Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm sorry, can we talk again about Trump GRABBING THE STEERING WHEEL LIKE A DERANGED TODDLER?

My colleague and I were just trying to imagine the logistics of this portly man trying to get through the gap in the front seats to do this.

It's a large car.

He was not in limo but I. The big black SVU. Pay attention,! PBS will be replaying the last three hearings this Saturday. Watch and learn!

And yet...

https://fanbuzz.com/luxury/the-beast-presidential-limo/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.

Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She’s is/was a partisan Republican. She interned for Scalise, Cruz, and the White House while in college, then got hired in the White House legislative office, impressed Meadows enough that he promoted her when he took over as COS. She was in the middle of all the Covid legislative work. He took her to every meeting where she quietly took good notes and remembered who said what and then became the gatekeeper for Members of Congress and others to get Meadows’ attention. People told her everything because her boss was often avoiding them and they needed her to get to him.

[Anonymous]

Why would they ask her to testify when secret service personnel could?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To recap:

Trump knew large numbers of people in the crowd were armed—or auto told Meadows and Hutchinson.

Trump wanted the armed crowd to move toward the Capitol and “stop the steal”.

The VP and the Speaker were at the Capitol.

Trump knew there were threats against the VP and didn’t ask supporters to be peaceful and stay away from the Capitol—he encouraged them to go there and fight, naming the VP as someone who didn’t do what needed to be done to stop the election.

The violent crowd within 40 ft of the VP.

If he had been killed, I would say Trump could be tried for felony murder. Luckily the VP wasn’t killed. It was “just” a failed coup.

You forgot the part where Trump asked for additional forces and was turned down.

Imagine that. Nancy adamantly refused the National Guard on standby. Why??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No, it's not. They are two different vehicles.

Your fixation on what model vehicle he was using is weird. If Trump was being peddled around on a tandem bike, that wouldn't make this situation any better.

It makes a difference because the 'beast' has a shield that would have prevented him from reaching the driver

Evidently, you have never been in a chauffered limo. There is a partition and a button that that the passenger can push and, viola, the partition rolls down!!!

And then elastic-man stretched his gumby arm to reach the driver

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To recap:

Trump knew large numbers of people in the crowd were armed—or auto told Meadows and Hutchinson.

Trump wanted the armed crowd to move toward the Capitol and “stop the steal”.

The VP and the Speaker were at the Capitol.

Trump knew there were threats against the VP and didn’t ask supporters to be peaceful and stay away from the Capitol—he encouraged them to go there and fight, naming the VP as someone who didn’t do what needed to be done to stop the election.

The violent crowd within 40 ft of the VP.

If he had been killed, I would say Trump could be tried for felony murder. Luckily the VP wasn’t killed. It was “just” a failed coup.

You forgot the part where Trump asked for additional forces and was turned down.

Imagine that. Nancy adamantly refused the National Guard on standby. Why??

Jesus Christ, we’ve talked about this for a year and a half. Nancy Pelosi is not in charge of the national guard. Neither is Muriel Bowser, since that’s probably your next ancient argument.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

No they didn’t.

The agents are saying they’re available to testify that her second-hand story is 100% false. Not very helpful to the cause, huh?

They won’t testify under oath though. They told her the story. Ornato’s isn’t even a significant part of her testimony. It’s one of dozens of pieces of evidence that Trump intended to go to the Capitol and the USSS said no. Trump himself has said it. You MAGAs are so delusional.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

Watch her testimony. You will believe her if you do.

I did. And no. Clavicles?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Never ever in the history of testimony has someone ever given false testimony!

The ratings of these hearings are deplorable. The vast majority of the country has moved on. This grandstanding non both sides is wasting time and money. The country has moved on and is worried about inflation, crumbling infrastructure, and high gas prices. They really do not care as much as the small minority of posters here seem to think they do or should.

Only the GOP cared about Ken Starr's witch hunt that went on for years and cost millions of dollars and we're a waste of time. These hearings are not a waste of time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would they ask her to testify when secret service personnel could?

Watch her testimony instead of asking stupid questions. That’s a small part of her testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.

Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

She's apparently THAT good

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

No they didn’t.

The agents are saying they’re available to testify that her second-hand story is 100% false. Not very helpful to the cause, huh?

They won’t testify under oath though. They told her the story. Ornato’s isn’t even a significant part of her testimony. It’s one of dozens of pieces of evidence that Trump intended to go to the Capitol and the USSS said no. Trump himself has said it. You MAGAs are so delusional.

If they don't testify, it is because the committee has chosen not to have them testify.
That will be another black eye for this committee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To recap:

Trump knew large numbers of people in the crowd were armed—or auto told Meadows and Hutchinson.

Trump wanted the armed crowd to move toward the Capitol and “stop the steal”.

The VP and the Speaker were at the Capitol.

Trump knew there were threats against the VP and didn’t ask supporters to be peaceful and stay away from the Capitol—he encouraged them to go there and fight, naming the VP as someone who didn’t do what needed to be done to stop the election.

The violent crowd within 40 ft of the VP.

If he had been killed, I would say Trump could be tried for felony murder. Luckily the VP wasn’t killed. It was “just” a failed coup.

You forgot the part where Trump asked for additional forces and was turned down.

Imagine that. Nancy adamantly refused the National Guard on standby. Why??

I would have settled for additional Capitol Police forces.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

Watch her testimony. You will believe her if you do.

I did. And no. Clavicles?

That’s all you got? You need help.