Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.

Yep, at the very least, some were instructed to redact using the highlight tool and said ok, knowing full well that would not work. Lol

The technical term is "working to rule," and it's a time-honored tradition. Not their fault that the people telling them what to do are incompetent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
It has looked like the GOP was sliding downhill since the rise of the Tea Party, but I honestly would never have predicted we'd end up at a place where the avowed conservative right wore diapers on their faces, maxipads on their ears, and are still celebrating the dribbling old guy who talks about his wife's steamed panties and (by the way) is both a convicted rapist and apparently involved in a billionaire international child sex trafficking ring. Also, he's been tearing down the White House.

WTF happened to your party?

It started with Newt, actually, who defined the two sides as winners and losers and a zero sum game to "win" regardless of how any policy might impact actual Americans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.

I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.

Do you support waitresses spitting on food?

I think the better analogy is - do you support the waitress leaving off the heavy sauce the chef intended she put on to cover up the fact that he is trying to sell you rancid meat?

[Anonymous]

SDNY wanted to prosecute at least one other person but the Trump regime is hiding that persons name. Wonder who that might be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is Clinton popping up so often here?

Because Clinton’s a pig and because the DOJ is corrupt and removing as much of Trump as they can get away with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.

I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.

Malicious compliance.

[Anonymous]

The President does not have the full use of his faculties these days. I highly doubt anyone told him what was in the latest batch of files. When someone tells him, he will naturally say it's 100% fake.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is Clinton popping up so often here?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is Clinton popping up so often here?

Because Trump’s people are desperately trying to “both sides” a child trafficking ring.

[Anonymous]

One thing is certain is that Maxwell will never be pardoned or her sentence commuted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.

I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.

Malicious compliance.

Indeed, and it's the perfect response to being supervised by incompetents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is Clinton popping up so often here?

Because Trump’s people are desperately trying to “both sides” a child trafficking ring.

Exactly.

Clinton has called for the full release, which likely means he’s not in the Trump pedo club.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

30% of this country would believe anything they were told to believe by Fox News.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

30% of this country would believe anything they were told to believe by Fox News.

It also means that even some MAGA know the truth about Trump. Others respond that way because they’d never respond otherwise on a political poll despite the subject.