Where’s Melania?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7:46- do you know her? Doubt it. You’re projecting a personality type on her. She looks reserved because of the pout. She looks reserved because she’s miserable. She looks reserved because she hates her husband. She wants to be back in NYC with no responsibilities except raising a son and looking the part of a trophy wife.

No, I don't know her. I don't know Michelle Obama or Laura Bush or Hillary Clinton either. Melania Trump does not exude warmth. The others do to a much greater degree.

I think many of the people, and children, whom she has been around would disagree with you.

PP here. I agree with you when she's around children, and I'm not saying she's not a kind and caring person. I think she is. I'm trying to say that she also presents with a shy reserve that (IMHO) would not be consistent with having facial plastic surgery that would generate a lot of public scrutiny. For whatever reason, she does not exude warmth to the public.

I think she's extremely shy.
-DP

As an extremely shy person i agree. I can spot someone from my own tribe.

someone is very self-centered.

[Anonymous]

I think she’s shy also. We are used to attention whores dominanting everything.

She doesn’t seek attention but gets attention because of her beauty and marriage.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think she’s shy also. We are used to attention whores dominanting everything.

She doesn’t seek attention but gets attention because of her beauty and marriage.

She was a model! How can a model not seek attention? She has responsibilities as first lady and, this far, all we have is "be best", one state dinner. She should give the job to Ivanka and Melania can go back to New York and Rumpus can pay for her security.

[Anonymous]

A model among thousands of models in NYC. Know the name of any other models in NYC, unless they are married to rich men/actors?

Nobody knew her name until she married Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Scheduled for Gold Star Family event tomorrow — closed to the press natch.

Good. Libs don’t care about Gold Star families, you just want to gawk at Melania.

For a 5,-time draft dodger tomeet with families of soldiers who have even served in the US armed forces is an insult; for him to meet with Gold Star families is an abomination.

As for his soft-core porn model gold-digger wife, I don't care where she is as long as the US taxpayer doesn't have to pay extra to protect her if she chooses to live outside the White House.

The Military loves Trump.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2017/10/23/military-times-poll-what-you-really-think-about-trump/

While almost 48 percent of enlisted troops approve of Trump, only about 30 percent of officers say the same, the poll shows.

Compare to Obama’s:

More than half of troops surveyed in the latest Military Times/Institute for Veterans and Military Families poll said they have an unfavorable opinion of Obama and his two-terms leading the military. About 36 percent said they approve of his job as commander in chief.

Their complaints include the president’s decision to decrease military personnel (71 percent think it should be higher), his moves to withdraw combat troops from Iraq (59 percent say it made America less safe) and his lack of focus on the biggest dangers facing America (64 percent say China represents a significant threat to the U.S.)

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/2017/01/08/the-obama-era-is-over-here-s-how-the-military-rates-his-legacy/

Troops responding to the Military Times/IVMF poll saw years of defense budget fights as the largest blemish on Obama’s presidency. Two-thirds said spending caps enacted in 2011 have had a very negative effect on military morale, and another 28 percent said it was harmful to a lesser extent. Fewer than two percent saw the budget caps as a positive for the military.


If you go to link you’ll see Obama was unpopular with Military and the Military thinks Obama’s politics and policies hurt the mission and morale.

News at 10: special interest group supports politician that wants to increase their budget

[Anonymous]

Special interest group? What are you smoking?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Special interest group? What are you smoking?

More than 50% of discretionary spending? ¯\_(?)_/¯

Lots of mansions in Loudon built with that money. Erik Prince says “hi”

[Anonymous]

Blackwater’s New Sugar Daddy: The Obama Administration

The CIA says it can't live without Blackwater. The State Department too. Could any of this be related to the big money Blackwater spends on Democratic lobbyists?

Blackwater has spent heavily on Democratic lobbyists in 2010 and clearly it has paid off. Despite the investigations, the indictments, the trail of dead bodies, George W Bush’s favorite mercenary company is thriving under the Obama Administration. After its original sugar daddy left town, Blackwater has happily remarried. Over the past two weeks, the Administration has awarded nearly a quarter billion dollars in new US government contracts to Blackwater to work for the State Department and CIA in Afghanistan and other hot zones globally.

In an interview Sunday on ABC’s "This Week," CIA Director Leon Panetta made it clear that the Agency is dependent upon private security companies to operate globally. But, not just any private security companies. Specifically, Panetta said, the CIA needs Blackwater.

"I have to tell you that in the war zone, we continue to have needs for security. You’ve got a lot of forward bases. We’ve got a lot of attacks on some of these bases. We’ve got to have security. Unfortunately, there are a few companies that provide that kind of security," Panetta told Jake Tapper. "So we bid out some of those contracts. [Blackwater] provided a bid that was underbid everyone else by about $26 million. And a panel that we had said that they can do the job, that they have shaped up their act. So there really was not much choice but to accept that contract." While Tapper specifically asked Panetta about Blackwater’s work in Afghanistan, the CIA contract is not limited to Afghanistan–it is a global contract.

https://www.thenation.com/article/blackwaters-new-sugar-daddy-obama-administration/

Really? Did you not know this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blackwater’s New Sugar Daddy: The Obama Administration

The CIA says it can't live without Blackwater. The State Department too. Could any of this be related to the big money Blackwater spends on Democratic lobbyists?

Blackwater has spent heavily on Democratic lobbyists in 2010 and clearly it has paid off. Despite the investigations, the indictments, the trail of dead bodies, George W Bush’s favorite mercenary company is thriving under the Obama Administration. After its original sugar daddy left town, Blackwater has happily remarried. Over the past two weeks, the Administration has awarded nearly a quarter billion dollars in new US government contracts to Blackwater to work for the State Department and CIA in Afghanistan and other hot zones globally.

In an interview Sunday on ABC’s "This Week," CIA Director Leon Panetta made it clear that the Agency is dependent upon private security companies to operate globally. But, not just any private security companies. Specifically, Panetta said, the CIA needs Blackwater.

"I have to tell you that in the war zone, we continue to have needs for security. You’ve got a lot of forward bases. We’ve got a lot of attacks on some of these bases. We’ve got to have security. Unfortunately, there are a few companies that provide that kind of security," Panetta told Jake Tapper. "So we bid out some of those contracts. [Blackwater] provided a bid that was underbid everyone else by about $26 million. And a panel that we had said that they can do the job, that they have shaped up their act. So there really was not much choice but to accept that contract." While Tapper specifically asked Panetta about Blackwater’s work in Afghanistan, the CIA contract is not limited to Afghanistan–it is a global contract.

https://www.thenation.com/article/blackwaters-new-sugar-daddy-obama-administration/

Really? Did you not know this?

The same Blackwater that Erik Prince had to sell and rebrand because they were persona non grata?

Keep smoking that pipe, buddy. He made the vast majority of his fortune under Republicans.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Blackwater’s New Sugar Daddy: The Obama Administration

The CIA says it can't live without Blackwater. The State Department too. Could any of this be related to the big money Blackwater spends on Democratic lobbyists?

Blackwater has spent heavily on Democratic lobbyists in 2010 and clearly it has paid off. Despite the investigations, the indictments, the trail of dead bodies, George W Bush’s favorite mercenary company is thriving under the Obama Administration. After its original sugar daddy left town, Blackwater has happily remarried. Over the past two weeks, the Administration has awarded nearly a quarter billion dollars in new US government contracts to Blackwater to work for the State Department and CIA in Afghanistan and other hot zones globally.

In an interview Sunday on ABC’s "This Week," CIA Director Leon Panetta made it clear that the Agency is dependent upon private security companies to operate globally. But, not just any private security companies. Specifically, Panetta said, the CIA needs Blackwater.

"I have to tell you that in the war zone, we continue to have needs for security. You’ve got a lot of forward bases. We’ve got a lot of attacks on some of these bases. We’ve got to have security. Unfortunately, there are a few companies that provide that kind of security," Panetta told Jake Tapper. "So we bid out some of those contracts. [Blackwater] provided a bid that was underbid everyone else by about $26 million. And a panel that we had said that they can do the job, that they have shaped up their act. So there really was not much choice but to accept that contract." While Tapper specifically asked Panetta about Blackwater’s work in Afghanistan, the CIA contract is not limited to Afghanistan–it is a global contract.

https://www.thenation.com/article/blackwaters-new-sugar-daddy-obama-administration/

Really? Did you not know this?

Erik Prince sold Blackwater in 2010.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A model among thousands of models in NYC. Know the name of any other models in NYC, unless they are married to rich men/actors?

Nobody knew her name until she married Trump.

Coco Rocha, Carolyn Murphy, Hillary Rhoda, Karlie Kloss, Ashley Graham....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:


The Military loves Trump.

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2017/10/23/military-times-poll-what-you-really-think-about-trump/

While almost 48 percent of enlisted troops approve of Trump, only about 30 percent of officers say the same, the poll shows.

Compare to Obama’s:

More than half of troops surveyed in the latest Military Times/Institute for Veterans and Military Families poll said they have an unfavorable opinion of Obama and his two-terms leading the military. About 36 percent said they approve of his job as commander in chief.

Their complaints include the president’s decision to decrease military personnel (71 percent think it should be higher), his moves to withdraw combat troops from Iraq (59 percent say it made America less safe) and his lack of focus on the biggest dangers facing America (64 percent say China represents a significant threat to the U.S.)

https://www.militarytimes.com/news/2017/01/08/the-obama-era-is-over-here-s-how-the-military-rates-his-legacy/

Troops responding to the Military Times/IVMF poll saw years of defense budget fights as the largest blemish on Obama’s presidency. Two-thirds said spending caps enacted in 2011 have had a very negative effect on military morale, and another 28 percent said it was harmful to a lesser extent. Fewer than two percent saw the budget caps as a positive for the military.


If you go to link you’ll see Obama was unpopular with Military and the Military thinks Obama’s politics and policies hurt the mission and morale.

Lordy do we need more math education in this country.
The way you throw around statistics is frightening.
Let's rephrase some of what's above:

While almost 48 percent of enlisted troops approve of Trump, only about 30 percent of officers say the same, the poll shows.
More than half of troops surveyed in the latest Military Times/Institute for Veterans and Military Families poll said they have an unfavorable opinion of Obama.


Note that if 48% of enlisted troops and 30% of officers approve of Trump, that means that the exact same sentence applies to both Trump and Obama:
Fewer than half the troops approve of the President.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blackwater’s New Sugar Daddy: The Obama Administration

The CIA says it can't live without Blackwater. The State Department too. Could any of this be related to the big money Blackwater spends on Democratic lobbyists?

Blackwater has spent heavily on Democratic lobbyists in 2010 and clearly it has paid off. Despite the investigations, the indictments, the trail of dead bodies, George W Bush’s favorite mercenary company is thriving under the Obama Administration. After its original sugar daddy left town, Blackwater has happily remarried. Over the past two weeks, the Administration has awarded nearly a quarter billion dollars in new US government contracts to Blackwater to work for the State Department and CIA in Afghanistan and other hot zones globally.

In an interview Sunday on ABC’s "This Week," CIA Director Leon Panetta made it clear that the Agency is dependent upon private security companies to operate globally. But, not just any private security companies. Specifically, Panetta said, the CIA needs Blackwater.

"I have to tell you that in the war zone, we continue to have needs for security. You’ve got a lot of forward bases. We’ve got a lot of attacks on some of these bases. We’ve got to have security. Unfortunately, there are a few companies that provide that kind of security," Panetta told Jake Tapper. "So we bid out some of those contracts. [Blackwater] provided a bid that was underbid everyone else by about $26 million. And a panel that we had said that they can do the job, that they have shaped up their act. So there really was not much choice but to accept that contract." While Tapper specifically asked Panetta about Blackwater’s work in Afghanistan, the CIA contract is not limited to Afghanistan–it is a global contract.

https://www.thenation.com/article/blackwaters-new-sugar-daddy-obama-administration/

Really? Did you not know this?

The same Blackwater that Erik Prince had to sell and rebrand because they were persona non grata?

Keep smoking that pipe, buddy. He made the vast majority of his fortune under Republicans.

What we are seeing clearly is the Obama administration not only using Blackwater in sensitive operations globally, but actively defending the company’s continued existence as a government contractor in good standing. Just look at the report about Blackwater and Sudan. According to McClatchy‘s investigation, two former senior U.S. officials said Blackwater "at one point proposed a broad defense package [for Southern Sudan’s Christian forces] that would have required the south to pledge as much as half its mineral wealth to pay for Blackwater’s services." According to McClatchy, "Had the company been indicted, it could have been suspended from doing business with the U.S. government, and a conviction could have brought debarment from all government contracts, including providing guard services for the CIA and State Department in war zones." Instead of indicting the company, the Justice Department protected Blackwater and opted for a settlement rather than a criminal prosecution thus ensuring the company could continute to work for the US government.

No one is paying any attention to what should be a major part of the story of Blackwater’s thriving second marriage to the current Administration: the money trail. Blackwater has spent heavily this year on lobbyists—particularly Democratic ones. In the first quarter of 2010, the company spent more than $500,000 for the services of Stuart Eizenstat, a well-connected Democratic lobbyist who served in the Clinton and Carter administrations. Eizenstat heads the international practice for the powerhouse law and lobbying firm Covington and Burling.

https://www.thenation.com/article/blackwaters-new-sugar-daddy-obama-administration/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A model among thousands of models in NYC. Know the name of any other models in NYC, unless they are married to rich men/actors?

Nobody knew her name until she married Trump.

Coco Rocha, Carolyn Murphy, Hillary Rhoda, Karlie Kloss, Ashley Graham....

I don’t know a single one. Sorry.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:7:46- do you know her? Doubt it. You’re projecting a personality type on her. She looks reserved because of the pout. She looks reserved because she’s miserable. She looks reserved because she hates her husband. She wants to be back in NYC with no responsibilities except raising a son and looking the part of a trophy wife.

No, I don't know her. I don't know Michelle Obama or Laura Bush or Hillary Clinton either. Melania Trump does not exude warmth. The others do to a much greater degree.

I think many of the people, and children, whom she has been around would disagree with you.

PP here. I agree with you when she's around children, and I'm not saying she's not a kind and caring person. I think she is. I'm trying to say that she also presents with a shy reserve that (IMHO) would not be consistent with having facial plastic surgery that would generate a lot of public scrutiny. For whatever reason, she does not exude warmth to the public.

I think she's extremely shy.
-DP

As an extremely shy person i agree. I can spot someone from my own tribe.

hahahhahahaha. did you also pose nude, oh extremely shy person?