Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.

This is crazy! Why in the world is Russia doing this? Sorry to say, but the death of a monach is not really globally relevant, in terms of geo-strategic scheming. Life (and war in Ukraine) will go on. Or are they just bored and like messing with people?

Well, King Charles is one of the last remaining Romanov descendants (seriously). Could all be part of the plan to reestablish the Russian Empire.

No. They want to sow in the West distrust of institutions like BP.

But again, the BP doesn't really do anything, so...who cares? I don't buy that it's destabilizing in the least. Plus there's a suitable monarch in waiting, anyway. We just went through this, remember?

Or maybe you don't understand the BRF and the UK?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.

This is crazy! Why in the world is Russia doing this? Sorry to say, but the death of a monach is not really globally relevant, in terms of geo-strategic scheming. Life (and war in Ukraine) will go on. Or are they just bored and like messing with people?

Well, King Charles is one of the last remaining Romanov descendants (seriously). Could all be part of the plan to reestablish the Russian Empire.

No. They want to sow in the West distrust of institutions like BP.

BP is irrelevant though. Does not seem worth the effort.

The BRF is one of the pillars of Western history. It is absolutely worth the effort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The very idea of democracy is predicated on accepting shared truths. If everyone stops believing there is a “truth”—ie every photo is fraudulent—that serves the interests of those seeking to undermine democracy in the west. There are real consequences to these deranged conspiracies.

How is a monarchy the bastion of democracy in your mind?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.

This is crazy! Why in the world is Russia doing this? Sorry to say, but the death of a monach is not really globally relevant, in terms of geo-strategic scheming. Life (and war in Ukraine) will go on. Or are they just bored and like messing with people?

Well, King Charles is one of the last remaining Romanov descendants (seriously). Could all be part of the plan to reestablish the Russian Empire.

No. They want to sow in the West distrust of institutions like BP.

BP is irrelevant though. Does not seem worth the effort.

You really don't think you could be wrong about that? Despite evidence to the contrary?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate to mention this as it was very odd but just as covid shutdowns were ending I got a job offer from a Russian woman to do some "easy online work from home". It felt like a scam since I only met her in person once and she was offering me a job, so I didn't follow up. I'm still sure it was a scam but I always have this nagging suspicion it was a real offer and the job might have been to post disinformation/sway social media, then I feel like a crazy conspiracy theorist and push the thought down. Stuff like this reminds me of it all though.

This is a well known scam. Your job ends up to be buying gift cards for your boss and wiring your money to your boss.

Yes, I think you're right. I just didn't even respond it felt so scammy to give no description.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.

This is crazy! Why in the world is Russia doing this? Sorry to say, but the death of a monach is not really globally relevant, in terms of geo-strategic scheming. Life (and war in Ukraine) will go on. Or are they just bored and like messing with people?

Well, King Charles is one of the last remaining Romanov descendants (seriously). Could all be part of the plan to reestablish the Russian Empire.

No. They want to sow in the West distrust of institutions like BP.

But again, the BP doesn't really do anything, so...who cares? I don't buy that it's destabilizing in the least. Plus there's a suitable monarch in waiting, anyway. We just went through this, remember?

It’s not about the BP per se. it’s about the idea that a formal and respected intuition releases a statement and you reject it for no reason other than distrust in said institution.

Are you referring to any statement in particular?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The very idea of democracy is predicated on accepting shared truths. If everyone stops believing there is a “truth”—ie every photo is fraudulent—that serves the interests of those seeking to undermine democracy in the west. There are real consequences to these deranged conspiracies.

How is a monarchy the bastion of democracy in your mind?

It’s not. But the BRF and other western monarchies absolutely coexist with democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The very idea of democracy is predicated on accepting shared truths. If everyone stops believing there is a “truth”—ie every photo is fraudulent—that serves the interests of those seeking to undermine democracy in the west. There are real consequences to these deranged conspiracies.

How is a monarchy the bastion of democracy in your mind?

Have you ever heard of the Magna Carta?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never cared about royals and would not have noticed if she took a year off, but the deception with the photo has me hooked on this story.

Same. I'd say my pre-photo interest in the royals was mild and entirely for fun. I have long enjoyed looking at the fashion. But I barely followed the whole Harry and Meghan thing. To me it was on par with most celebrity gossip -- a way to pass the time in a waiting room or on a plane, can be fun to chat with friends about, but not something I take seriously or think about almost at all the rest of the time.

The photo incident really grabbed my attention because I can't remember the last time a high profile public person did something that strange, press wise. I don't buy most of the theories about it (she's not dead, why would they hide this, and the divorce/affair rumors are all pretty ridiculous-sounding) but I am very curious to find out how that screw up happened and think there might be some kind of underlying scandal. Thus watching and waiting to see what it is, if anything.

I used to feel the same until I saw all the attacks on MM for dating/marrying Harry. I then got interested in how racist and awful British media was. I read Spare and it definitely makes me take notice of how exact the descriptions are for what is going on. Harry never bad mouthed Camilla but did say she had the most cunning PR team at her disposal (compared to the other royals). It's true there is never a negative story about her. They also trade stories with the press (you can post this if you kill that). Kate's PR is either turning on her or letting someone with less smarts and more power call the shots. The photo wasn't just edited here and there or to switch prints, they put Kate's face in from a magazine cover she had been in, so that makes it a bit wilder than a few blurry bits.

Less smarts + more power = William

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of you who don't believe Russia is engaged in a disinformation/fake news war, Russian media is reporting that Charles has died, complete with fake announcement from Buckingham Palace.

This is crazy! Why in the world is Russia doing this? Sorry to say, but the death of a monach is not really globally relevant, in terms of geo-strategic scheming. Life (and war in Ukraine) will go on. Or are they just bored and like messing with people?

Well, King Charles is one of the last remaining Romanov descendants (seriously). Could all be part of the plan to reestablish the Russian Empire.

No. They want to sow in the West distrust of institutions like BP.

But again, the BP doesn't really do anything, so...who cares? I don't buy that it's destabilizing in the least. Plus there's a suitable monarch in waiting, anyway. We just went through this, remember?

It’s not about the BP per se. it’s about the idea that a formal and respected intuition releases a statement and you reject it for no reason other than distrust in said institution.

Are you referring to any statement in particular?

No, I was just referring to the idea that some people will reject anything coming out of the firm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I hate to mention this as it was very odd but just as covid shutdowns were ending I got a job offer from a Russian woman to do some "easy online work from home". It felt like a scam since I only met her in person once and she was offering me a job, so I didn't follow up. I'm still sure it was a scam but I always have this nagging suspicion it was a real offer and the job might have been to post disinformation/sway social media, then I feel like a crazy conspiracy theorist and push the thought down. Stuff like this reminds me of it all though.

I am begging you: dig up that email and tell her you've been wondering for four years what the job is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never cared about royals and would not have noticed if she took a year off, but the deception with the photo has me hooked on this story.

Same. I'd say my pre-photo interest in the royals was mild and entirely for fun. I have long enjoyed looking at the fashion. But I barely followed the whole Harry and Meghan thing. To me it was on par with most celebrity gossip -- a way to pass the time in a waiting room or on a plane, can be fun to chat with friends about, but not something I take seriously or think about almost at all the rest of the time.

The photo incident really grabbed my attention because I can't remember the last time a high profile public person did something that strange, press wise. I don't buy most of the theories about it (she's not dead, why would they hide this, and the divorce/affair rumors are all pretty ridiculous-sounding) but I am very curious to find out how that screw up happened and think there might be some kind of underlying scandal. Thus watching and waiting to see what it is, if anything.

I used to feel the same until I saw all the attacks on MM for dating/marrying Harry. I then got interested in how racist and awful British media was. I read Spare and it definitely makes me take notice of how exact the descriptions are for what is going on. Harry never bad mouthed Camilla but did say she had the most cunning PR team at her disposal (compared to the other royals). It's true there is never a negative story about her. They also trade stories with the press (you can post this if you kill that). Kate's PR is either turning on her or letting someone with less smarts and more power call the shots. The photo wasn't just edited here and there or to switch prints, they put Kate's face in from a magazine cover she had been in, so that makes it a bit wilder than a few blurry bits.

Less smarts + more power = William

I think this too.

[Anonymous]

I don't think it's so much that it's "worth the effort" as their job is to be internet trolls trolling everyone and especially their government (and monarchy). They've been shown to do plenty of stuff that didn't seem worth the effort, like one on one communication and planning small protests. Trolls troll.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never cared about royals and would not have noticed if she took a year off, but the deception with the photo has me hooked on this story.

Same. I'd say my pre-photo interest in the royals was mild and entirely for fun. I have long enjoyed looking at the fashion. But I barely followed the whole Harry and Meghan thing. To me it was on par with most celebrity gossip -- a way to pass the time in a waiting room or on a plane, can be fun to chat with friends about, but not something I take seriously or think about almost at all the rest of the time.

The photo incident really grabbed my attention because I can't remember the last time a high profile public person did something that strange, press wise. I don't buy most of the theories about it (she's not dead, why would they hide this, and the divorce/affair rumors are all pretty ridiculous-sounding) but I am very curious to find out how that screw up happened and think there might be some kind of underlying scandal. Thus watching and waiting to see what it is, if anything.

I used to feel the same until I saw all the attacks on MM for dating/marrying Harry. I then got interested in how racist and awful British media was. I read Spare and it definitely makes me take notice of how exact the descriptions are for what is going on. Harry never bad mouthed Camilla but did say she had the most cunning PR team at her disposal (compared to the other royals). It's true there is never a negative story about her. They also trade stories with the press (you can post this if you kill that). Kate's PR is either turning on her or letting someone with less smarts and more power call the shots. The photo wasn't just edited here and there or to switch prints, they put Kate's face in from a magazine cover she had been in, so that makes it a bit wilder than a few blurry bits.

Less smarts + more power = William

Less smarts and more power than who, Camilla? Charles?

Oh you mean Harry? That's your conclusion?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have never cared about royals and would not have noticed if she took a year off, but the deception with the photo has me hooked on this story.

Same. I'd say my pre-photo interest in the royals was mild and entirely for fun. I have long enjoyed looking at the fashion. But I barely followed the whole Harry and Meghan thing. To me it was on par with most celebrity gossip -- a way to pass the time in a waiting room or on a plane, can be fun to chat with friends about, but not something I take seriously or think about almost at all the rest of the time.

The photo incident really grabbed my attention because I can't remember the last time a high profile public person did something that strange, press wise. I don't buy most of the theories about it (she's not dead, why would they hide this, and the divorce/affair rumors are all pretty ridiculous-sounding) but I am very curious to find out how that screw up happened and think there might be some kind of underlying scandal. Thus watching and waiting to see what it is, if anything.

I used to feel the same until I saw all the attacks on MM for dating/marrying Harry. I then got interested in how racist and awful British media was. I read Spare and it definitely makes me take notice of how exact the descriptions are for what is going on. Harry never bad mouthed Camilla but did say she had the most cunning PR team at her disposal (compared to the other royals). It's true there is never a negative story about her. They also trade stories with the press (you can post this if you kill that). Kate's PR is either turning on her or letting someone with less smarts and more power call the shots. The photo wasn't just edited here and there or to switch prints, they put Kate's face in from a magazine cover she had been in, so that makes it a bit wilder than a few blurry bits.

Less smarts + more power = William

Less smarts and more power than who, Camilla? Charles?

Oh you mean Harry? That's your conclusion?

Dp
You don't even make sense. Harry did not put out this mother's day photo as much as you wish to blame them yet again