Kate Middleton in Hospital - Recovering from Surgery

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do you think she will post updates?

You’ll the first person she’ll call.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They made a mistake saying anything at all. Should have just had her lay low for a few weeks. Now everyone has medical experience and is a super sleuth and is speculating. The lady deserves a LITTLE privacy -

If she wanted privacy, she shouldn’t have married into the family of tabloid royals. This is precisely what she wanted, strangers being distracted from their real problems and issues while zoning in on her irrelevant comings and goings.

She doesn't get to declare privacy when it suits her and while selling stories about other family members. Do people really give a hoot about what's wrong with her or are they just bored and have nothing else to talk about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Plot twist: Kate and Charles were hospitalized after stabbing each other in abdomen and prostate areas. Thoughts and prayers! End of discussion.

I love you. BEST post EVER!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They made a mistake saying anything at all. Should have just had her lay low for a few weeks. Now everyone has medical experience and is a super sleuth and is speculating. The lady deserves a LITTLE privacy -

If she wanted privacy, she shouldn’t have married into the family of tabloid royals. This is precisely what she wanted, strangers being distracted from their real problems and issues while zoning in on her irrelevant comings and goings.

She doesn't get to declare privacy when it suits her and while selling stories about other family members. Do people really give a hoot about what's wrong with her or are they just bored and have nothing else to talk about.

They are essentially a reality show so yes, people are bored and curious about them. It’s pretty much their job to get attention.

[Anonymous]

A double stabbing would make me tune in for another season of the crown

[Anonymous]

I do think that MEDICAL privacy should be afforded to everyone.

Is it really anyone's business what is going on inside one's body just because they are a royal?

I am thankful I wasn't famous when I had colon cancer as a 41 yo with 2 girls at home. I disclosed when I was ready to and on my own terms. I am very outspoken about it at this point, 5 years on (yes, I posted earlier)

If she's sick, she's sick. Let her be.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A double stabbing would make me tune in for another season of the crown

indeed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

Oh no! That’s not good.

[Anonymous]

I have wondered about the “not cancer” line too. Where exactly did that come from? I could see the BRF trying to cover that up, which would be the wrong thing to do. In my opinion, cancer or disclosing a major medical struggle would really humanize her and garner a lot of empathy from the public.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I do think that MEDICAL privacy should be afforded to everyone.

Is it really anyone's business what is going on inside one's body just because they are a royal?

I am thankful I wasn't famous when I had colon cancer as a 41 yo with 2 girls at home. I disclosed when I was ready to and on my own terms. I am very outspoken about it at this point, 5 years on (yes, I posted earlier)

If she's sick, she's sick. Let her be.

+100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

Oh no! That’s not good.

It came from a Royal source. It’s been widely attributed to Palace officials. It’s very clear that the official word is that it’s not cancer.

[Anonymous]

This is the official statement from the Royal Family. It does not mention cancer.

https://www.royal.uk/news-and-activity/2024-01-17/a-statement-from-kensington-palace

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

Oh no! That’s not good.

It came from a Royal source. It’s been widely attributed to Palace officials. It’s very clear that the official word is that it’s not cancer.

PP, can you provide a link please? It looks like the official statement does not address the question as to if it is cancer or not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Could be breast cancer. Maybe she has a port that needs tending.

They confirmed it’s not cancer.

I just heard on the news that the “not cancer” information came from “an unnamed source.”

The reporter from London on The Today Show this morning said no cancer.

[Anonymous]

I have Crohn's and I was in the hospital for 14 days because of a bowel perforation and sepsis. I had another planned resection and for that I was in the hospital for 5 days? Six?

But it's important to keep in mind that I'm located in America (where they want you to leave the hospital ASAP), and I am not a royal, and the hospital was not fun. She is a princess, it would make sense for her to get, you know, the royal treatment in the hospital.