new Reade/Biden thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

So we are allowed to doubt a woman who has changed her story more often than she has changed her name, which is a lot, and has defrauded a charity and lied in bankruptcy court? OK.

Sure, you are allowed to doubt her. I assume you will do the same for the next time an R is accused, because PP says that "we went back to doubting women"....even though the woman in PP's "story" never accused anyone of anything.

Um, yes she did. With signed statements and a news conference and everything. And why did you put “story” in quotes?

“But those "real allegations" appear to be even more problematic. At the news conference, Wohl distributed a document that was digitally signed, purportedly by the absent accuser Carolyne Cass, in which she said she had been sexually assaulted by Mueller in New York in 2010. In the interview this month, Wohl referred to Cass as a "real accuser" and called her allegations credible.“
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/26/robert-mueller-hoax-how-jacob-wohl-created-sexual-harassment-plot/2993799002/

So, now you are going to doubt women because of this false accusation? What will you do the next time an R is accused? Will you also doubt that one?

I’m going to doubt women who accuse men who get in the way of Trump, because now there’s a record of fans of his paying women to falsely accuse them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

So we are allowed to doubt a woman who has changed her story more often than she has changed her name, which is a lot, and has defrauded a charity and lied in bankruptcy court? OK.

Sure, you are allowed to doubt her. I assume you will do the same for the next time an R is accused, because PP says that "we went back to doubting women"....even though the woman in PP's "story" never accused anyone of anything.

Um, yes she did. With signed statements and a news conference and everything. And why did you put “story” in quotes?

“But those "real allegations" appear to be even more problematic. At the news conference, Wohl distributed a document that was digitally signed, purportedly by the absent accuser Carolyne Cass, in which she said she had been sexually assaulted by Mueller in New York in 2010. In the interview this month, Wohl referred to Cass as a "real accuser" and called her allegations credible.“
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/26/robert-mueller-hoax-how-jacob-wohl-created-sexual-harassment-plot/2993799002/

So, now you are going to doubt women because of this false accusation? What will you do the next time an R is accused? Will you also doubt that one?

I’m going to doubt women who accuse men who get in the way of Trump, because now there’s a record of fans of his paying women to falsely accuse them.

Then you should have said that, in your post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

That blogger sounds psychotic.

+100
I couldn't even get through that post. Sounds like a crackpot on the verge of a breakdown.

You mean Reade, right?

Pp must mean Reade. The blog was meticulously researched and documented.

By whom? Once again, who is the blogger and why should we place any credence in what they're churning out?

There are actual links to Reade’s own blogs and documents concerning her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Scammer blogger says two more installments are coming soon.

Who is this "scammer blogger" and has s/he been vetted? Why do you believe some random blogger? What are their credentials?

Don’t particularly need credentials because the blogger provides all the receipts, blogs, and court records. (Although the blogger says she’s a retiree who likes Jane Eyre.)

Bahahaha! If some anonymous blogger had posted all kinds of obsessive "information" about another accuser, liberals' heads would have exploded. The fact that you just take the word of ANYONE who follows your narrative speaks volumes.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

So we are allowed to doubt a woman who has changed her story more often than she has changed her name, which is a lot, and has defrauded a charity and lied in bankruptcy court? OK.

Sure, you are allowed to doubt her. I assume you will do the same for the next time an R is accused, because PP says that "we went back to doubting women"....even though the woman in PP's "story" never accused anyone of anything.

Um, yes she did. With signed statements and a news conference and everything. And why did you put “story” in quotes?

“But those "real allegations" appear to be even more problematic. At the news conference, Wohl distributed a document that was digitally signed, purportedly by the absent accuser Carolyne Cass, in which she said she had been sexually assaulted by Mueller in New York in 2010. In the interview this month, Wohl referred to Cass as a "real accuser" and called her allegations credible.“
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/26/robert-mueller-hoax-how-jacob-wohl-created-sexual-harassment-plot/2993799002/

So, now you are going to doubt women because of this false accusation? What will you do the next time an R is accused? Will you also doubt that one?

I’m going to doubt women who accuse men who get in the way of Trump, because now there’s a record of fans of his paying women to falsely accuse them.

Then you should have said that, in your post.

Which post? The one that everyone is assuming I posted about someone else years ago before fans of Trump ruined my trust in the MeToo movement?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Scammer blogger says two more installments are coming soon.

Who is this "scammer blogger" and has s/he been vetted? Why do you believe some random blogger? What are their credentials?

Don’t particularly need credentials because the blogger provides all the receipts, blogs, and court records. (Although the blogger says she’s a retiree who likes Jane Eyre.)

Bahahaha! If some anonymous blogger had posted all kinds of obsessive "information" about another accuser, liberals' heads would have exploded. The fact that you just take the word of ANYONE who follows your narrative speaks volumes.

Did you read it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

So we are allowed to doubt a woman who has changed her story more often than she has changed her name, which is a lot, and has defrauded a charity and lied in bankruptcy court? OK.

Sure, you are allowed to doubt her. I assume you will do the same for the next time an R is accused, because PP says that "we went back to doubting women"....even though the woman in PP's "story" never accused anyone of anything.

Um, yes she did. With signed statements and a news conference and everything. And why did you put “story” in quotes?

“But those "real allegations" appear to be even more problematic. At the news conference, Wohl distributed a document that was digitally signed, purportedly by the absent accuser Carolyne Cass, in which she said she had been sexually assaulted by Mueller in New York in 2010. In the interview this month, Wohl referred to Cass as a "real accuser" and called her allegations credible.“
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/02/26/robert-mueller-hoax-how-jacob-wohl-created-sexual-harassment-plot/2993799002/

So, now you are going to doubt women because of this false accusation? What will you do the next time an R is accused? Will you also doubt that one?

I’m going to doubt women who accuse men who get in the way of Trump, because now there’s a record of fans of his paying women to falsely accuse them.

Then you should have said that, in your post.

Which post? The one that everyone is assuming I posted about someone else years ago before fans of Trump ruined my trust in the MeToo movement?

The one that said "We went back to doubting women".

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

+100

[Anonymous]

This is what Reade told AP last year: "They have this counseling office or something, and I think I walked in there once, but then I chickened out."

If that is so, Biden's office would not have been notified of any complaint against him, and process would end

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

+100

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

+100

Glad you both will remember that your President is the one supported by ratf&cking frauds. You need more of that in your life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is what Reade told AP last year: "They have this counseling office or something, and I think I walked in there once, but then I chickened out."

If that is so, Biden's office would not have been notified of any complaint against him, and process would end

And there wouldn’t be a copy of anything in the Senate archives or at the University of Delaware. But I’m sure the search for a risotto recipe in a haystack will go on anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Scammer blogger says two more installments are coming soon.

Who is this "scammer blogger" and has s/he been vetted? Why do you believe some random blogger? What are their credentials?

Don’t particularly need credentials because the blogger provides all the receipts, blogs, and court records. (Although the blogger says she’s a retiree who likes Jane Eyre.)

Bahahaha! If some anonymous blogger had posted all kinds of obsessive "information" about another accuser, liberals' heads would have exploded. The fact that you just take the word of ANYONE who follows your narrative speaks volumes.

Did you read it?

I read as much as I could before the horrible misspellings and incorrect grammar chased me away. What a chore. But it *definitely* sounds like the kind of trash conspiracy theorists eat right up, so I can see why you're enjoying it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

+100

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reade is incredible - in every sense of the word. It’s ridiculous.
Read this - it’s a huge meticulously researched and documented compilation of all the crap she’s pulled.
http://ascammersnightmareisjustice.blogspot.com/2020/04/tara-reade-legacy-of-lies-part-one.html?m=1

Omg, her grifting just doesn’t stop. I only got a few paras in and was horrified. I’ll read the rest tonight, after work.

Sure, blame the victim.....how enlightened.

+ 1 million
Remember when doubters of a certain someone were labeled "victim-blamers, rape apologists, women-haters," etc.? That's quite a 180 these hypocrites have managed!

We went back to doubting women because Trump superfan Jacob Wohl paid women to accuse Robert Mueller of rape.
https://www.businessinsider.com/mueller-fbi-investigation-women-offered-money-false-claims-2018-10

Good to know that. Will remember that the next time an R is accused. No matter how many times/threads you post this in.

+100

Glad you both will remember that your President is the one supported by ratf&cking frauds. You need more of that in your life.

Oh, look! The "ratf&cking" poster is back! How we've missed your charming turn of phrase. Always keeping it klassy, amirite?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

For those of you who were insisting that no one says "believe all women"...well, this sure looks like they do.

+1
I would even say Biden believes more women than the hypocrites on this website do.

Since when does “presume she’s telling the truth” equate to “believe all women, regardless”?

Top pp, is English your native language?

Ok, I'll bite. What do YOU think Biden was saying in this quote? What qualifier is present in his statement?

Yes, I'd like to know this to. What is this imaginary qualifier that the PP is insisting Biden added?

And on another note, notice how the PP is mocking someone s/he assumes isn't a native English speaker? How xenophobic. How racist.