Epstein Files

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:

This has to be a lot of stress for someone who is fragile enough to be getting serial MRIs and MoCA testing.



Right?

He’s up all night crying and sniveling about late night talk show hosts so they have to fill him full of drugs to get out his psychotic rants in the day. It’s elder abuse and he deserves every moment of misery.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.


Do you support waitresses spitting on food?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.


Do you support waitresses spitting on food?


Better analogy is Hogan's Heros.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.


Do you support waitresses spitting on food?


I don't know, I mean we're talking about Trump's corrupt DOJ redacting Trump's own widespread participation and partnership in a global pedophilia operation. History won't be kind to him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.


Do you support waitresses spitting on food?


If they were serving Klan wizards, Nazis, and pedophiles?

Yes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.


Do you support waitresses spitting on food?


The fact that you wouldn’t support it in this scenario says a lot about you.

A LOT.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


I would absolutely believe this.

An administration can't aggressively work to "traumatize" its civil service, then in the same year overwork them to whitewash over the details of its own leader's specific participation in an actual pedophile and prostitution ring without some of those low-level, traumatized workers resisting as best they can.


Do you support waitresses spitting on food?


I would not be surprised by a waitress spitting on your food, but that doesn't mean I support it.

I'm not surprised by your post, but that doesn't mean I support it. See how this works?
Anonymous

Hey PP who brought up the waitresses -- if you kick a dog or a mule, it'll probably bite you or kick back.

Don't get all surprised by that.
Anonymous

You think "waitresses spitting on food" is a sane analogy for "allowing the public who vote for you to see the evidence of your heinous crimes?"

That's ... kind of a stupid thing to post.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Hey PP who brought up the waitresses -- if you kick a dog or a mule, it'll probably bite you or kick back.

Don't get all surprised by that.


Seems on point. If the waitress was a teen, she'd also be a candidate for Trump and Epstein's operation (e.g., Virginia Giuffre worked in Trump's spa) . It'd certainly be justified if she spit in their food.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Hey PP who brought up the waitresses -- if you kick a dog or a mule, it'll probably bite you or kick back.

Don't get all surprised by that.


Seems on point. If the waitress was a teen, she'd also be a candidate for Trump and Epstein's operation (e.g., Virginia Giuffre worked in Trump's spa) . It'd certainly be justified if she spit in their food.


PP would say that two wrongs don't make a right. Just because they raped her, doesn't mean she can give them even a dirty look.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files on the DOJ website allow you to highlight the redacted text, copy it, and paste it into another document, which reveals what was hidden. You can also press Ctrl+F and search for “Trump ” (with a space) to see his name appear more than 600 times.

Lol. Only the most brilliant people for Trump's DOJ.

No. The redactions were done by low level civil servants who did this as an act of noncompliance. It’s a brilliant FU to the Trump regime.


Yep, at the very least, some were instructed to redact using the highlight tool and said ok, knowing full well that would not work. Lol
Anonymous

It has looked like the GOP was sliding downhill since the rise of the Tea Party, but I honestly would never have predicted we'd end up at a place where the avowed conservative right wore diapers on their faces, maxipads on their ears, and are still celebrating the dribbling old guy who talks about his wife's steamed panties and (by the way) is both a convicted rapist and apparently involved in a billionaire international child sex trafficking ring. Also, he's been tearing down the White House.

WTF happened to your party?
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: