APS - School Shifts in the Fall?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?


I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.


I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.


No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


PP here, I have no doubt that SR folks post here. I think the boards are full of APE and SR posters. I’m not a member of either SR or APE and I’m just not feeling the uproar about the Twitter account of whether one sprung up against SR. Just bigger fish to fry I guess, but YMMV.


I think the Twitter account wouldn’t have been such a big deal if a SR member hadn’t made the legal but ethically-dubious decision to FOIA the original request for MK’s emails, post it to the anonymous Twitter account to encourage doxxing, promote those tweets on AEM, and then lie about it when caught.


He didn’t post it


Your proof being?


You posted it. Prove that you didn’t.

I posted what? My belief that BE (or his wife) owns the Twitter account? Why would I try to prove I didn’t post something that I freely admit I did?


You created the Twitter account and posted the screenshots.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?


I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.


I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.


No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.
Anonymous
Look, I don’t think MK was involved either. But that Twitter account, once you scrolled past the FOIA of the FOIA, spent a lot of time putting down MT through childish screenshots from APE’s Facebook page while promoting MK. MK actually had to make a statement disavowing herself of any of this pettiness.

I know SR would rather eat their foot than see MT elected, but they should learn a thing or two about strategy. Don’t make the candidate that you favor look bad, umkay?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


PP here, I have no doubt that SR folks post here. I think the boards are full of APE and SR posters. I’m not a member of either SR or APE and I’m just not feeling the uproar about the Twitter account of whether one sprung up against SR. Just bigger fish to fry I guess, but YMMV.


I think the Twitter account wouldn’t have been such a big deal if a SR member hadn’t made the legal but ethically-dubious decision to FOIA the original request for MK’s emails, post it to the anonymous Twitter account to encourage doxxing, promote those tweets on AEM, and then lie about it when caught.


He didn’t post it


Your proof being?


You posted it. Prove that you didn’t.

I posted what? My belief that BE (or his wife) owns the Twitter account? Why would I try to prove I didn’t post something that I freely admit I did?


You created the Twitter account and posted the screenshots.

This has gone truly gotten unhinged. You don’t even know who I am to make any kind of accusation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


PP here, I have no doubt that SR folks post here. I think the boards are full of APE and SR posters. I’m not a member of either SR or APE and I’m just not feeling the uproar about the Twitter account of whether one sprung up against SR. Just bigger fish to fry I guess, but YMMV.


I think the Twitter account wouldn’t have been such a big deal if a SR member hadn’t made the legal but ethically-dubious decision to FOIA the original request for MK’s emails, post it to the anonymous Twitter account to encourage doxxing, promote those tweets on AEM, and then lie about it when caught.


He didn’t post it


Your proof being?


You posted it. Prove that you didn’t.

I posted what? My belief that BE (or his wife) owns the Twitter account? Why would I try to prove I didn’t post something that I freely admit I did?


You created the Twitter account and posted the screenshots.

DP. What is this even supposed to mean?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


PP here, I have no doubt that SR folks post here. I think the boards are full of APE and SR posters. I’m not a member of either SR or APE and I’m just not feeling the uproar about the Twitter account of whether one sprung up against SR. Just bigger fish to fry I guess, but YMMV.


I think the Twitter account wouldn’t have been such a big deal if a SR member hadn’t made the legal but ethically-dubious decision to FOIA the original request for MK’s emails, post it to the anonymous Twitter account to encourage doxxing, promote those tweets on AEM, and then lie about it when caught.


He didn’t post it


Your proof being?


You posted it. Prove that you didn’t.

I posted what? My belief that BE (or his wife) owns the Twitter account? Why would I try to prove I didn’t post something that I freely admit I did?


You created the Twitter account and posted the screenshots.

This has gone truly gotten unhinged. You don’t even know who I am to make any kind of accusation.


Obviously, I’m just making an unsubstantiated claim. Just like pp.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Look, I don’t think MK was involved either. But that Twitter account, once you scrolled past the FOIA of the FOIA, spent a lot of time putting down MT through childish screenshots from APE’s Facebook page while promoting MK. MK actually had to make a statement disavowing herself of any of this pettiness.

I know SR would rather eat their foot than see MT elected, but they should learn a thing or two about strategy. Don’t make the candidate that you favor look bad, umkay?


That doesn’t make MK look bad since she wasn’t involved.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


PP here, I have no doubt that SR folks post here. I think the boards are full of APE and SR posters. I’m not a member of either SR or APE and I’m just not feeling the uproar about the Twitter account of whether one sprung up against SR. Just bigger fish to fry I guess, but YMMV.


I think the Twitter account wouldn’t have been such a big deal if a SR member hadn’t made the legal but ethically-dubious decision to FOIA the original request for MK’s emails, post it to the anonymous Twitter account to encourage doxxing, promote those tweets on AEM, and then lie about it when caught.


He didn’t post it


Your proof being?


You posted it. Prove that you didn’t.

I posted what? My belief that BE (or his wife) owns the Twitter account? Why would I try to prove I didn’t post something that I freely admit I did?


You created the Twitter account and posted the screenshots.

This has gone truly gotten unhinged. You don’t even know who I am to make any kind of accusation.


Obviously, I’m just making an unsubstantiated claim. Just like pp.

DP. There is actual evidence to suggest BE is affiliated with the account. I realize that’s inconvenient for your preferred narrative so you want to pretend it doesn’t exist, but that doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t see the emperor had no clothes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?


I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.


I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.


No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.


My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


PP here, I have no doubt that SR folks post here. I think the boards are full of APE and SR posters. I’m not a member of either SR or APE and I’m just not feeling the uproar about the Twitter account of whether one sprung up against SR. Just bigger fish to fry I guess, but YMMV.


I think the Twitter account wouldn’t have been such a big deal if a SR member hadn’t made the legal but ethically-dubious decision to FOIA the original request for MK’s emails, post it to the anonymous Twitter account to encourage doxxing, promote those tweets on AEM, and then lie about it when caught.


He didn’t post it


Your proof being?


You posted it. Prove that you didn’t.

I posted what? My belief that BE (or his wife) owns the Twitter account? Why would I try to prove I didn’t post something that I freely admit I did?


You created the Twitter account and posted the screenshots.

This has gone truly gotten unhinged. You don’t even know who I am to make any kind of accusation.


Obviously, I’m just making an unsubstantiated claim. Just like pp.

DP. There is actual evidence to suggest BE is affiliated with the account. I realize that’s inconvenient for your preferred narrative so you want to pretend it doesn’t exist, but that doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t see the emperor had no clothes.


“Affiliated” as in he knew it existed and posted a link to it. That’s all you got.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?


I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.


I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.


No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.


My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Both APE and SR claim to speak for a wide range of Arlington parents. Their steering committees have both claimed to have met individually with APS and state leaders to further their goals. Most, if not all of us commenting here will never have that kind of access.

I agree with the poster above that’s it is a zero sum game, and we are all caught in the middle. I don’t want either of these groups speaking on behalf of me.

I hope they become irrelevant in the Fall.


They are basically already irrelevant now.

They are just very loud right now because APE wants to elect MT and SR doesn’t want that.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?


I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.


I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.


No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.


My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.


That’s the short list - along with anyone else who those people shared it with...
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What’s this nonsense about a recall? I recently joined APE and see nothing about it other than a few stray comments now and then. But bigger question is why do people act like a recall is so offensive? Or a FOIA for that matter? Why are these all sensitive topics? And I agree with PP that the Twitter troll stuff is much more concerning and we all saw who is following and promoting those accounts.


It’s a bunch of made-up drama by SR. They like their alternative facts.


Don't see how it's made up when there is a screenshot of APE member EHN posting to OpenFCPS saying "Arlington Parents for Education is considering a recall effort" can you help, etc.

Plus there are screenshots from within their APE group of them planning the recall efforts.

I'm not condoning putting screenshots out there in general. But they are out there. And they sure are eye-opening.

https://twitter.com/ap_eshit

LOL, that account has been private for days. If you can still see it, then you’re one of its SR followers.


I know I’m in the super minority here, but it doesn’t bother me that APE’s screenshots were shared. It wouldn’t bother me if SR’s screenshots were shared, which probably also have their share of embarrassing things. Nothing is ever truly private on the internet and it’s not like they revealed state secrets. I’m more concerned about the substance of some of those communications, not the manner in which they were made public. If any follower used their real identity to follow the account, I can’t imagine they’d care that those screenshots of those likes or follows would bother them. At least they shouldn’t.


I was laughing more because posters (here and elsewhere) swear that no one from SR ever reads, let alone posts on, DCUM. But then they do stuff like this and it’s obvious that they do.


Obvious who does what?

I’m not part of APE or SR. I do read AEM, but never post. I’m happy to call out everyone who acts like a jerk though.

There are tons of us out there who aren’t part of either group - you really think all APS parents fall into one or the other?

So you’ve called out the owner of the Twitter account for doxing JB, right?


I’ve said it’s a sh1tty thing to do, yes.

As is intentionally conflating SR and MK.

Which I didn’t do, but that was a cute little “both sides” move. You’re not as neutral as you claim to be.


I can think multiple people from all different positions are sh1tty. There is no scarcity of a-holes in our county.

Sure, and we can address each of the, in their own right. Conflating MK and SR really has nothing to do with trying to dox a completely different person on Twitter, and yet you seem to think it provided some kind of defense to the would-be doxxer.


No, I don’t think that. You seem to have a lot of trouble following.

Bottom line is don’t lie:
- don’t claim BE created that account
- don’t claim MK is part of SR

I never claimed MK is part of SR. As for BE owning that account, there is corroborating evidence that he either created it, or knows who did and fed hem the information to post there. If you have evidence to refute that, please share.


My “evidence” is the account is private and you have no f-ing clue clue who created it. Obviously, someone who supports SR and hates APE. But that’s all you know.

It may not even be someone they know. Could be.....jerk Twitter person creates account. Starts “following” SR people. SR people noticed new followers and go check it out.

You can say SR was sh1tty to SHARE it but not that they CREATED it. Because you have zero evidence and it’s plausible that there are multiple people who dislike APE/support SR.

DP. The Twitter account posted the results of a FOIA request for JB's original request. A separate FOIA request disclosed that there had been only one FOIA request for the original request, and that request was made by BE. So the only ones who had that FOIA request results were BE and anyone he personally shared them with. Shortly after the FOIA results were posted to the Twitter account, BE posted a link to those tweets on AEM, claiming he just happened to come across this random account while casually browsing Twitter, a dubious claim given the very small number of followers the account had. Shortly after BE is outed on AEM as the person who requested JB's original FOIA request, the Twitter account is made private.

There would have to be a whole bunch of significant coincidences for BE to have nothing to with the Twitter account.


That’s the short list - along with anyone else who those people shared it with...

If BE shared it with someone without any understanding that it would go on Twitter, that person is truly an asshole for letting BE take the fall. AEM may have moved on, but people in the neighborhood (which is his neighborhood too) have not.
Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Go to: