Biden’s economy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is what the Fed wanted. Rate cuts are sure to happen now.

The Fed wanted a soft landing, which this is not. Monetary policy is too restrictive and Harrisnomics is working!

Waaaaay too early to declare that. A "soft landing" is when a central bank "is able to bring inflation down and cool a hot economy without setting off a significant decline in economic activity, also known as a recession."

No indications yet that we are in a recession. And even a mild one-to-two quarter recession wouldn't be bad. It would allow rates to get cut, refinancing to gear up, and allow balance sheets some breathing room.

Today's number triggered the Sahm rule, which says we are already in a recession.

Perfect timing for the November elections... Trump wins

Remind us what Trump's plan is for inflation? Have been waiting, but all talk, no policy?

Trade, tariffs and energy. Don't accuse him of inaction because you haven't been paying attention.

But tariffs are inflationary and energy only drove a portion of inflation. That's it? Doesn't sound like a promising plan.

I'm sorry. Am I talking to the same person who said there was no plan?

[Anonymous]

Hullo?

[Anonymous]

I think hell just froze over because I agree with Elizabeth Warren

They spent too much time raising rates early one and then should have started cutting, even a quarter percent, earlier this year.

Trump trojan horse (Powell) is tanking the economy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think hell just froze over because I agree with Elizabeth Warren

They spent too much time raising rates early one and then should have started cutting, even a quarter percent, earlier this year.

Trump trojan horse (Powell) is tanking the economy.

Biden hired Powell, dimwit.

Inflation is still too high because of Bidenomics. You can't have your cake and eat it too. Biden wanted cheap money flowing into the economy, now the piper must be paid.

It's hilarious trying to blame Powell for doing what Volcker had to do too. Inflation is worse than a recession. Maybe Biden shouldn't have printed trillions of dollars that were unneeded.

Again, Biden appointed Powell, stop blaming Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is what the Fed wanted. Rate cuts are sure to happen now.

The Fed wanted a soft landing, which this is not. Monetary policy is too restrictive and Harrisnomics is working!

Waaaaay too early to declare that. A "soft landing" is when a central bank "is able to bring inflation down and cool a hot economy without setting off a significant decline in economic activity, also known as a recession."

No indications yet that we are in a recession. And even a mild one-to-two quarter recession wouldn't be bad. It would allow rates to get cut, refinancing to gear up, and allow balance sheets some breathing room.

Today's number triggered the Sahm rule, which says we are already in a recession.

Perfect timing for the November elections... Trump wins

Remind us what Trump's plan is for inflation? Have been waiting, but all talk, no policy?

Simple.

Don’t spend 800 billion dollars that to you had to print out of thin air.

The IRA, which actually raises inflation, was majority funding Green New Deal objectives.

Inflation is simple. When you print more money, the existing money that is out there becomes less valuable and prices go up to compensate. So all Trump has to do to combat inflation is STOP WASTING more money by not passing these large spending bills that are not funded

Done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is what the Fed wanted. Rate cuts are sure to happen now.

The Fed wanted a soft landing, which this is not. Monetary policy is too restrictive and Harrisnomics is working!

Waaaaay too early to declare that. A "soft landing" is when a central bank "is able to bring inflation down and cool a hot economy without setting off a significant decline in economic activity, also known as a recession."

No indications yet that we are in a recession. And even a mild one-to-two quarter recession wouldn't be bad. It would allow rates to get cut, refinancing to gear up, and allow balance sheets some breathing room.

Today's number triggered the Sahm rule, which says we are already in a recession.

Perfect timing for the November elections... Trump wins

Remind us what Trump's plan is for inflation? Have been waiting, but all talk, no policy?

Simple.

Don’t spend 800 billion dollars that to you had to print out of thin air.

The IRA, which actually raises inflation, was majority funding Green New Deal objectives.

Inflation is simple. When you print more money, the existing money that is out there becomes less valuable and prices go up to compensate. So all Trump has to do to combat inflation is STOP WASTING more money by not passing these large spending bills that are not funded

Done.

The definition of inflation is inflating the money supply.

The result of inflation is ballooning prices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is what the Fed wanted. Rate cuts are sure to happen now.

The Fed wanted a soft landing, which this is not. Monetary policy is too restrictive and Harrisnomics is working!

Waaaaay too early to declare that. A "soft landing" is when a central bank "is able to bring inflation down and cool a hot economy without setting off a significant decline in economic activity, also known as a recession."

No indications yet that we are in a recession. And even a mild one-to-two quarter recession wouldn't be bad. It would allow rates to get cut, refinancing to gear up, and allow balance sheets some breathing room.

Today's number triggered the Sahm rule, which says we are already in a recession.

Perfect timing for the November elections... Trump wins

Remind us what Trump's plan is for inflation? Have been waiting, but all talk, no policy?

Simple.

Don’t spend 800 billion dollars that to you had to print out of thin air.

The IRA, which actually raises inflation, was majority funding Green New Deal objectives.

Inflation is simple. When you print more money, the existing money that is out there becomes less valuable and prices go up to compensate. So all Trump has to do to combat inflation is STOP WASTING more money by not passing these large spending bills that are not funded

Done.

Inflation since the IRA:

And this is from almost a year ago, it’s way lower now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is what the Fed wanted. Rate cuts are sure to happen now.

The Fed wanted a soft landing, which this is not. Monetary policy is too restrictive and Harrisnomics is working!

Waaaaay too early to declare that. A "soft landing" is when a central bank "is able to bring inflation down and cool a hot economy without setting off a significant decline in economic activity, also known as a recession."

No indications yet that we are in a recession. And even a mild one-to-two quarter recession wouldn't be bad. It would allow rates to get cut, refinancing to gear up, and allow balance sheets some breathing room.

Today's number triggered the Sahm rule, which says we are already in a recession.

Perfect timing for the November elections... Trump wins

Remind us what Trump's plan is for inflation? Have been waiting, but all talk, no policy?

Simple.

Don’t spend 800 billion dollars that to you had to print out of thin air.

The IRA, which actually raises inflation, was majority funding Green New Deal objectives.

Inflation is simple. When you print more money, the existing money that is out there becomes less valuable and prices go up to compensate. So all Trump has to do to combat inflation is STOP WASTING more money by not passing these large spending bills that are not funded

Done.

Inflation since the IRA:

And this is from almost a year ago, it’s way lower now.

So did the IRA cause inflation across the globe?

No?

Oh, then I guess it wasn't the IRA.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]https://x.com/steveguest/status/1819463210728411411?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]https://x.com/steveguest/status/1819463210728411411?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g

[Anonymous]

The economy needs to slow in order for bring down inflation.

[Anonymous]

So predictable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So predictable.

What she said had nothing to do with today’s jobs report.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So predictable.

What she said had nothing to do with today’s jobs report.

What she says has nothing to do with anything relevant. It’s how she rolls.
She owns the sluggish economy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So predictable.

What she said had nothing to do with today’s jobs report.

What she says has nothing to do with anything relevant. It’s how she rolls.
She owns the sluggish economy.

Uh, you were calling it Bidenomics a few weeks ago. Sorry, she can safely distance herself from any of Biden's economic shortcomings and can pivot to her own economic policies.