Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

No they didn’t.

The agents are saying they’re available to testify that her second-hand story is 100% false. Not very helpful to the cause, huh?


They won’t testify under oath though. They told her the story. Ornato’s isn’t even a significant part of her testimony. It’s one of dozens of pieces of evidence that Trump intended to go to the Capitol and the USSS said no. Trump himself has said it. You MAGAs are so delusional.


If they don't testify, it is because the committee has chosen not to have them testify.
That will be another black eye for this committee.


Bullshit. Ornato and Engel don’t want to be asked about all the insane shit Trump did and said in their presence. The USSS doesn’t want them to talk. Trump sure as hell doesn’t want them under oath.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

No they didn’t.

The agents are saying they’re available to testify that her second-hand story is 100% false. Not very helpful to the cause, huh?


They won’t testify under oath though. They told her the story. Ornato’s isn’t even a significant part of her testimony. It’s one of dozens of pieces of evidence that Trump intended to go to the Capitol and the USSS said no. Trump himself has said it. You MAGAs are so delusional.


If they don't testify, it is because the committee has chosen not to have them testify.
That will be another black eye for this committee.

Exactly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.


Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

She's apparently THAT good


She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The driver can’t refute her story because her story is that this is what Ornato told her. The driver wasn’t in Ornato’s office when he told her. If it happened, Ornato and Engle aren’t going to admit it because they will protect Trump. There is no doubt that Trump wanted to go to the Capitol and was pissed when told he couldn’t. We know that because Trump said so when he got back to the White House. McEnany corroborated that he was mad and still wanted to go to the Capitol. If your only dispute with Hutchinson’s testimony is whether Trump could reach the steering wheel, that’s an irrelevant detail that may have been exaggerated by Engle telling Ornato or by Ornato telling Hutchinson. You still have Trump reaching for the driver, Engle grabbing Trump’s arm, and Trump grabbing Engle. Hutchinson didn’t make all that up. It’s the story she was told.


Oh boy. I thought Engle was the driver. No? Then the driver can’t refute that Ornato told her that story, but he could certainly have already corroborated that Trump lunged at the wheel. He could certainly corroborate that someone’s clavicle was endangered.


Did you watch the hearing yesterday? You thought? See what happens when you think and you aren't accustomed to thinking. Go back to page one and read entire thread. Stop thinking because it isn't working for you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.


Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

She's apparently THAT good


She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.

Well, her latest performance guarantees her any job she wants - for Radical Democrats. Just watch.

But it’s curious why she was unemployed for 18 months. Perhaps she moved back in with her parents.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Never ever in the history of testimony has someone ever given false testimony!

The ratings of these hearings are deplorable. The vast majority of the country has moved on. This grandstanding non both sides is wasting time and money. The country has moved on and is worried about inflation, crumbling infrastructure, and high gas prices. They really do not care as much as the small minority of posters here seem to think they do or should.


Completely false. Millions are watching. Millions want accountability.


MILLIONS are not watching. The ratings do not reflect.


They are watching. They are watching streaming which isn’t recorded by the ratings.

For every 1 person watching tv I know 20 who watch later via streaming.


Wrong. Nielsen +7 accounts for streaming.

No one I know on the left or right is watching nor do they care one bit!


NY Times says 20 million.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/10/business/media/jan-6-hearing-ratings.html

Hearings are on during working hours and PBS stations aired again at 11 pm last night.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.


Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

She's apparently THAT good


She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.

Well, her latest performance guarantees her any job she wants - for Radical Democrats. Just watch.

But it’s curious why she was unemployed for 18 months. Perhaps she moved back in with her parents.


Working in the Trump White House put a stench on a lot of people.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.


Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

She's apparently THAT good


The book deal is coming, she’ll retire ate 25. She is THAT good!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Who did she go to work for after Mark Meadows?

She doesn’t have a job right now, as has been mentioned in this thread several times.


Man just think Fox News could have hired her for 450k a year and none of this would have be exposed. Short sited on Fox News part.

She’s been unemployed for over a year?

She's apparently THAT good


She has the stench of Trump and Meadows and Cruz and Scalise on her resume.

Well, her latest performance guarantees her any job she wants - for Radical Democrats. Just watch.

But it’s curious why she was unemployed for 18 months. Perhaps she moved back in with her parents.


Working in the Trump White House put a stench on a lot of people.


Trump put a stench on America. We are all still trying to scrub it away.
Anonymous
Who is playing Cassidy in the 10 part Netflix/Hulu series?

Hopefully not Kirsten Stewart.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What was such an emergency about Hutchinson's testimony that it had to be rushed for a special session?

She had already said a lot of things on tape and some of it had been aired in snippets on previous days.

Why not just wait a few days until August, as the committee had previously planned?

Her testimony of secondhand gossip has already fallen apart. The agents who were actually in the car said she’s lying. Oops.

No they didn’t.


She testified under oath, on Capitol Hill, under penalty of perjury.

All we have to contradict her testimony so far is anonymous whining.

And the details of the car incident are the very least important details, And she was just reporting what someone else told her in that case.

The other details were more important And can also be corroborated in other ways.

(Paraphrased from someone online)
Anonymous
Pat Cipollone has just been subpoenaed. Do we have a list of all the rouge players that refuse to defend their reputation under oath?
Anonymous
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow. I just read the transcript from yesterday and it was very damning for Trump. I don’t see how his supporters and Republicans can ignore this. [/quote]

We don’t believe her testimony one bit. She has proven to have been lying and sharing hearsay. She is not a credible witness. She is well rehearsed and well polished but nothing but a BS artist.[/quote]

Is that a royal we? I bet you will argue she lied if she said that 3+2=5. If you weren't so absymally stupid that you are a perfect member of the Deplorables. Go back to your dank hole.
Anonymous
I just can’t believe Cassidy has been unemployed for 18 mos. Something fishy about that. Any evidence out there?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I just can’t believe Cassidy has been unemployed for 18 mos. Something fishy about that. Any evidence out there?


She's a Trumper who got fired. Who on earth would hire her?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: