The Twitter Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Looks like a civil discussion to me?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Looks like a civil discussion to me?

He unfollowed her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Looks like a civil discussion to me?

Assigning selfish motives to someone without evidence is not “civil”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Is she going to use her access to twitters internal systems to get the scoop on musks free speech suppression?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Looks like a civil discussion to me?

He unfollowed her.

That’s civil

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Is she going to use her access to twitters internal systems to get the scoop on musks free speech suppression?

As pointed out many times over the last few years, Twitter is a private company, free speech does not apply. Funny how people care so much now…

[Anonymous]

With apologies to Johnnie Cochran (RIP)

If it’s state action in disguise,
The Constitution applies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Looks like a civil discussion to me?

He unfollowed her.

That’s civil

Petty AF

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:With apologies to Johnnie Cochran (RIP)

If it’s state action in disguise,
The Constitution applies

Release #6 and it STILL isn't quite what the RWNJs are claiming, of some wide-spread FBI-run effort for the sole purpose muzzling conservatives.

Nothing in the releases currently supports that, no matter what the usual vacuous RWNJ loudmouth idiots like Tom Fitton, Dinesh D'Souza and a couple thousand fake "patriot" bot accounts with an American flag in their twitter profile want to claim.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Is she going to use her access to twitters internal systems to get the scoop on musks free speech suppression?

As pointed out many times over the last few years, Twitter is a private company, free speech does not apply. Funny how people care so much now…

What's funny is that you used to care, but now don't. It's not like we ever thought your position was principled, but at least you have made it clear that it's not.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uh oh Bari gonna get in trouble

Well, that didn’t last long.

Is she going to use her access to twitters internal systems to get the scoop on musks free speech suppression?

As pointed out many times over the last few years, Twitter is a private company, free speech does not apply. Funny how people care so much now…

What's funny is that you used to care, but now don't. It's not like we ever thought your position was principled, but at least you have made it clear that it's not.

That’s the first time I posted about it so you have no clue wether I “used to care” or not. I just think it’s funny that now “free speech” is getting used as much as it is. If Twitter was a private company last year so free speech didn’t matter, why the change now?

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Why is anyone even still talking about "free speech?"

Elon has made it clear he no longer (and perhaps never did) care about free speech. It was always about him trying to ban people he didn't like.

He's as much as admitted it.

https://twitter.com/honestsportz/status/1604240137575170050

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is anyone even still talking about "free speech?"

Elon has made it clear he no longer (and perhaps never did) care about free speech. It was always about him trying to ban people he didn't like.

He's as much as admitted it.

https://twitter.com/honestsportz/status/1604240137575170050

Because as shown in your posts, the same people that were spouting "twitter is a private company" when conservatives were banned are now criticizing the same private company for banning people.