| Defense is going for confirmation bias as reasonable doubt. Essentially saying the evidence leads to agreed hook up, rather than catfish theory. |
| Another good closing by Prosecution - BB had to testify in to get Christine's "affairs and fetishes" into evidence, because there is no actual evidence of either. |
| One thing I can’t get out of my head is how BB brought up 3 or 4 times how his fingers went through the wounds…like he was getting off on it. Just disgusting |
All while testimony and interviews from him and JMP state that Christine was speaking. Impossible if those wounds were from Joe. |
I miss my friend Joe
|
| he still speaking saying nothing |
I know the jury is zoed out af. |
| *zoned |
at least he's not tripping over his words today. He's better at closing than questioning |
Well he did say Brendan got on the stand and “told a story.” Not the best choice of words for defense closing imo but very accurate. |
| This dude just loves to babble doesn't he |
How did she do? Did she make most of the points we have discussed here and were in yesterday's texts about how implausible his whole story is? |
|
Defense's closing is more focused on impugning Juliana than proving Brendan's innocence. Even without her testimony, there's still enough here that points to Brendan:
1. The blood evidence 2. The lie about having a meeting that day 3. The windows |
I wish she'd emphasized that his whole tale about having an important work meeting on Feb 24 was a big fat lie. I didn't hear her mention that - did I miss it? |
|
That stack of paper is so thick. I’m in danger of dozing off.
Juliana this Juliana that. It’s the BLOOD |