Chances? Your guesses?

[Anonymous]

Something to pass the time while waiting another week. 130 nnat 128 CogAt 14 gbrs. Chances?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Something to pass the time while waiting another week. 130 nnat 128 CogAt 14 gbrs. Chances?

Like NNAT and GBRS. I saw similar scores accepted first round from 2016 and 2017 admission thread. Good luck.

[Anonymous]

In b/c of the 14 GBRS. I wouldn't stress about it.

[Anonymous]

Mid 120s scores, 13 GBRS. Chance me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Mid 120s scores, 13 GBRS. Chance me.

In your case, other information will be helpful, GBRS commentary, DRA, above grade level on report cards...etc. GBRS is high so you have a good chance tho.

[Anonymous]

I don’t even have to ask. WISC taken. Now I have the joy of waiting for that score ?

[Anonymous]

135 NNAT 126 coGat 13 GBRS chances of getting in the first round?

[Anonymous]

My kid was a 120 NNAT and 134 CoGAT. No idea about the GBRS score, I haven't seen anything come home about it. How do you find it? I'd guess her chances are pretty good, but who knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:My kid was a 120 NNAT and 134 CoGAT. No idea about the GBRS score, I haven't seen anything come home about it. How do you find it? I'd guess her chances are pretty good, but who knows.

You can request a copy of the submitted package through your AART. It will have the GBRS with commentary. Some schools will give it to you now and some make you wait.

[Anonymous]

Chance me:
- 123 Cogat,
- 13 GBRS with an identified Math strength,
- IEP for dyslexia, dysgraphia and ADHD,
- inconclusive WISC (yup - both GAI and FSIQ have too much variation to draw a conclusion) but with a 99.percentile VSI.
- not in 2nd Grade, principal requested us to refer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Chance me:
- 123 Cogat,
- 13 GBRS with an identified Math strength,
- IEP for dyslexia, dysgraphia and ADHD,
- inconclusive WISC (yup - both GAI and FSIQ have too much variation to draw a conclusion) but with a 99.percentile VSI.
- not in 2nd Grade, principal requested us to refer.

Apologies - that should read 99.5 percentile VCI (Verbal Comprehension Index) not VSI!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chance me:
- 123 Cogat,
- 13 GBRS with an identified Math strength,
- IEP for dyslexia, dysgraphia and ADHD,
- inconclusive WISC (yup - both GAI and FSIQ have too much variation to draw a conclusion) but with a 99.percentile VSI.
- not in 2nd Grade, principal requested us to refer.

Apologies - that should read 99.5 percentile VCI (Verbal Comprehension Index) not VSI!

If this is too personal you don't have to answer, but do you mind me asking what the point difference was between the GAI and FSIQ? I am new to all this and have never heard of that before.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chance me:
- 123 Cogat,
- 13 GBRS with an identified Math strength,
- IEP for dyslexia, dysgraphia and ADHD,
- inconclusive WISC (yup - both GAI and FSIQ have too much variation to draw a conclusion) but with a 99.percentile VSI.
- not in 2nd Grade, principal requested us to refer.

Apologies - that should read 99.5 percentile VCI (Verbal Comprehension Index) not VSI!

If this is too personal you don't have to answer, but do you mind me asking what the point difference was between the GAI and FSIQ? I am new to all this and have never heard of that before.

The issue was not the variation between FSIQ and GAI, it was that there was significant difference amoung the subtest scores that make up BOTH the GAI and FSIQ of more than 5 points. So, for example, within a single Index, scores varied from 21percentile to ninety one percentile. The tester this felt that neither FSIQ of GAI was an adequate measure of intellectual ability.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Chance me:
- 123 Cogat,
- 13 GBRS with an identified Math strength,
- IEP for dyslexia, dysgraphia and ADHD,
- inconclusive WISC (yup - both GAI and FSIQ have too much variation to draw a conclusion) but with a 99.percentile VSI.
- not in 2nd Grade, principal requested us to refer.

Apologies - that should read 99.5 percentile VCI (Verbal Comprehension Index) not VSI!

If this is too personal you don't have to answer, but do you mind me asking what the point difference was between the GAI and FSIQ? I am new to all this and have never heard of that before.

The issue was not the variation between FSIQ and GAI, it was that there was significant difference amoung the subtest scores that make up BOTH the GAI and FSIQ of more than 5 points. So, for example, within a single Index, scores varied from 21percentile to ninety one percentile. The tester this felt that neither FSIQ of GAI was an adequate measure of intellectual ability.

Neuropsychologist here - 5 points is NOT a significant variation. You will have strengths and weaknesses within the subtests. Variations over 2 SD is significant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
The issue was not the variation between FSIQ and GAI, it was that there was significant difference amoung the subtest scores that make up BOTH the GAI and FSIQ of more than 5 points. So, for example, within a single Index, scores varied from 21percentile to ninety one percentile. The tester this felt that neither FSIQ of GAI was an adequate measure of intellectual ability.

Neuropsychologist here - 5 points is NOT a significant variation. You will have strengths and weaknesses within the subtests. Variations over 2 SD is significant.

New poster here, but even then, is a 2 SD difference necessarily problematic? Both of my kids had huge variations within the WMI. One had a 3 SD difference between picture span (16) and digit span (7), and the other had a 2.7 difference, with digit span of 18 and picture span of 10. The psychologist didn't necessarily see this as a problem, other than as a possible red flag for ADHD for the kid with the low digit span.