Yes, I agree. Normal, cautious Presidents would never have done this, because they would have sought public support (which after Iraq would never have been forthcoming) and would not have liked their odds, given US history in the middle east. It takes a truly impulsive and risk-accepting President, one who believes he is special and immune to making the usual mistakes, to make such an extremely rash decision. Without warning European allies, even - Italy's defense minister is currently in Bahrain with his family, sheltering in a parking garage with other people. But IF Iran can install a more open-minded regime (let's not hope for a democracy) with minimal bloodshed, plus an agreement on nuclear arms, and be rewarded with a lifting of international sanctions, which will allow it to breathe economically once again... I will give credit where credit is due. Unfortunately this has very little chance of happening. |
This is such a juvenile take. I’m going to lob a grenade, but that’s not war! Um, you have no control over how other people react and you just started the aggression. What if China bombs us because our felon is fu(king with the world? Then, he started a war. He said Americans will die, do you think that means he’s done?! WTAF is wrong with you cult followers?! |
GOP: Always so consistent, never hypocritical.
|
| How frightening for humanity that a man with his lack of morals and mental illness has so much power. |
|
Why would a child rapist report his buddy? Maybe trump didnt rape any kids. Why would anyone trust what Epstein says? He is mossad after all. Do you also believe trump slobbed Clinton’s knob? The Epstein files are probably largely fictionalized and sensationalized to undermine trumps administration and bully him Into submission vis a vis Iran |
|
"The Iranian state news agency IRNA said on Sunday morning that Iran’s president, the head of the judiciary and a jurist of the Guardian Council would be responsible during the transition period following the death of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. It cited Mohammed Mokhbher, a senior politician in Iran. "
- NYT This is interesting, because a few hours ago, I posted that the WaPo was reporting the Vice-President was going to manage affairs, but I couldn't find any confirmation at other news outlets. Was WaPo wrong? Is there a power struggle among leadership? |
Literally. Whatever the leader does, they agree with. |
That’s why Israel/America invaded Venezuela to get the oil to avoid this type of situation but apparently that isnt going to plan either and the oil isnt thst good over there |
|
The best way to shake a man like trump is threaten his popularity. It’s all he lives for. |
|
|
Trump never reported his buddy the police. Trump was to excited by what Epstein provide him. |
I suspect there is a large part of uncorroborated lurid stories in there, but this has nothing to do with Iran or Israel and anything international. People detest Trump, so of course they're going to jump at the chance of taking any sensationalist accusation in the files verbatim. It's too tempting. MAGA fell for exactly the same thing during the Hunter laptop story. And Pizzagate. And all the rest of the sensationalism around all the Democrat Presidents and some of their unfortunate family members. The smooth-brained people on both sides of the political spectrum are dividing our country because they can't stop themselves from being that stupid. They're the useful mob that comes with pitchforks for any reason, good or bad. No one should be encouraging this. We want facts and evidence, and we want to focus on credible accusations. |
Why are MAGA so dumb? Seriously. |
Everyone knows, or should know, that Venezuela's oil rigs and infrastructure are so damaged from lack of maintenance that it would take many years to rebuild them and many more years to make any sort of profit. Oil companies said as much when Maduro was captured and Trump invited them back in. So no. No nation on earth thought Venezuela could be a quick fix to Iran closing the strait of Hormuz. It's a long-term investment, rather, and only for companies with deep pockets and nations willing to wait. |