Radicalized White Nationalists in Virginia

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We used to be proud of people who killed Nazis. Now Trump supporters have mixed feelings about that heritage while celebrating rebel traitors. Un-American as hell.

So you propose that it's open season to kill Americans who are Nazis? You think this is how a civil society of law conducts itself?

It would have saved more than 6 million people 70 years ago if Germany had taken that preemptive move. Perhaps we should pay attention to history and not repeat the same mistakes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Reading comprehension problems? I didn't say it's okay. But lets not twist the narrative into something it is not. It's very different to say "A violent group of people attacked innocent bystanders" versus "Two violent groups clashed."

Again, there is no excuse for violent behavior, people who acted out in violence against others, except in self defense, should be brought to justice and face the full consequence under our laws. This include white nationalists, Nazis, Antifa members, and BLM activists.

This is the same as saying "violence from all sides" and you know it. Only one side showed up armed with the intent to fight.

I feel certain they were also hoping to get footage or photos of law enforcement attacking the alt-right, so they could use it in their recruitment materials. It seems they've learned a few things from the likes of ISIS.

The right to peaceably assemble is one worth fighting for. It's a despicable and diabolical mindset that uses that right to assemble with weapons and intent to use them.

I've never wanted to see people stripped of their citizenship before now. Round this trash up, drive them to the Mexico border and make them walk over to Nuevo Laredo.

Mexico doesn't want them.

[Anonymous]

Complete lunacy for anyone to have gone out to that event. You obviously can't count on McAuliffe to allow the cops to protect you. Sad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Reading comprehension problems? I didn't say it's okay. But lets not twist the narrative into something it is not. It's very different to say "A violent group of people attacked innocent bystanders" versus "Two violent groups clashed."

Again, there is no excuse for violent behavior, people who acted out in violence against others, except in self defense, should be brought to justice and face the full consequence under our laws. This include white nationalists, Nazis, Antifa members, and BLM activists.

This is the same as saying "violence from all sides" and you know it. Only one side showed up armed with the intent to fight.

I feel certain they were also hoping to get footage or photos of law enforcement attacking the alt-right, so they could use it in their recruitment materials. It seems they've learned a few things from the likes of ISIS.

The right to peaceably assemble is one worth fighting for. It's a despicable and diabolical mindset that uses that right to assemble with weapons and intent to use them.

I've never wanted to see people stripped of their citizenship before now. Round this trash up, drive them to the Mexico border and make them walk over to Nuevo Laredo.

Wrong. The counter protestors showed up with chemical sprays and threw some of the first punches, per the WaPo.

That was an opinion piece. An opinion no different from yours, but not facts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Complete lunacy for anyone to have gone out to that event. You obviously can't count on McAuliffe to allow the cops to protect you. Sad.

I realize that the alt right final has a Fox News provided talking point. This isn't the fault of white supremacists, or Trump, or the alt-right, or the Judge who would not allow the City to move it to a more appropriate location for security or the poor misunderstood guy driving a car into pedestrians. It's McAuliffe's (because Hillary). But please link to the evidence that he prevented cops from doing their job. That they tried to intervene and were given a stand down order. Thanks!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

Yes, but you know that pepper spray is far more dangerous than a semi-automatic assault rifle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

It's all wrong. Just like punching someone in the face at school is wrong. Raping is wrong. Stealing is wrong. Killing is wrong. Some are worse than others, but all will get you into trouble.

Nah, there you are again with your false equivalence. Pepper spray gets you irritated eys. An AR gets you DEAD

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

Yes, but you know that pepper spray is far more dangerous than a semi-automatic assault rifle.

If I was going with the intention of attacking a guy with assault weapon, I would definately choose pepper spray to protect me (see also-- taking a knife to a gun fight).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

It's all wrong. Just like punching someone in the face at school is wrong. Raping is wrong. Stealing is wrong. Killing is wrong. Some are worse than others, but all will get you into trouble.

Nah, there you are again with your false equivalence. Pepper spray gets you irritated eys. An AR gets you DEAD

Guess we can assume you think it's fine to pepper spray someone at a rally.

[Anonymous]

White supremacists are awful and should be condemned. However, these anti-protesters in Seattle now are scary. Watching on MSNBC. One of the commentators was decrying the police armor --ignoring the fact that the people were getting in their faces and spraying silly string all over them. "Silly string may be harmless, but had they not had the helmets, etc, these people would have been pushing through.

I'm beginning to agree with Trump's comment: it is ALL sides. These Antifa people are scary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

It's all wrong. Just like punching someone in the face at school is wrong. Raping is wrong. Stealing is wrong. Killing is wrong. Some are worse than others, but all will get you into trouble.

Nah, there you are again with your false equivalence. Pepper spray gets you irritated eys. An AR gets you DEAD

Did you read? Not equivalent; still wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

It's all wrong. Just like punching someone in the face at school is wrong. Raping is wrong. Stealing is wrong. Killing is wrong. Some are worse than others, but all will get you into trouble.

Nah, there you are again with your false equivalence. Pepper spray gets you irritated eys. An AR gets you DEAD

Guess we can assume you think it's fine to pepper spray someone at a rally.

Guess we can assume that you think it's okay to put your car in drive and mow over a group of people at a rally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

It's all wrong. Just like punching someone in the face at school is wrong. Raping is wrong. Stealing is wrong. Killing is wrong. Some are worse than others, but all will get you into trouble.

Nah, there you are again with your false equivalence. Pepper spray gets you irritated eys. An AR gets you DEAD

Guess we can assume you think it's fine to pepper spray someone at a rally.

Guess we can assume you think it's okay to throw urine at someone at a rally. Or built some one with sticks and poles at a rally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:White supremacists are awful and should be condemned. However, these anti-protesters in Seattle now are scary. Watching on MSNBC. One of the commentators was decrying the police armor --ignoring the fact that the people were getting in their faces and spraying silly string all over them. "Silly string may be harmless, but had they not had the helmets, etc, these people would have been pushing through.

I'm beginning to agree with Trump's comment: it is ALL sides. These Antifa people are scary.

Silly string versus a ton of steel. Girl, you're funny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, just to be clear. Nazi assault weapons are fine.

Counterprotester pepper spray is a provocation.

Gotcha.

It's all wrong. Just like punching someone in the face at school is wrong. Raping is wrong. Stealing is wrong. Killing is wrong. Some are worse than others, but all will get you into trouble.

Nah, there you are again with your false equivalence. Pepper spray gets you irritated eys. An AR gets you DEAD

Guess we can assume you think it's fine to pepper spray someone at a rally.

Guess we can assume that you think it's okay to put your car in drive and mow over a group of people at a rally.

I said it was ALL wrong. Do you always try to prove points by twisting people's statements?