Consolidated VA Elections Thread

[Anonymous]

I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Splitting the ticket. I’m fine with our D delegate. Need to look more closely at the Attorney General candidates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.

B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.

C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.

D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.

E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.

All roads lead to Terry.

It is being investigated right now. Stay tuned to the news.

The news that releases on Wednesday, November 3rd at 8:00AM? Because it takes 72 hours to look at a photo, ask your neighbor 'Hey Chad - isn't that that douche that went to Georgetown and works for so-and-so who lives down the hall?', and then confirm the spelling of their name on linkedin?

Social media already positively identified (allegedly) 4 of the instigators. And if that's not enough all they had to do was charge the allegedly Lincoln/Democrat operative conspirator with defamation and get her to actually name the instigators in an emergency court order. That's if she actually has a list she can pull out from somewhere.

+1
If social media was relied on to positively identity the Jan. 6 rioters, then the same standard should apply here.

The Trump insurrectionists are idiots who posted themselves on social media. And wore identifying clothes, etc. Certainly no one was charged without evidence.

You - the irrational mob - are all quick to judge and sentence without evidence.

And you owe those people an apology.

I’ll owe those people an apology when they identify the culprits with names and titles, and not before.

You owe them all an apology for stringing them up with no actual evidence.

For the two that have already been debunked you can do it right now.

Nope. Name the perpetrators. All of them. Right now. This is 'disgusting and disqualifying' and they shouldn't be able to get away with using traumatic events for their own games.

It was a shitty stunt. So I guess The Lincoln Project and the activists should pull out of the election. Oh wait. They aren’t running.

Two have been debunked which demonstrates just how invalid your “investigative approach” was.

Apologize, mob.

What are you talking about? They know exactly who these people are. Their names were all over Twitter on Friday.

No. A bunch of internet crazies threw out accusations based on little facts. Some didn’t even look the same.

Two have already been debunked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.

B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.

C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.

D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.

E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.

All roads lead to Terry.

It is being investigated right now. Stay tuned to the news.

The news that releases on Wednesday, November 3rd at 8:00AM? Because it takes 72 hours to look at a photo, ask your neighbor 'Hey Chad - isn't that that douche that went to Georgetown and works for so-and-so who lives down the hall?', and then confirm the spelling of their name on linkedin?

Social media already positively identified (allegedly) 4 of the instigators. And if that's not enough all they had to do was charge the allegedly Lincoln/Democrat operative conspirator with defamation and get her to actually name the instigators in an emergency court order. That's if she actually has a list she can pull out from somewhere.

+1
If social media was relied on to positively identity the Jan. 6 rioters, then the same standard should apply here.

The Trump insurrectionists are idiots who posted themselves on social media. And wore identifying clothes, etc. Certainly no one was charged without evidence.

You - the irrational mob - are all quick to judge and sentence without evidence.

And you owe those people an apology.

I’ll owe those people an apology when they identify the culprits with names and titles, and not before.

You owe them all an apology for stringing them up with no actual evidence.

For the two that have already been debunked you can do it right now.

Nope. Name the perpetrators. All of them. Right now. This is 'disgusting and disqualifying' and they shouldn't be able to get away with using traumatic events for their own games.

It was a shitty stunt. So I guess The Lincoln Project and the activists should pull out of the election. Oh wait. They aren’t running.

Two have been debunked which demonstrates just how invalid your “investigative approach” was.

Apologize, mob.

Alright, I'm sorry. Sorry that TMac couldn't pick better associates to pay to run his campaign black ops.

Uh. That says that TLP gave money to McAuliffe. Not the other way around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Splitting the ticket. I’m fine with our D delegate. Need to look more closely at the Attorney General candidates.

Miyares ads are ridiculous.

The R strategy of blaming McAuliffe and Herring for a sexual predator in LCPS schools is dishonest and vile.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

You don’t see any actual Dems here saying this. On the Internet, no one knows you’re a dog, remember?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^ just more democrats trying to sow race based hatred and animosity. Enough! Vote Youngkin for schools & common sense/decency!

I am not going to vote for him precisely because I think he will completely undermine public schools.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am still trying to get my head around Terry's campaign being blamed for a stunt orchestrated by republicans.

A) The stunt has been connected to Democrat operatives. Fact.

B) The stunt was set to make his rival look extremely bad and McAuliffe's poll numbers were sliding. Fact.

C) Public campaign oversight has shown that McAuliffe paid the Lincoln group during this campaign. Fact.

D) Several of the stunt instigators have been allegedly connected to the Democrat Party of Virginia.

E) National media, heavily left-leaning, refuse to investigate or identify the names or positions of the instigators even with clear pictures from multiple angles. Fact.

All roads lead to Terry.

It is being investigated right now. Stay tuned to the news.

The news that releases on Wednesday, November 3rd at 8:00AM? Because it takes 72 hours to look at a photo, ask your neighbor 'Hey Chad - isn't that that douche that went to Georgetown and works for so-and-so who lives down the hall?', and then confirm the spelling of their name on linkedin?

Social media already positively identified (allegedly) 4 of the instigators. And if that's not enough all they had to do was charge the allegedly Lincoln/Democrat operative conspirator with defamation and get her to actually name the instigators in an emergency court order. That's if she actually has a list she can pull out from somewhere.

+1
If social media was relied on to positively identity the Jan. 6 rioters, then the same standard should apply here.

The Trump insurrectionists are idiots who posted themselves on social media. And wore identifying clothes, etc. Certainly no one was charged without evidence.

You - the irrational mob - are all quick to judge and sentence without evidence.

And you owe those people an apology.

I’ll owe those people an apology when they identify the culprits with names and titles, and not before.

You owe them all an apology for stringing them up with no actual evidence.

For the two that have already been debunked you can do it right now.

Nope. Name the perpetrators. All of them. Right now. This is 'disgusting and disqualifying' and they shouldn't be able to get away with using traumatic events for their own games.

It was a shitty stunt. So I guess The Lincoln Project and the activists should pull out of the election. Oh wait. They aren’t running.

Two have been debunked which demonstrates just how invalid your “investigative approach” was.

Apologize, mob.

Alright, I'm sorry. Sorry that TMac couldn't pick better associates to pay to run his campaign black ops.

Uh. That says that TLP gave money to McAuliffe. Not the other way around.

Actually, to be clear, this shows that TLP spent A LOT of money against Youngkin ($280k) and a little supporting McAuliffe ($17k). This doesn't show ANY actual donations to McAuliffe's campaign.

https://www.vpap.org/committees/367571/indexpenditures/election/9913


And it certainly does NOT show McAuliffe's campaign paying TLP for anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:McAuliffe supporters know the L is coming on Tuesday.

Let’s not get smug and complacent. Smugness is entirely reserved for democrats anyway. Keep your fingers and toes crossed and please do what you can to get out the vote!

+1
I would love to see Youngkin win, but I would never be as arrogant as these Democrats, who have been insisting for months that their sleazeball of a candidate would trounce him. I don't think I've been as invested in an election in a long time! Very happy to see that at least it's extremely close.

Agreed!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Splitting the ticket. I’m fine with our D delegate. Need to look more closely at the Attorney General candidates.

Miyares ads are ridiculous.

The R strategy of blaming McAuliffe and Herring for a sexual predator in LCPS schools is dishonest and vile.

Agreed. Taken at face value, the ads suggest Miyares really doesn’t understand the position he’s running for.

In reality, I suspect he knows this but is counting on voters being too ignorant to understand the difference.

[Anonymous]

I think McAuliffe took dem votes for granted, and made some political missteps. I am none too pleased with the way he’s run his campaign. He has my vote because I don’t want Youngkin in office, but Terry needs to get his head out of his ass.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Straight R. I’m just not on board with democrats move towards extreme progressivism. Sending a message that they need to scoot back towards reason. Youngkin is a pretty bland guy who will be a middle of the road bureaucrat anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Splitting the ticket. I’m fine with our D delegate. Need to look more closely at the Attorney General candidates.

Miyares ads are ridiculous.

The R strategy of blaming McAuliffe and Herring for a sexual predator in LCPS schools is dishonest and vile.

Agreed. Taken at face value, the ads suggest Miyares really doesn’t understand the position he’s running for.

In reality, I suspect he knows this but is counting on voters being too ignorant to understand the difference.

I wouldn't be too sure about that. When someone tells you who they are, believe them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Splitting the ticket. I’m fine with our D delegate. Need to look more closely at the Attorney General candidates.

Miyares is incredible. Definitely do some research on him. You will be impressed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I see a lot of Dems here stating they are voting R for Youngkin for the first time. Question, just curious - are you voting a straight R ticket or splitting the ticket?

Splitting the ticket. I’m fine with our D delegate. Need to look more closely at the Attorney General candidates.

Miyares is incredible. Definitely do some research on him. You will be impressed.

DP. I’ve done research. Nothing about his accomplishments seems particularly impressive.