Greendland - why not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the most interesting is the congressional visit.

Let’s see republicans:
Thom Tillis Retiring
Lisa Murkowski Talking about becoming an independent


These “republicans” can not win their primaries because they are not welcome in the party.

This must scare the Europeans even more!

All it takes is 4 Republicans to vote their conscience and stop this madness (in both the House and Senate.). It’s frightening that they have not done so in the interest of preventing WWIII

Maybe it’s time that democrats get involved in funding pro-America Republican primary challengers.

[Anonymous]

FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

Is this a random fact thread?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

Is this a random fact thread?

The dung beetle is the strongest insect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Setting aside how he has gone about it, what's wrong with the idea of Greenland joining the US. It cannot be negative for the very small population over there, and could be positive for them. As for the US many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong?

1) it isn't for sale
2) the people who live there prefer the status quo

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

and?

The pension's board has a Ministry of Finance member, but 9/10 are non-government. This is an independent move undertaken by non-government actors, not a diplomatic decision. A private sector decision having nothing to do with the 56,000 people who live in Greenland.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Setting aside how he has gone about it, what's wrong with the idea of Greenland joining the US. It cannot be negative for the very small population over there, and could be positive for them. As for the US many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong?

1) it isn't for sale
2) the people who live there prefer the status quo

Look, I know that we got off on the wrong foot, but what’s wrong with your look joining my yard? You could even use my grill!

[Anonymous]

if someone wants to spout facts, here are a few...

74% of all of the insulin used in the USA comes from Denmark

100% of the Ozempic used in the USA comes from Denmark

15% of the shipping containers bringing imports to the US comes from Denmark.

Would be a shame if Denmark decided to halt this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Setting aside how he has gone about it, what's wrong with the idea of Greenland joining the US. It cannot be negative for the very small population over there, and could be positive for them. As for the US many many benefits. So, setting aside the rhetoric, what's wrong?

1) it isn't for sale
2) the people who live there prefer the status quo

Look, I know that we got off on the wrong foot, but what’s wrong with your look joining my yard? You could even use my grill!

POOL

[Anonymous]

Europe has no cards to play.

Thanks to Project Ukraine, Europe is now utterly dependent on U.S. gas/oil; that they've made Russia their boogeyman enemy and have literally destroyed pipelines that could have brought cheap natural gas from Russia to Europe.

Europe has no hard power; it's militaries are weak and ineffective.

Europe has no soft power -- no media, no social media, no tech industry, a rapidly deindustrializing economy (see energy issues), and, thanks to boneheaded immigration policies, severe internal turmoil that anyone could have easily predicted as a result of opening the floodgates to millions of foreigners that are not assimilating.

The path of ICBMs from Russia or China heading to the United States lies over the Arctic and mostly over Greenland. Greenland is part of North America -- Europe has no claim to it -- and it's of vital strategic interest to the United States.

Greenland will become part of the United States in the largest land acquisition since the Louisiana Purchase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Greenland has 56,000 total residents.

The NYPD could conquer Greenland with a few overtime shifts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Europe has no cards to play.

Thanks to Project Ukraine, Europe is now utterly dependent on U.S. gas/oil; that they've made Russia their boogeyman enemy and have literally destroyed pipelines that could have brought cheap natural gas from Russia to Europe.

Europe has no hard power; it's militaries are weak and ineffective.

Europe has no soft power -- no media, no social media, no tech industry, a rapidly deindustrializing economy (see energy issues), and, thanks to boneheaded immigration policies, severe internal turmoil that anyone could have easily predicted as a result of opening the floodgates to millions of foreigners that are not assimilating.

The path of ICBMs from Russia or China heading to the United States lies over the Arctic and mostly over Greenland. Greenland is part of North America -- Europe has no claim to it -- and it's of vital strategic interest to the United States.

Greenland will become part of the United States in the largest land acquisition since the Louisiana Purchase.

Haha, no.

They are going to be forced to remove Donnie before that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Europe has no cards to play.

Thanks to Project Ukraine, Europe is now utterly dependent on U.S. gas/oil; that they've made Russia their boogeyman enemy and have literally destroyed pipelines that could have brought cheap natural gas from Russia to Europe.

Europe has no hard power; it's militaries are weak and ineffective.

Europe has no soft power -- no media, no social media, no tech industry, a rapidly deindustrializing economy (see energy issues), and, thanks to boneheaded immigration policies, severe internal turmoil that anyone could have easily predicted as a result of opening the floodgates to millions of foreigners that are not assimilating.

The path of ICBMs from Russia or China heading to the United States lies over the Arctic and mostly over Greenland. Greenland is part of North America -- Europe has no claim to it -- and it's of vital strategic interest to the United States.

Greenland will become part of the United States in the largest land acquisition since the Louisiana Purchase.

Haha, no.

They are going to be forced to remove Donnie before that.

It would be laughable to see the Europeans try to "remove Donnie." But of course, they won't dare. Europe has become the lapdog of the United States.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:FAFO

*DANISH PENSION FUND AKADEMIKERPENSION TO EXIT US TREASURIES

Here's some more info.