APS - School Shifts in the Fall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.

I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.

I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.

Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?

I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.

I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.

No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.

My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.

Do you not know how to do a search on Twitter? Search for Miranda Turner's handle and the apeshit post would come up, or at least it did before it was locked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.

I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.

I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.

Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?

I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.

I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.

No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.

My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.

That’s the short list - along with anyone else who those people shared it with...

If BE shared it with someone without any understanding that it would go on Twitter, that person is truly an asshole for letting BE take the fall. AEM may have moved on, but people in the neighborhood (which is his neighborhood too) have not.

Well if this is what you talk about in your neighborhood, then you need to move on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.

I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.

I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.

Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?

I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.

I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.

No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.

My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.

That’s the short list - along with anyone else who those people shared it with...

If BE shared it with someone without any understanding that it would go on Twitter, that person is truly an asshole for letting BE take the fall. AEM may have moved on, but people in the neighborhood (which is his neighborhood too) have not.

Well if this is what you talk about in your neighborhood, then you need to move on.

For real. Their block parties must be ragers.

[Anonymous]

The Turner campaign's/APE's (is there a difference?) little campaign to FOIA Kadera's emails has been exposed and seems to have backfired on them.

That's why they are having a temper tantrum on DCUM now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Turner campaign's/APE's (is there a difference?) little campaign to FOIA Kadera's emails has been exposed and seems to have backfired on them.

That's why they are having a temper tantrum on DCUM now.

Probably the very same people who melted down at the School Board meeting this week. That was disturbing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

Do you go around liking their tweets too? Because certain SR members liked a lot of apeshit’s tweets.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

Do you go around liking their tweets too? Because certain SR members liked a lot of apeshit’s tweets.

JFC, you want to castigate someone because they liked some tweets that you find offensive? My
God. If only you harnessed this energy into something good and productive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

The significance of having so few followers that are all SR is that you don’t just stroll upon a Twitter account. So when the account first opened you look to see who likes/follows it first. You don’t just happen upon a Twitter account the first day it starts tweeting. That come home with all the screen shots it’s clear this person is entwined w smart restart. But even if you accept that all of SR just happen to start following right when the troll account was created and it’s not them, they still love/like and retweet the troll Twitter account. It’s really gross slander too. I follow people I don’t like/ agree with but I’m not retweeting and liking them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

Do you go around liking their tweets too? Because certain SR members liked a lot of apeshit’s tweets.

JFC, you want to castigate someone because they liked some tweets that you find offensive? My
God. If only you harnessed this energy into something good and productive.

Seriously. THIS is what concerns you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

Do you go around liking their tweets too? Because certain SR members liked a lot of apeshit’s tweets.

JFC, you want to castigate someone because they liked some tweets that you find offensive? My
God. If only you harnessed this energy into something good and productive.

LOL, you’re not exactly saving the world here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.

I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.

I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.

Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?

I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.

I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.

No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.

My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.

Do you not know how to do a search on Twitter? Search for Miranda Turner's handle and the apeshit post would come up, or at least it did before it was locked.

Or if APEsh1t followed one of them they’d be notified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.

I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.

I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.

Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?

I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.

I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.

No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.

My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.

Do you not know how to do a search on Twitter? Search for Miranda Turner's handle and the apeshit post would come up, or at least it did before it was locked.

Or if APEsh1t followed one of them they’d be notified.

Apes**t followed three twitter "people" as of the last time it was live. None of them were BE. I have the Twitter screenshots and will start naming names if this back and forth continues. The only reason why I haven't posted them yet is that I can't figure out how to do it here, and don't actually have time to create a webpage or a social media account to post. I do have a real job besides eating popcorn on DCUM.

We can go through this again if you'd like.

Not in dispute

- Husband of APE supporter FOIA'ed MK's emails
- BE (husband of SR admin and prolific SR poster) FOIAed the FOIA
- Instead of releasing it himself, he found a sketchy Twitter account only followed by SR supporters and other SR-type groups regionally and posted it to AEM. (Only 12 followers, 3 following) Deader than a doornail. This thread would be dead too if BE didn't post it. Want to blame this thread on anyone? Blame BE.
- In addition to the Foia the foia, Twitter account primarily posted screenshots from APE that only to make MT look bad, and tagging all of the board members. Very pro-MK.
- BE tried to backtrack hard when it did not go his way
- After s**t got real, MK had to make a statement saying that she doesn't work with any groups, or has any anon social media accounts

Speculation

- Whether MT is working with original FOIA guy. I don't care. Everything was legal. There's probably nothing there though.
- Whether MK knew about it. I don't think she did. It's too juvenile and beneath any grown a$$ adult. My 18 month old is more mature than whoever created this account.
- Whether there were 2 FOIA the FOIAs or just one. (Although original FOIA person was told by APS that there was only one, according to an anon post on AEM.)


Now SR is trying to save whatever reputation is left, so they're posting ad nauseam on DCUM this same tired arguments. And around we go.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.

I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.

I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.

Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?

I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.

I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.

No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.

My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.

Do you not know how to do a search on Twitter? Search for Miranda Turner's handle and the apeshit post would come up, or at least it did before it was locked.

Or if APEsh1t followed one of them they’d be notified.

Apes**t followed three twitter "people" as of the last time it was live. None of them were BE. I have the Twitter screenshots and will start naming names if this back and forth continues. The only reason why I haven't posted them yet is that I can't figure out how to do it here, and don't actually have time to create a webpage or a social media account to post. I do have a real job besides eating popcorn on DCUM.

We can go through this again if you'd like.

Not in dispute

- Husband of APE supporter FOIA'ed MK's emails
- BE (husband of SR admin and prolific SR poster) FOIAed the FOIA
- Instead of releasing it himself, he found a sketchy Twitter account only followed by SR supporters and other SR-type groups regionally and posted it to AEM. (Only 12 followers, 3 following) Deader than a doornail. This thread would be dead too if BE didn't post it. Want to blame this thread on anyone? Blame BE.
- In addition to the Foia the foia, Twitter account primarily posted screenshots from APE that only to make MT look bad, and tagging all of the board members. Very pro-MK.
- BE tried to backtrack hard when it did not go his way
- After s**t got real, MK had to make a statement saying that she doesn't work with any groups, or has any anon social media accounts

Speculation

- Whether MT is working with original FOIA guy. I don't care. Everything was legal. There's probably nothing there though.
- Whether MK knew about it. I don't think she did. It's too juvenile and beneath any grown a$$ adult. My 18 month old is more mature than whoever created this account.
- Whether there were 2 FOIA the FOIAs or just one. (Although original FOIA person was told by APS that there was only one, according to an anon post on AEM.)
Now SR is trying to save whatever reputation is left, so they're posting ad nauseam on DCUM this same tired arguments. And around we go.

Speculation:
Who created Twitter account & posted screenshots?
How did Twitter account get screenshots?

Which brings us back to...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.

It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.

Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

This Twitter is now locked, although someone has screenshotted it and now I’ve seen them too. What’s more fascinating are the followers of this account. All sr activists. It’s a troll account made to make APE look bad out of context and MK look like the better candidate.

MK is going to lose if SR keeps amping up the drama to 11.

Weird that you assume agreement from following. I follow a lot of people I disagree with on Twitter. It's very common.

The significance of having so few followers that are all SR is that you don’t just stroll upon a Twitter account. So when the account first opened you look to see who likes/follows it first. You don’t just happen upon a Twitter account the first day it starts tweeting. That come home with all the screen shots it’s clear this person is entwined w smart restart. But even if you accept that all of SR just happen to start following right when the troll account was created and it’s not them, they still love/like and retweet the troll Twitter account. It’s really gross slander too. I follow people I don’t like/ agree with but I’m not retweeting and liking them.

How is slander? I get that there were screenshots, but those are the people’s own words. I saw the account before it got locked and I don’t understand the uproar. There were a few retweets from other accounts that were critical of APE/MT and a few screenshots of conversations. So there’s a mole in APE who is either directly or indirectly behind that account. You think it’s kind of sleazy? Fine. But don’t we all have more important issues than this?