Forum Index
»
Soccer
With respect, I think you’re the one with making up a definition. A “trapped” player is one that is not playing with her grade and has no option to fix that because the cutoff precludes her from playing with her grade. There are different consequences of being trapped from time to time depending on what grade she and her teammates are in, but a Q4 kid playing in a BY system is always trapped, not just in the years with the most extreme consequences (e.g., mismatched recruiting cycles or HR play). |
You must have a better dictionary than I do because it was nowhere to be found in my websters. Regardless, the implications for my daughter getting established this year vs next at this age are huge. The ECNL teams are already established for 2012. We did GA this year (a mistake I'd rather not repeat). I'd like to get her into the ECNL ecosystem sooner than later but one, it'll be hard to disrupt a current team as a November bday if they are all older and in the system. Two, that's alot of effort for one year and we are there are tons of competitive teams so getting this figured out would likely change her development path. Not the end of the world but obviously better to do this asap. |
I wouldnt worry too much. The competivive balance will make sure your daughter has the options you want. 50% of ECNL Rosters in 24 months will be September to December. |
Good point and she's lucky it'll be her 8th grade year in 2026. |
Clubs who refuse to adapt won't win.... Just keep your daughter healthy and she will get her spot if she can play. Check out the 2013's if you want to see what she has to compete with. I know you will be happy after you do. |
Not true at all. |
Nope, maybe in 6 years when all thr youngers come up but not immediately. |
I've seen some seriously taleted kids try playing a year up and not sniff the field at a top 5 ECNL program in the country. I think people will be really shocked when RAE is layed out for all to see. This might be the best thing to ever happen to US youth soccer. |
An 11 year old 6th grader playing soccer at a reasonable high level will almost certainly be able to capitalize on opening spots in the next two years as they haven't been through the culling yet and will get a better chance at more playing time, better positions and better teams. Yeah, 14 year old 9th graders have been thinned out all ready and pushed to the side. |
I haven't read this whole thread, so maybe it's already been said. But this has zero effect on RAE other than to e the line. |
| My point was a top kid may become a bench kid. 6 months can have a drastic effect. Ive seen it for years. Alot of people will be really suprised. |
I think people will be surprised how much of a difference a year makes especially at the younger ages U16 and below. My daughter’s team played a 2012 top 5 team in the country that played up and we handled them. They had very athletic players. We are ranked around 100. There’s levels to this. And where they draw the lines definitely matters so I can see why people are fighting for their kids to benefit from this. |
Some here are convinced that Q3/Q4 players will rock when they play with their grade, especially since they made top teams against older kids as a younger player. Others think the development difference isn't that great especially the older you go and since all teams are aligning anyway, we won't see a huge change in birth month of the teams until later. Clubs who recruit are eager to try to gain an edge from the big change regardless, so they will say anything to get you on their team. |
Our 2012 team has occasional interclub friendlies with our 2013's and the score is about 4-0 and a friendly with our 2011's is about the same in favor of the 2011's. |
Don't worry. There's a guy that hangs around to remind us of just that anytime we mention BY going away. We get it. We know. We don't care. Nobody wants SY because it eliminates RAE. It's all about the trapped players and this stupid system we've created to try and get around them. |