Superbowl halftime - scantily dressed women and very covered up men

[Anonymous]

These parents who have tween and teens who are getting freaked out probably and most likely see much worse than that in their school or behind the bleachers.


We live in an era of iPhones where it takes 5 seconds to find raunchy stuff to look at.

Yet these geezers are mad about a show that would’ve been “outrageous” back in 1989.

It goes to show how out of touch society is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A sports event is not an adult only event. Who are you people who have never heard of taking kids to a football game? It is a public sports event. By nature it is a family event - it is a public sports game. Almost ever stadium even has family sections. I am sure there were thousands of kids at the game.

This wasn't at a strip club. This was on a public stage at a sports venue - it was a football game.

Have you actually been to an NFL game? Sorry but which part did your kids enjoy? The tailgating with the drunks in the parking lot? The drunks then moving into the stadium to continue drinking? The belligerent drunk fans? The fans fighting? Bc I’ve been to several NFL games and have seen this each and every time.

But it’s part of ‘Mercia and good old family values to revere football. How dare you point out the truth!

[Anonymous]

If that’s simulating sex then I’ve been doing it wrong for 20 years!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If that’s simulating sex then I’ve been doing it wrong for 20 years!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A sports event is not an adult only event. Who are you people who have never heard of taking kids to a football game? It is a public sports event. By nature it is a family event - it is a public sports game. Almost ever stadium even has family sections. I am sure there were thousands of kids at the game.

This wasn't at a strip club. This was on a public stage at a sports venue - it was a football game.

9/10 kids - especially any kid who doesn’t actually play football, which according to DCUM is a heathenly sport for the lower class - could care less about watching a game on TV for 3+ hours, especially if it is not their team. Please stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4645572002

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A sports event is not an adult only event. Who are you people who have never heard of taking kids to a football game? It is a public sports event. By nature it is a family event - it is a public sports game. Almost ever stadium even has family sections. I am sure there were thousands of kids at the game.

This wasn't at a strip club. This was on a public stage at a sports venue - it was a football game.

9/10 kids - especially any kid who doesn’t actually play football, which according to DCUM is a heathenly sport for the lower class - could care less about watching a game on TV for 3+ hours, especially if it is not their team. Please stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4645572002

Am I supposed to care what a random link to USA Today says?

[Anonymous]

Can anyone that thinks last night's performance was empowering for women help me understand why?

Miss America banned the swimsuit competition 2 years ago because apparently swimsuits do not empower females yet women wearing bodysuits gyrating and pole dancing on a different stage is fabulous. What message exactly are we sending to our daughters? Is it wonderful to objectify women's bodies or is it not? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/05/business/miss-america-swimsuit.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A sports event is not an adult only event. Who are you people who have never heard of taking kids to a football game? It is a public sports event. By nature it is a family event - it is a public sports game. Almost ever stadium even has family sections. I am sure there were thousands of kids at the game.

This wasn't at a strip club. This was on a public stage at a sports venue - it was a football game.

9/10 kids - especially any kid who doesn’t actually play football, which according to DCUM is a heathenly sport for the lower class - could care less about watching a game on TV for 3+ hours, especially if it is not their team. Please stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4645572002

Am I supposed to care what a random link to USA Today says?

Just that he acknowledges that many kids watch the Super Bowl, despite some here trying to claim football isn’t for kids to watch. Which is a hilarious assertion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These parents who have tween and teens who are getting freaked out probably and most likely see much worse than that in their school or behind the bleachers.


We live in an era of iPhones where it takes 5 seconds to find raunchy stuff to look at.

Yet these geezers are mad about a show that would’ve been “outrageous” back in 1989.

It goes to show how out of touch society is.

Sorry, but good parenting involves shielding your kids from this crap for as long as possible. Kids are very impressionable at young ages. My 12 year old just got her phone a few months ago. She doesn't have access to youtube, safari, or any social media apps. The media is very controlled. When I am ready for her to be exposed to more, I will. That superbowl show took us totally off guard. Not what I was hoping for her to be watching at such a young and innocent age.

Yes, there are 12 year olds who are already on social media and doing all sorts of crap. I don't care. My kid is still a kid. And the NFL failed us with this show.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A sports event is not an adult only event. Who are you people who have never heard of taking kids to a football game? It is a public sports event. By nature it is a family event - it is a public sports game. Almost ever stadium even has family sections. I am sure there were thousands of kids at the game.

This wasn't at a strip club. This was on a public stage at a sports venue - it was a football game.

9/10 kids - especially any kid who doesn’t actually play football, which according to DCUM is a heathenly sport for the lower class - could care less about watching a game on TV for 3+ hours, especially if it is not their team. Please stop. You’re embarrassing yourself.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/4645572002

Am I supposed to care what a random link to USA Today says?

The poster is cool with a 1 year old watching TV.

[Anonymous]

My son is 13 and just remarked this morning that this was the first Super Bowl he actually watched in it’s entirety.

In past years, he’s watched intermittently, switching off between the game and playing with his friends in the basement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These parents who have tween and teens who are getting freaked out probably and most likely see much worse than that in their school or behind the bleachers.


We live in an era of iPhones where it takes 5 seconds to find raunchy stuff to look at.

Yet these geezers are mad about a show that would’ve been “outrageous” back in 1989.

It goes to show how out of touch society is.

Sorry, but good parenting involves shielding your kids from this crap for as long as possible. Kids are very impressionable at young ages. My 12 year old just got her phone a few months ago. She doesn't have access to youtube, safari, or any social media apps. The media is very controlled. When I am ready for her to be exposed to more, I will. That superbowl show took us totally off guard. Not what I was hoping for her to be watching at such a young and innocent age.

Yes, there are 12 year olds who are already on social media and doing all sorts of crap. I don't care. My kid is still a kid. And the NFL failed us with this show.

You are the one failing her.

She watches her friends phones, btw. You have not shielded her. You’ve just taught her to Do it behind your back.

[Anonymous]

Poor kid is sleep deprived with black bags under his eyes!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Can anyone that thinks last night's performance was empowering for women help me understand why?

Miss America banned the swimsuit competition 2 years ago because apparently swimsuits do not empower females yet women wearing bodysuits gyrating and pole dancing on a different stage is fabulous. What message exactly are we sending to our daughters? Is it wonderful to objectify women's bodies or is it not? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/05/business/miss-america-swimsuit.html

You don’t understand the difference between being forced to wear something to have your body judged and choosing to wear a leotard and costumes to dance in.

Btw don’t turn on Am. Got talent.

She is dancing on a trapeze and you can see her crotch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These parents who have tween and teens who are getting freaked out probably and most likely see much worse than that in their school or behind the bleachers.


We live in an era of iPhones where it takes 5 seconds to find raunchy stuff to look at.

Yet these geezers are mad about a show that would’ve been “outrageous” back in 1989.

It goes to show how out of touch society is.

Sorry, but good parenting involves shielding your kids from this crap for as long as possible. Kids are very impressionable at young ages. My 12 year old just got her phone a few months ago. She doesn't have access to youtube, safari, or any social media apps. The media is very controlled. When I am ready for her to be exposed to more, I will. That superbowl show took us totally off guard. Not what I was hoping for her to be watching at such a young and innocent age.

Yes, there are 12 year olds who are already on social media and doing all sorts of crap. I don't care. My kid is still a kid. And the NFL failed us with this show.

Way to take ZERO responsibility for being a parent. What were you expecting from Shakira and J Lo? Turtlenecks and a cover of “My Heart Will Go On”?