Kate Middleton in Hospital - Recovering from Surgery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

The reporter from London on The Today Show this morning said no cancer.

Well if the Today Show says so it must be true 😂😂

[Anonymous]

The Washington Post has this statement:

“The princess’ office at Kensington Palace didn’t offer further details, but said that her condition wasn’t cancerous. “

Have searched everywhere and this is as much as has been reported in the major media.

[Anonymous]

Maybe it was a hemorrhoid, or as as she’d call it, “a royal pain in the ass.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post has this statement:

“The princess’ office at Kensington Palace didn’t offer further details, but said that her condition wasn’t cancerous. “

Have searched everywhere and this is as much as has been reported in the major media.

It does seem odd that this detail was not in the official statement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They made a mistake saying anything at all. Should have just had her lay low for a few weeks. Now everyone has medical experience and is a super sleuth and is speculating. The lady deserves a LITTLE privacy -

If she wanted privacy, she shouldn’t have married into the family of tabloid royals. This is precisely what she wanted, strangers being distracted from their real problems and issues while zoning in on her irrelevant comings and goings.

She doesn't get to declare privacy when it suits her and while selling stories about other family members. Do people really give a hoot about what's wrong with her or are they just bored and have nothing else to talk about.

You are just mad you don't know the details. Meanwhile good people are just wishing her and King George well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They made a mistake saying anything at all. Should have just had her lay low for a few weeks. Now everyone has medical experience and is a super sleuth and is speculating. The lady deserves a LITTLE privacy -

If she wanted privacy, she shouldn’t have married into the family of tabloid royals. This is precisely what she wanted, strangers being distracted from their real problems and issues while zoning in on her irrelevant comings and goings.

I don't think these are the rules..lol

[Anonymous]

This is obviously incredibly serious and I hope that the press and public are able to respect their wishes around her recovery. It’s so sad that they needed to dedicate much of this statement to the potential violation of her most basic privacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

The reporter from London on The Today Show this morning said no cancer.

Well that's good, because all Londoners got a secret email that we in DC didn't get, so surely he's right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Washington Post has this statement:

“The princess’ office at Kensington Palace didn’t offer further details, but said that her condition wasn’t cancerous. “

Have searched everywhere and this is as much as has been reported in the major media.

It does seem odd that this detail was not in the official statement.

It’s interesting that the official statement from the royal family explicitly states that Charles’s condition is “benign”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is digestive related since that is the expertise of this particular hospital and team of doctors. And some of those surgeries can indeed require lengthy recoveries that fit with the timeline set out. Makes the most sense.

The plastic surgery or "injury" crowd seem a bit far afield.

What digestive-related surgery would possibly require that long of a hospital stay and recovery?

Colon resection can be required for a variety of reasons. Hospital stay and recovery from that surgery can be 2 weeks for a variety of reasons.

Agree that was my first thought. She could have an colo/ileostomy may be temporary or permanent depending. She could have severe diverticulitis/osis, colitis, etc. This could require an extended hospital stay, not usually 14 days or whatever they’re saying though. That’s almost unheard of with any surgery.

Nobody wants to be out hugging strangers and greeting crowds with an ostomy bag.

My friend’s husband had one for a long time and was very sensitive about the smell of it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is digestive related since that is the expertise of this particular hospital and team of doctors. And some of those surgeries can indeed require lengthy recoveries that fit with the timeline set out. Makes the most sense.

The plastic surgery or "injury" crowd seem a bit far afield.

What digestive-related surgery would possibly require that long of a hospital stay and recovery?

Colon resection can be required for a variety of reasons. Hospital stay and recovery from that surgery can be 2 weeks for a variety of reasons.

Agree that was my first thought. She could have an colo/ileostomy may be temporary or permanent depending. She could have severe diverticulitis/osis, colitis, etc. This could require an extended hospital stay, not usually 14 days or whatever they’re saying though. That’s almost unheard of with any surgery.

Nobody wants to be out hugging strangers and greeting crowds with an ostomy bag.

My friend’s husband had one for a long time and was very sensitive about the smell of it.

That is a little weird because they don't smell...

[Anonymous]

The pic of William driving home from the hospital is concerning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have Crohn's and I was in the hospital for 14 days because of a bowel perforation and sepsis. I had another planned resection and for that I was in the hospital for 5 days? Six?

But it's important to keep in mind that I'm located in America (where they want you to leave the hospital ASAP), and I am not a royal, and the hospital was not fun. She is a princess, it would make sense for her to get, you know, the royal treatment in the hospital.

I was thinking it’s something like this^ for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The pic of William driving home from the hospital is concerning.

Could u post it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The pic of William driving home from the hospital is concerning.

Why?