Pray for Charlotte, NC

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Dude I'm over here cracking up with co-workers about how you think somebody is supposed to do cartwheels cause you said you worked for nonprofits in high poverty/crime areas...
Who is angry - we over here having a ball; keep it up!!!

Coworkers? Shouldn't you be, like, IDK....working? Unless you're working for BLM, of course. And judging by some of your posts, it's not too much of a stretch to come to that conclusion.

Are you paid by the post, or the hour?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Right because all my years working for nonprofits in areas with high poverty and crime mean nothing.

Don't mean shit to me so yeah - you right on the money there!

So you don't care that people work towards actual solutions to inner city problems?

No I don't care about your self-aggrandizement. You can boast about being the Last Grand Master of the Knights Templar - I don't care.

I feel bad for you. You are so angry you cannot look passed your need to personally attack someone.

Dude I'm over here cracking up with co-workers about how you think somebody is supposed to do cartwheels cause you said you worked for nonprofits in high poverty/crime areas...
Who is angry - we over here having a ball; keep it up!!!

I didn't ask for cartwheels. I simply corrected you.

Still find it sad that you ridicule any attempt at a solution.

A solution to what?
Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

I gave examples of how community outreach programs with the police department coupled with community building can turn a neighborhood around. I worked for organizations that did the latter and saw real results. A reduction in crime, a boost in education, a better relationship between police and community. Better training for officers. Less arrests and more programs to help the every day citizen.

One of the biggest projects I worked with focused on several impoverished crime ridden neighborhoods in Los Angeles in the mid 1990s. Where if you were a latino (like I myself am) you often found yourself on the "wrong end of an officer's nightstick" and had a propensity for "getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested". The result? A better educated and trained police force. A higher standard of education. A renewed commercial district and better local jobs. A reduction in gang activity. Less officer deaths/injuries and less officer involved shootings.

It will take effort on both the police department and the community to solve the problems we are seeing now.

Now go ahead and ridicule me and tell me how I don't know anything or don't try to work towards a better standard of living for impoverished communities.

You have the last word.

I'm sorry I wasn't paying attention - sounded like the same lip service every other self-aggrandizing egoist spouts when they claim to have all the answers so I just tuned out after the first sentence.
But yeah, yeah...kudos, whatever.

Thank you for the apology. Accepted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Dude I'm over here cracking up with co-workers about how you think somebody is supposed to do cartwheels cause you said you worked for nonprofits in high poverty/crime areas...
Who is angry - we over here having a ball; keep it up!!!

Coworkers? Shouldn't you be, like, IDK....working? Unless you're working for BLM, of course. And judging by some of your posts, it's not too much of a stretch to come to that conclusion.

Are you paid by the post, or the hour?

Unlike the rest of y'all self-centered desperately determined to be cyber-somebody's, I ain't interested in trying to impress anonymous entities online so you can come to whatever conclusion you like.
Don't change the fact that I'm the only one not pitching a fit cause (GASP!!) people aren't holding hands singing "Kumbaya" all throughout America. I know its horrible - heaven forbid chaos and conflicts occur in life cause y'all just ain't used to that stuff but hey...it happens.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

I wouldn't know institutional racism because I am hispanic white.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

Not exactly a new buzzword.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_racism

Institutional racism was explained in 1967 by Kwame Ture (formerly Stokely Carmichael) and Charles V. Hamilton in Black Power: The Politics of Liberation, stating that while individual racism is often identifiable because of its overt nature, institutional racism is less perceptible because of its "less overt, far more subtle" nature. Institutional racism "originates in the operation of established and respected forces in the society, and thus receives far less public condemnation that [individual racism]."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

I wouldn't know institutional racism because I am hispanic white.

Then why do you talk about something you know little about?

Si eres hispano, sabes perfectamente como funcionan las reglas de este pais...para TODOS, independientemente de la raza.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

I wouldn't know institutional racism because I am hispanic white.

Then why do you talk about something you know little about?

Si eres hispano, sabes perfectamente como funcionan las reglas de este pais...para TODOS, independientemente de la raza.

If you are the pp who said this: "Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post."

Then you obviously don't know the definition of systemic racism, institutional racism or how the rules of this country play out for citizens of certain races and ethnicities.

Take yourself back to Stormfront. They'll enjoy your posts there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

I wouldn't know institutional racism because I am hispanic white.

Then why do you talk about something you know little about?

Si eres hispano, sabes perfectamente como funcionan las reglas de este pais...para TODOS, independientemente de la raza.

If you are the pp who said this: "Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post."

Then you obviously don't know the definition of systemic racism, institutional racism or how the rules of this country play out for citizens of certain races and ethnicities.

Take yourself back to Stormfront. They'll enjoy your posts there.

Nope, I'm not that poster.

So let me tell you: stop the BS, please. We don't want it here.

Entiendes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oh you got a a solution to the disparity with which some citizens find themselves on the wrong end of an officer's nightstick than others?
You got a solution to the propensity for some citizens to end up getting shot dead by the police instead of apprehended and arrested?
Let's hear.

Step 1. Obey all commands given by the officer.

That Step 1 displays Systematic Racism, because apparently black Americans are genetically incapable of doing so.

For them, it's like saying Step 1. Jump to the moon.

It is actually called systemic racism. It can also be called institutional racism.

But your post?

Just plain ole racism.

I've seen that term "institutional racism" thrown around a lot lately. Is that the new buzz word? It's already overused.

Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post.

I wouldn't know institutional racism because I am hispanic white.

Then why do you talk about something you know little about?

Si eres hispano, sabes perfectamente como funcionan las reglas de este pais...para TODOS, independientemente de la raza.

If you are the pp who said this: "Sweetie, you wouldn't know institutional racism if you live in America. Go to Africa. ANYWHERE in Africa and you'll see it on full display, every day. In the USA, the only thing keep you from being successful in this country is YOU, not me or anyone else reading this post."

Then you obviously don't know the definition of systemic racism, institutional racism or how the rules of this country play out for citizens of certain races and ethnicities.

Take yourself back to Stormfront. They'll enjoy your posts there.

Nope, I'm not that poster.

So let me tell you: stop the BS, please. We don't want it here.

Entiendes?

Then why are you accusing me of knowing little about institutional racism? I was addressing the PP.

[Anonymous]

Blacks really did pick the wrong case to "make their point" and riot against. The more that comes out about Keith Scott, the more it's apparent that the police acted appropriately and very likely saved their own lives. In addition to everything we now know - he was a ex-felon, served time in prison for shooting someone, had a stolen gun (which he defiantly refused to drop), and had his own wife file a protective order against him - it's now bing reported that the wide herself said "he's a killer" and "threatened to kill his family" in her complaint.

From the liberal Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/keith-scott-wife-threat_us_57eaec2ce4b082aad9b7c43f

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blacks really did pick the wrong case to "make their point" and riot against. The more that comes out about Keith Scott, the more it's apparent that the police acted appropriately and very likely saved their own lives. In addition to everything we now know - he was a ex-felon, served time in prison for shooting someone, had a stolen gun (which he defiantly refused to drop), and had his own wife file a protective order against him - it's now bing reported that the wide herself said "he's a killer" and "threatened to kill his family" in her complaint.

From the liberal Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/keith-scott-wife-threat_us_57eaec2ce4b082aad9b7c43f

Meant "wiFe"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blacks really did pick the wrong case to "make their point" and riot against. The more that comes out about Keith Scott, the more it's apparent that the police acted appropriately and very likely saved their own lives. In addition to everything we now know - he was a ex-felon, served time in prison for shooting someone, had a stolen gun (which he defiantly refused to drop), and had his own wife file a protective order against him - it's now bing reported that the wide herself said "he's a killer" and "threatened to kill his family" in her complaint.

From the liberal Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/keith-scott-wife-threat_us_57eaec2ce4b082aad9b7c43f

I coulda sworn blacks tried to "make their point" in other cases too...

Eric Garner


Tamir Rice


Walter Scott


Time and time again they tried to "make their point" - peacefully and positively - but the miscarriages of justice and incidents of unnecessary use of force still continue.
The riots weren't just about Keith Scott's case. They were a culmination of fatigue and frustration from seeing this crap happen over and over and over again.

[Anonymous]

But having violent riots in Keith Scott's case was wrong - and premature. It was based on the assumption that when a cop kills a black guy, the cop is always guilty. And isn't they what prejudice really is? Making assumptions and painting everyone in a particular group with a broad brush, and condemning them without any facts?

The other cases you brought up were travesties. But the one with Scott weakens the point.

[Anonymous]

The USA is a big country and police are involved in many calls every day. Note this perp armed with a gun hijacked a car and then ended up in another's house via home invasion culminating in a 5 hour police stand off. Location: Montgomery County MD.

He was armed and police had to go in the house .
http://www.mymcpnews.com/2016/09/27/armed-carjacking-leads-to-barricade-suspect-in-custody/

Hmmm. culmination of fatigue and frustration from seeing this crap like this happen over and over and over again.