So, the Dems new talking point is that Trump and Vance are “weird”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2024 Trump just doesn’t have the same MAGA “it factor” as 2016 Trump. He’s senile and embarrassing. MAGAs won’t admit it, but it’s true.

This entire election is going to go down as one of the saddest in US history.

Anything north of “the end of American democracy” is cool with me.

We deserve better than that.

[Anonymous]

“Weird” is very effective at being dismissive. But it also deflects the discussion from the complete lack of substantive policy shared by the Harris team.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yeah, nothing weird about Vance and his “defense” of his wife against the racist MAGA trash.

How very Ginny Thomas’ sh*t family of him to say:

“Obviously she’s not a white person…but I love Usha, she’s such a good mom.”

She’s like, one of the good ones!

+1. Not— she’s a good person, wife, lawyer, partner, human, etc. She’s a good mom. The woman clerked for John Roberts. It’s great that she’s a good mom. But if you’re entire defense of the compete human being you dated and married before you had kids is “a good mom”? I have two kids. By far my biggest and best accomplishment was raising them. But, wow would I be pissed if people attacked me and my husband said “good mom,” instead of “amazing, interesting, accomplished person who has also been a great parent to our kids”. There is a huge difference. To him, his wife is a uterus. That it. It’s gross.

Weirdo.

Well said.

Does she get any credit for the fact that she was probably the family bread winner until she quit her job? A corporate attorney makes more than a Senator’s salary of about $185k. I know he made money off his novel but it sounds like ha didn’t do well as a VC. I guess Peter Thiehl had him on salary while he was being groomed for whatever he is now.

Who cares. She is awful. Total sell-out. Didn’t believe any of this BS but is willing to go along to hitch herself to Vance because she thought he would have power. Huge miscalculation.

I agree with you but you’d think he had some respect for the hand that feeds him. Note he wasn’t hired by a high profile law firm. He did have summer internships so he probably failed to impress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2024 Trump just doesn’t have the same MAGA “it factor” as 2016 Trump. He’s senile and embarrassing. MAGAs won’t admit it, but it’s true.

This entire election is going to go down as one of the saddest in US history.

It’s not sad until we know the outcome. I’m personally not going to be sad if this election ends Trump’s political career.

We need a thread about what we think Trump will do when he loses.

[Anonymous]

Outside of your liberal terminally online bubble this isn’t going to change anyone’s minds. For the past few years we’ve seen all the weird stuff Democrats celebrate and defend.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Outside of your liberal terminally online bubble this isn’t going to change anyone’s minds. For the past few years we’ve seen all the weird stuff Democrats celebrate and defend.

No, but it sure is getting under MAGA skins.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2024 Trump just doesn’t have the same MAGA “it factor” as 2016 Trump. He’s senile and embarrassing. MAGAs won’t admit it, but it’s true.

This entire election is going to go down as one of the saddest in US history.

It’s not sad until we know the outcome. I’m personally not going to be sad if this election ends Trump’s political career.

+1

I’ll be thrilled if we finally get our first woman POTUS.

[Anonymous]

Gonna get weirder, folks

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:2024 Trump just doesn’t have the same MAGA “it factor” as 2016 Trump. He’s senile and embarrassing. MAGAs won’t admit it, but it’s true.

This entire election is going to go down as one of the saddest in US history.

2016 was the worst so far. By far.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Weird” is very effective at being dismissive. But it also deflects the discussion from the complete lack of substantive policy shared by the Harris team.

It just emphasises her weakness. Gives appearance to temporary fill the void.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of your liberal terminally online bubble this isn’t going to change anyone’s minds. For the past few years we’ve seen all the weird stuff Democrats celebrate and defend.

No, but it sure is getting under MAGA skins.

It absolutely do nothing to republicans. It didn’t discourage them after Hillari called them deplorable. Why would calling them weird going to have any impact?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:“Weird” is very effective at being dismissive. But it also deflects the discussion from the complete lack of substantive policy shared by the Harris team.

???

She has a ton of policy on her website. Maybe check it out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Outside of your liberal terminally online bubble this isn’t going to change anyone’s minds. For the past few years we’ve seen all the weird stuff Democrats celebrate and defend.

No, but it sure is getting under MAGA skins.

It absolutely do nothing to republicans. It didn’t discourage them after Hillari called them deplorable. Why would calling them weird going to have any impact?

On behalf of every Harris supporter on DCUM, thank you for making it so abundantly clear that you are a bad faith actor posting from another country.