Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at me-again is at it again, this time with Gloria Steinem. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-team-up-conversation-voting-representation-guest-appearance-dogs/

It must frustrate you endlessly that she is still getting free press and attention for just living her life. I mean -- wasn't it people like you who thought the public would be bored of her after the wedding, then it was after one year of marriage, then it was after the baby.

What is it now btw?

Huh? I’m calling her out on speaking with an actual feminist, when all she’s done is marry into royalty. Who exactly is going to vote because MM told them it was important?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Look at me-again is at it again, this time with Gloria Steinem. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-team-up-conversation-voting-representation-guest-appearance-dogs/

Ridiculous. MM has zero credibility as an activist or feminist. This conversation was absurd. No one would be giving her the time of day if she weren’t married to PH. No one.

[Anonymous]

Meghan renounced her US citizenship to become a British citizen when she married Harry. So, she cannot vote in any US election. That diminishes her credibility and relevance here in the US.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meghan renounced her US citizenship to become a British citizen when she married Harry. So, she cannot vote in any US election. That diminishes her credibility and relevance here in the US.

Lying doesn't look go on anyone - least of all you.

Meghan was in the process of dual citizenship which takes 5 years in the U.K. for a new spouse. She had no intentions of renouncing U.S. citizenship and if even she did - wouldn't do it before being granted U.K. citizenship in 2023.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meghan renounced her US citizenship to become a British citizen when she married Harry. So, she cannot vote in any US election. That diminishes her credibility and relevance here in the US.

Lying doesn't look go on anyone - least of all you.

Meghan was in the process of dual citizenship which takes 5 years in the U.K. for a new spouse. She had no intentions of renouncing U.S. citizenship and if even she did - wouldn't do it before being granted U.K. citizenship in 2023.

in the uk you don't have to renounce anything
only here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at me-again is at it again, this time with Gloria Steinem. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-team-up-conversation-voting-representation-guest-appearance-dogs/

Ridiculous. MM has zero credibility as an activist or feminist. This conversation was absurd. No one would be giving her the time of day if she weren’t married to PH. No one.

Exactly. She looks like a privileged idiot. Just because a writer and feminist is shown in the same frame as her in terms of interview or photograph does not mean the life long work of such an activist as Steinem is going to simply rub off on her.

What a total bozo the clown.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at me-again is at it again, this time with Gloria Steinem. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-team-up-conversation-voting-representation-guest-appearance-dogs/

Ridiculous. MM has zero credibility as an activist or feminist. This conversation was absurd. No one would be giving her the time of day if she weren’t married to PH. No one.

Exactly. She looks like a privileged idiot. Just because a writer and feminist is shown in the same frame as her in terms of interview or photograph does not mean the life long work of such an activist as Steinem is going to simply rub off on her.

What a total bozo the clown.

I actually feel secondhand embarrassment for Gloria here

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at me-again is at it again, this time with Gloria Steinem. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-team-up-conversation-voting-representation-guest-appearance-dogs/

Ridiculous. MM has zero credibility as an activist or feminist. This conversation was absurd. No one would be giving her the time of day if she weren’t married to PH. No one.

Exactly. She looks like a privileged idiot. Just because a writer and feminist is shown in the same frame as her in terms of interview or photograph does not mean the life long work of such an activist as Steinem is going to simply rub off on her.

What a total bozo the clown.

I actually feel secondhand embarrassment for Gloria here

Gloria Steinem should be embarrassed. How is someone who walked around in skimpy clothes carrying a suitcase and whose later claim to fame was marrying well a feminist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at me-again is at it again, this time with Gloria Steinem. https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-gloria-steinem-team-up-conversation-voting-representation-guest-appearance-dogs/

Ridiculous. MM has zero credibility as an activist or feminist. This conversation was absurd. No one would be giving her the time of day if she weren’t married to PH. No one.

Exactly. She looks like a privileged idiot. Just because a writer and feminist is shown in the same frame as her in terms of interview or photograph does not mean the life long work of such an activist as Steinem is going to simply rub off on her.

What a total bozo the clown.

I actually feel secondhand embarrassment for Gloria here

yeah, me too.

[Anonymous]

That interview is really cringe-worthy.

[Anonymous]

So considering she was dead quiet about any sexism in her own entertainment industry or during the MeToo movement, in general, why does she have a leg to stand on now? And she isn't starting small either. She's jumping right in to the Michelle Obama, Oprah, Gloria Steinem league.

Would anyone listen to her if she had married someone other than British royalty? It's like Ivanka thinking she was a diplomat by association.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So considering she was dead quiet about any sexism in her own entertainment industry or during the MeToo movement, in general, why does she have a leg to stand on now? And she isn't starting small either. She's jumping right in to the Michelle Obama, Oprah, Gloria Steinem league.

Would anyone listen to her if she had married someone other than British royalty? It's like Ivanka thinking she was a diplomat by association.

She has a platform and is using it. Whether she should have a platform is another question.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So considering she was dead quiet about any sexism in her own entertainment industry or during the MeToo movement, in general, why does she have a leg to stand on now? And she isn't starting small either. She's jumping right in to the Michelle Obama, Oprah, Gloria Steinem league.

Would anyone listen to her if she had married someone other than British royalty? It's like Ivanka thinking she was a diplomat by association.

She has a platform and is using it. Whether she should have a platform is another question.

But why now?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So considering she was dead quiet about any sexism in her own entertainment industry or during the MeToo movement, in general, why does she have a leg to stand on now? And she isn't starting small either. She's jumping right in to the Michelle Obama, Oprah, Gloria Steinem league.

Would anyone listen to her if she had married someone other than British royalty? It's like Ivanka thinking she was a diplomat by association.

At least Ivanka ran her own company for a bit. She’s done more than Meghan, which is saying a lot!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So considering she was dead quiet about any sexism in her own entertainment industry or during the MeToo movement, in general, why does she have a leg to stand on now? And she isn't starting small either. She's jumping right in to the Michelle Obama, Oprah, Gloria Steinem league.

Would anyone listen to her if she had married someone other than British royalty? It's like Ivanka thinking she was a diplomat by association.

At least Ivanka ran her own company for a bit. She’s done more than Meghan, which is saying a lot!

I went to college with Ivanka and I honestly don’t believe she ran anything. She is probably one of the most debilitatingly insecure people I have ever met and one of those people who just lies about the stupidest little things. So I’m sure her and Meghan are on about the same level.