Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

A couple of specific women, then girls, said he did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

When all signs point to him being involved, intimately, why do you believe this?

Either way he should be impeached and sent to jail, but your refusal to see reality seems weird.

Can you be specific? it’s clear that he was close to Epstein and likely knew exactly what he was doing. Unclear beyond that.

The obfuscation, delays and redactions are a little bit of a tell, no?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

When all signs point to him being involved, intimately, why do you believe this?

Either way he should be impeached and sent to jail, but your refusal to see reality seems weird.

Can you be specific? it’s clear that he was close to Epstein and likely knew exactly what he was doing. Unclear beyond that.

A woman has been stating for years that Trump raped her when she was 13 and NO, she’s not lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

When all signs point to him being involved, intimately, why do you believe this?

Either way he should be impeached and sent to jail, but your refusal to see reality seems weird.

Can you be specific? it’s clear that he was close to Epstein and likely knew exactly what he was doing. Unclear beyond that.

Years ago the Miami Herald did an investigation and there’s loads of evidence Trump’s a rapist and a pedophile. We’ve seen creepy photos and heard dozens of women say he’s a creepy abuser.

Defending him makes you look either stupid or tells everyone you’re a pedophile too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

TBH, I actually thought he was telling the truth. Which is why it didn't look great for the Admin. If he were a good liar, he could have painted a better picture.

She asked a great question about whether a photo was redacted because the DOJ believed the person in the picture with Trump was a victim. It was a perfectly reasonable follow up to the prior answers he'd given, and he didn't dodge or get angry. He fumbled and gave an answer that was probably truthful though wholly unsatisfying because it does not exculpate the President.

I kind of doubt there is a smoking gun of pedophilia for Trump in the files. If there were, I'm on the fence as to whether that would end his career. People are too invested in not being wrong about him. I'm glad the files are coming to light, especially because maybe it's a path toward holding some powerful men accountable. But I just don't believe they will be Trump's downfall. There is no doubt he is crude and sexist and he ogles young girls. And there is no doubt he does things like cheat on his wife. If anything character-related could sink him, it already would have. He's also a convicted felon, and no one cares.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

TBH, I actually thought he was telling the truth. Which is why it didn't look great for the Admin. If he were a good liar, he could have painted a better picture.

She asked a great question about whether a photo was redacted because the DOJ believed the person in the picture with Trump was a victim. It was a perfectly reasonable follow up to the prior answers he'd given, and he didn't dodge or get angry. He fumbled and gave an answer that was probably truthful though wholly unsatisfying because it does not exculpate the President.

I kind of doubt there is a smoking gun of pedophilia for Trump in the files. If there were, I'm on the fence as to whether that would end his career. People are too invested in not being wrong about him. I'm glad the files are coming to light, especially because maybe it's a path toward holding some powerful men accountable. But I just don't believe they will be Trump's downfall. There is no doubt he is crude and sexist and he ogles young girls. And there is no doubt he does things like cheat on his wife. If anything character-related could sink him, it already would have. He's also a convicted felon, and no one cares.

I don't doubt he is what m y dad called a "tomcat," but I don't believe he is a pedophile or rapist. E Jean Carroll case was bogus. Anyone who believes her just wants to believe her and knows little about her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

TBH, I actually thought he was telling the truth. Which is why it didn't look great for the Admin. If he were a good liar, he could have painted a better picture.

She asked a great question about whether a photo was redacted because the DOJ believed the person in the picture with Trump was a victim. It was a perfectly reasonable follow up to the prior answers he'd given, and he didn't dodge or get angry. He fumbled and gave an answer that was probably truthful though wholly unsatisfying because it does not exculpate the President.

I kind of doubt there is a smoking gun of pedophilia for Trump in the files. If there were, I'm on the fence as to whether that would end his career. People are too invested in not being wrong about him. I'm glad the files are coming to light, especially because maybe it's a path toward holding some powerful men accountable. But I just don't believe they will be Trump's downfall. There is no doubt he is crude and sexist and he ogles young girls. And there is no doubt he does things like cheat on his wife. If anything character-related could sink him, it already would have. He's also a convicted felon, and no one cares.

I don't doubt he is what m y dad called a "tomcat," but I don't believe he is a pedophile or rapist. E Jean Carroll case was bogus. Anyone who believes her just wants to believe her and knows little about her.

Cult members will defend Trump even if he molests a minor in broad daylight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

When all signs point to him being involved, intimately, why do you believe this?

Either way he should be impeached and sent to jail, but your refusal to see reality seems weird.

Can you be specific? it’s clear that he was close to Epstein and likely knew exactly what he was doing. Unclear beyond that.

Years ago the Miami Herald did an investigation and there’s loads of evidence Trump’s a rapist and a pedophile. We’ve seen creepy photos and heard dozens of women say he’s a creepy abuser.

Defending him makes you look either stupid or tells everyone you’re a pedophile too.

His first wife accused him of rape in their divorce, before he bought her silence…and eventually buried her on his golf course for a tax break.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Yup.

What legal justification is there for removing Trump's and Sergey Brin's names? They only need to redact victims.

This alone should be used to impeach Bondi, or hold her and her deputy in contempt of Congress .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

Except some of the victims said they did have experiences with Trump.

Did they testify under oath?

Here is Jane Doe who filed a suit against trump accusing him of raping her when she was 13. Suit was withdrawn when her life was threatened

AI generated:

"A woman, identified by the pseudonym "Jane Doe" (also named as Katie Johnson in an initial filing), filed a federal lawsuit in 2016 accusing Donald Trump of raping her when she was 13 years old at parties hosted by Jeffrey Epstein. She withdrew the lawsuit in November 2016, with her attorney citing death threats as the reason.
Details of the Lawsuit and Withdrawal
Allegations: The lawsuit alleged that in 1994, when the plaintiff was an aspiring teen model, she was lured to Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence and was sexually assaulted and raped by both Epstein and Trump on multiple occasions. The lawsuit claimed that after one incident, Trump threatened her and her family with physical harm or death if she ever revealed what happened.
Legal Process:
An initial version of the lawsuit was filed in California in April 2016 but was dismissed on technical grounds.
A second version was filed in New York in June 2016 using the pseudonym "Jane Doe".
A final version was filed in September 2016.
Withdrawal: The lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed just days before the 2016 presidential election. A press conference where the accuser was expected to go public was abruptly canceled because she was "in terrible fear" after receiving numerous threats. Her lawyer, Lisa Bloom, stated that every woman makes her own choice and wished her well.
Outcome: The case did not proceed to trial, and the factual claims were never adjudicated in court. Donald Trump denied the allegations, calling them a "complete fabrication" and politically motivated. The woman has not spoken publicly since the lawsuit was dropped in 2016.
The circumstances surrounding the case have been described as unusual, with some reports linking the lawsuits to a former tabloid talk show producer which raised questions about their origins, but her lawyers maintained they believed her account.

[Anonymous]

Photo of Trump removed by DOJ has been reposted.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/12/21/us/trump-news?smid=nytcore-android-share

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

TBH, I actually thought he was telling the truth. Which is why it didn't look great for the Admin. If he were a good liar, he could have painted a better picture.

She asked a great question about whether a photo was redacted because the DOJ believed the person in the picture with Trump was a victim. It was a perfectly reasonable follow up to the prior answers he'd given, and he didn't dodge or get angry. He fumbled and gave an answer that was probably truthful though wholly unsatisfying because it does not exculpate the President.

I kind of doubt there is a smoking gun of pedophilia for Trump in the files. If there were, I'm on the fence as to whether that would end his career. People are too invested in not being wrong about him. I'm glad the files are coming to light, especially because maybe it's a path toward holding some powerful men accountable. But I just don't believe they will be Trump's downfall. There is no doubt he is crude and sexist and he ogles young girls. And there is no doubt he does things like cheat on his wife. If anything character-related could sink him, it already would have. He's also a convicted felon, and no one cares.

I don't doubt he is what m y dad called a "tomcat," but I don't believe he is a pedophile or rapist. E Jean Carroll case was bogus. Anyone who believes her just wants to believe her and knows little about her.

Have you ever served on a jury? I have and jurors take their responsibility seriously. We hear all of the evidence, not just the highlights reported on the evening news. The verdict against trump was unanimous by a jury who heard both the plaintiff and defendant evidence and not a single juror believed Defendant trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

TBH, I actually thought he was telling the truth. Which is why it didn't look great for the Admin. If he were a good liar, he could have painted a better picture.

She asked a great question about whether a photo was redacted because the DOJ believed the person in the picture with Trump was a victim. It was a perfectly reasonable follow up to the prior answers he'd given, and he didn't dodge or get angry. He fumbled and gave an answer that was probably truthful though wholly unsatisfying because it does not exculpate the President.

I kind of doubt there is a smoking gun of pedophilia for Trump in the files. If there were, I'm on the fence as to whether that would end his career. People are too invested in not being wrong about him. I'm glad the files are coming to light, especially because maybe it's a path toward holding some powerful men accountable. But I just don't believe they will be Trump's downfall. There is no doubt he is crude and sexist and he ogles young girls. And there is no doubt he does things like cheat on his wife. If anything character-related could sink him, it already would have. He's also a convicted felon, and no one cares.

I want every sordid detail of his pedophilia on the front page of every newspaper and every news show and then I hope he commits suicide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Todd Blanche on Meet the Press today was pitiful. For once the always obsequious Kristen Welker asked Todd Blanche some tough questions and Blanche was incapable of lying with conviction.

TBH, I actually thought he was telling the truth. Which is why it didn't look great for the Admin. If he were a good liar, he could have painted a better picture.

She asked a great question about whether a photo was redacted because the DOJ believed the person in the picture with Trump was a victim. It was a perfectly reasonable follow up to the prior answers he'd given, and he didn't dodge or get angry. He fumbled and gave an answer that was probably truthful though wholly unsatisfying because it does not exculpate the President.

I kind of doubt there is a smoking gun of pedophilia for Trump in the files. If there were, I'm on the fence as to whether that would end his career. People are too invested in not being wrong about him. I'm glad the files are coming to light, especially because maybe it's a path toward holding some powerful men accountable. But I just don't believe they will be Trump's downfall. There is no doubt he is crude and sexist and he ogles young girls. And there is no doubt he does things like cheat on his wife. If anything character-related could sink him, it already would have. He's also a convicted felon, and no one cares.

I don't doubt he is what m y dad called a "tomcat," but I don't believe he is a pedophile or rapist. E Jean Carroll case was bogus. Anyone who believes her just wants to believe her and knows little about her.

Cult members will defend Trump even if he molests a minor in broad daylight.

Cult members are also the wife beaters, rapists, and pedophiles. All normal, healthy people can tell Trump is a sick bastard and don’t defend him.

Anyone who tells me they like Trump is not allowed within 10 feet of my kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

But…why?

Every action and reaction by Trump and the DOJ screams that Trump was heavily involved with Epstein and that Trump is guilty as hell.

If there was even a shred of evidence exonerating him, why would they be spending thousands of hours redacting his name? There is so much evidence that needs to be scrubbed of trumps name and image that it’s leaking out even after an army of FBI agents went through it and it was more recently reviewed. Incriminating files are still having to be removed from public view after all the scrutiny. It’s damning.

I think the incrimination is that he knew all about what Epstein was doing and was close to him. Not that he shared women with Epstein.

When all signs point to him being involved, intimately, why do you believe this?

Either way he should be impeached and sent to jail, but your refusal to see reality seems weird.

Can you be specific? it’s clear that he was close to Epstein and likely knew exactly what he was doing. Unclear beyond that.

Years ago the Miami Herald did an investigation and there’s loads of evidence Trump’s a rapist and a pedophile. We’ve seen creepy photos and heard dozens of women say he’s a creepy abuser.

Defending him makes you look either stupid or tells everyone you’re a pedophile too.

His first wife accused him of rape in their divorce, before he bought her silence…and eventually buried her on his golf course for a tax break.

After having someone push her down the stairs, no doubt. He’s too cheap to pay a hit man though. Probably just called in a favor or made a promise he wouldn’t keep.