|
^^ 100% not a typical nanny rate- but it is if you go through an agency. Parents who value consistent childcare and can afford to pay for it.
I am paid $37 an hour, 50 hours a week so last ten hours are time and a half. I balked at first at a job that ended at 5:30 instead of 3:30, as teaching did. But then I realized- I was never actually done at 3:30. So when I leave my nanny family- I’m done. I was careful to not only look for a well paying job but one that was centered around creating an educational environment. Although not required, I plan themed based learning (just took the plans from my classroom) and we do science experiments, sensory explorations, field trips. All with a provided credit card for child related experiences. We also go to the playgrounds too… but I love that I can recreate a classroom & scratch that teacher itch. |
| *sorry, also had a signing bonus and monthly bonuses for ontime arrival ect. And I have the right of first refusal for weekend babysitting- which would be @ overtime rate- but for now I want my weekends free. |
oh wow - seems like a good option - good luck |
Advocate for better curriculum (not DCPS created), more planning time without meetings, fewer tests that we have to enter into a computer to do nothing with, and actual behavior support so I can teach. At my school the white parents love to talk about how amazing our principal is, but she could care less about anything other than compliance and keeping her own job. |
In this, you are wrong. SOME testing and reporting is helpful. Too MUCH is just the opposite. Currently there is waaay too much, which does harm children. If I didn’t have so much administrative busy work, I could plan more field trips, hands-on experiences, FUN learning opportunities. |
| PP from above. I didn’t go into teaching to PROVE I could do my job. I went into it to actually DO my job. The proving is making the doing difficult. Too much time goes into weighing the cow now and not enough into fattening it. |
What are you talking about? The PP I was reasoning to literally said "We know teachers aren't on our sped kid's side." To me, that seems a pretty clear statement that they don't think sped teachers care about their kids. Or am I misinterpreting? |
Based on what I've read on this thread, none of the parents will believe that you care about the kids. They don't seem to understand that asking for smaller class sizes and more support might be good for the teacher, but is ALSO good for the kids. These things make our jobs easier, definitely, which makes it possible to do more for the kids we work with. Isn't that the whole point? |
So true. I have to say, and this is definitely not a common opinion, but I don't mind testing days. I put the kids on a computer, I'm not allowed to help them since it's a test, so as long as they stay quiet, I can work on all the boatloads of paperwork i have to do. It's not enough time to make up for the increased paperwork overall, but it means less I have to do from home that evening. This year, we are testing one day a week - it's extremely helpful for my schedule because I have time to get paperwork done. All that said, I am DEFINITELY advocating for a decrease in testing because it is TERRIBLE for students, and especially my special education students. Each test is another day that they get to feel stupid - they struggle through the test or just give up in the first 5 minutes. My students need more time for instruction to actually learn how to do the work. They need small group and 1:1 support to provide targeted support and learning strategies. If I COULD skip the test and just teach, I would do it and bring the paperwork home. But I'm not allowed to do that. So I use the time to my advantage to get everything done. Some tests are needed, for sure. But testing every week in every grade is unnecessary and doing far more harm to kids than anything. |
Testing one day a week is appalling. I am a teacher and things like this will make me send my own kid to private if we can afford it. No child should be on a computer 20% of their schooling time. Especially after last year. |
And it's only one test a week now. In September, it was 2, and it will be back to 2 central assigned tests in January because of MOY testing. And this doesn't even include teacher created assessments (the ones we actually use to support students because we can design them to provide us actual useful information). |
what an odd metaphor |
Assuming parents don't know that smaller class sizes is treating them like idiots. It's really not going to do you any favors. |
|
i seem to remember a whole lot of dialog here less than a year ago where union members were arguing that they were advocating for themselves and not children, and that this was the explicit purpose of the union.
and now we're supposed to forget that they said that |
Did you mean assuming parents don’t know smaller class sizes are better is treating them like idiots? Because that’s not true, some parents really don’t know. I tried to explain to parents the need for making sure we had another aide in the room for both the growth of their child and safety. But 50% of them don’t care because the incidents that have happened are small and their child is still learning. But there could be no incidents at all and their child could learn more! |