approximately 8:1? But in reality, it's more like 2:1 or 3:1? |