The Mueller Report

[Anonymous]

None is so blind as those who will not see.

[Anonymous]

It is clear the GOP lie machine work on the weak-minded, just like they like it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enough. The coup was Trump working with the Russians (as Rudy discussed at length yesterday) to steal the election.

Wrong.

The coup was the spying on then candidate Trump then using the fake dossier to launch the Mueller investigation in an orchestrated attempt to have him removed from office.

There was no Russian collusion so now Barr can start to investigate the real treason by the Obama administration.

You are clueless that the country isn’t behind the so called coup. Get out of your Faux news trap. A big majority of Americans aren’t with Trump. And a good number of cult 45 has gotten wiser and has deserted him. His approval has never crossed 45% and now is on its way down after Mueller report.

You can live in your delusions but America isn’t with the conman. The more he tries to stage a fake coup lie the more he is gonna lose support of independents. He started with negative 3 million and has dug a big hole since then. You do know he can’t win with just the fraud party voters , right?

The former Obama administration is going to be facing an investigation into the origins of their attempted coup to unseat an elected President.

Simply, you cannot falsify evidence as the basis for obtaining warrants to spy on political opponents nor use that false evidence as the basis for investigating someone in an attempt to impeach them.

We are still a nation of laws, not feelings- so this level of treason will need to be fully investigated.

Yes we are a nation of alws WHEN IT COMES TO APPLYING IT ON OTHER PARTY according to the Cult 45 members. But when it comes to accepting the Report's obstruction of charges or innumerable lies about lying about Russia, Manafort providing internal poll data to Russian spy kilimnik or Stone working with wikileaks, then it is all golden. After all the liar in chief said he believes putin over Americans. Would you say the same thing had it been Obama or Hillary who did all the things the Liar in chief has said and done? Your hypocrisy shows you guys don't care about country. Let America be damned as long as Democrats are defeated.

[Anonymous]

Ex-Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste criticizes Barr's handling of Mueller report

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/440254-ex-watergate-prosecutor-richard-ben-veniste-criticizes-barrs-handling-of

[Anonymous]

Belatedly, the White House is trying to shut Don McGahn up to keep him from spilling the beans on Trump to Congress.
http://www.rollcall.com/news/whitehouse/will-white-house-trumps-lawyers-block-don-mcgahn-testifying
Will the White House or Trump’s lawyers block Don McGahn from testifying?
President’s team is examining case law for possible claim of executive privilege or immunity

[Anonymous]

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/23/mueller-report-trump-denials-1287870

President Donald Trump wants New York Times journalists to beg for forgiveness on their knees, and White House aides say they’re ready to accept apologies from the press corps at large.

They’re in for a long wait.


Special counsel Robert Mueller’s bombshell 448-page report has unleashed a very different kind of reckoning among Washington reporters and media watchdogs.

The report detailed multiple efforts by Trump and his senior aides to mislead journalists and the public, reigniting a long-running media debate about how to cover such an unprecedented presidency — and when, if ever, to accept White House denials at face value.

The repeated public rejections of key aspects of the report in the face of sworn, on-the-record statements from his own advisers have diminished the power of a denial from the president of the United States — something that once carried weight.

“Reporters have to start assuming that this White House is going to continue to lie and manipulate the media,” Columbia Journalism Review editor-in-chief Kyle Pope said in an interview. Pope, who said some news organizations were too slow to challenge official White House statements, added: “The dealings with the White House have to be reframed given what we now know about them.”

[Anonymous]

Reporters have to start assuming that this White House is going to continue to lie and manipulate the media,” Columbia Journalism Review editor-in-chief Kyle Pope said in an interview.

About goddamn time.

[Anonymous]

He's nuts. Trump refused to speak with Mueller. And I bet he wouldn't allow Ivanka and Donnie Jr. near him either. But Hope Hicks spoke. And Don McGahn and Kelly.

President Trump on Monday questioned why Robert Mueller and his team did not speak with “the people who were closest” to him and his campaign, even though Mueller interviewed several former aides and the president did not agree to sit with the special counsel.

“Isn’t it amazing that the people who were closest to me, by far, and knew the Campaign better than anyone, were never even called to testify before Mueller,” Trump tweeted. “The reason is that the 18 Angry Democrats knew they would all say ‘NO COLLUSION’ and only very good things!”

[Anonymous]

Another witness to obstruction called to testify before Congress.

House Democrats have zeroed in on former White House counsel Don McGahn — a witness whose testimony could antagonize President Trump — as they adopt an aggressive posture in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report.

The House Judiciary Committee has demanded that McGahn appear in a public hearing before it on May 21, which would give Democrats an opportunity to draw out unflattering details about Trump and his White House.

McGahn is viewed as a key witness who could shed light on obstruction of justice allegations against Trump. Mueller did not find Trump obstructed justice, but he also did not exonerate him on the issue.

The former White House counsel offered extensive testimony to Mueller’s team and is featured prominently in the report’s examination of nearly a dozen episodes of potential obstruction of justice by Trump, including one instance in which Trump is described as directing McGahn to have the special counsel removed.

[Anonymous]

Sad state of affairs.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/america-fine-collusion/587701/

Rudy Giuliani couldn’t have crystallized the stakes more clearly.

“There’s nothing wrong with taking information from Russians,” President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer said on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, discussing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

A quick survey of the American political scene indicates that much of the nation agrees. Nearly three years after the first reports of Russian hacking into Democratic National Committee computers, there’s been little effort to take action that would contradict Giuliani’s judgment. Individuals may disagree, but Congress has made little effort to deter Americans from coordinating with foreign actors. Not only has there been no 9/11 Commission–style attempt to understand what happened in 2016; there’s been no serious federal initiative to harden vulnerable election infrastructure, even after Russia once again meddled in the 2018 elections. By deciding not to act, the American government has effectively decided that foreign interference is acceptable.

[Anonymous]

These are not the actions of a man who was exonerated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sad state of affairs.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/america-fine-collusion/587701/

Rudy Giuliani couldn’t have crystallized the stakes more clearly.

“There’s nothing wrong with taking information from Russians,” President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer said on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, discussing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

A quick survey of the American political scene indicates that much of the nation agrees. Nearly three years after the first reports of Russian hacking into Democratic National Committee computers, there’s been little effort to take action that would contradict Giuliani’s judgment. Individuals may disagree, but Congress has made little effort to deter Americans from coordinating with foreign actors. Not only has there been no 9/11 Commission–style attempt to understand what happened in 2016; there’s been no serious federal initiative to harden vulnerable election infrastructure, even after Russia once again meddled in the 2018 elections. By deciding not to act, the American government has effectively decided that foreign interference is acceptable.

Very sad.

[Anonymous]

Steel Dossier and Mueller Report side by side (understanding a lot of redactions and the entire counterintelligence investigation is still with the FBI)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/04/24/what-steele-dossier-said-vs-what-mueller-report-said

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sad state of affairs.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/america-fine-collusion/587701/

Rudy Giuliani couldn’t have crystallized the stakes more clearly.

“There’s nothing wrong with taking information from Russians,” President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer said on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, discussing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

A quick survey of the American political scene indicates that much of the nation agrees. Nearly three years after the first reports of Russian hacking into Democratic National Committee computers, there’s been little effort to take action that would contradict Giuliani’s judgment. Individuals may disagree, but Congress has made little effort to deter Americans from coordinating with foreign actors. Not only has there been no 9/11 Commission–style attempt to understand what happened in 2016; there’s been no serious federal initiative to harden vulnerable election infrastructure, even after Russia once again meddled in the 2018 elections. By deciding not to act, the American government has effectively decided that foreign interference is acceptable.

Amazing, the MSM is still pushing the lie that the Russians hacked the Democrat computers while trying to still tie in the collusion lie.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad state of affairs.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/america-fine-collusion/587701/

Rudy Giuliani couldn’t have crystallized the stakes more clearly.

“There’s nothing wrong with taking information from Russians,” President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer said on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday, discussing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

A quick survey of the American political scene indicates that much of the nation agrees. Nearly three years after the first reports of Russian hacking into Democratic National Committee computers, there’s been little effort to take action that would contradict Giuliani’s judgment. Individuals may disagree, but Congress has made little effort to deter Americans from coordinating with foreign actors. Not only has there been no 9/11 Commission–style attempt to understand what happened in 2016; there’s been no serious federal initiative to harden vulnerable election infrastructure, even after Russia once again meddled in the 2018 elections. By deciding not to act, the American government has effectively decided that foreign interference is acceptable.

Amazing, the MSM is still pushing the lie that the Russians hacked the Democrat computers while trying to still tie in the collusion lie.

You haven't read the Muller report yourself, have you?