Why is Blake Lively so overrated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.deuxmoi.world/latest/publicist-jennifer-abel-allegedly-breaks-silence-on-explosive-text-messages-in-baldoni-lawsuitist

Dummy. She doesn't need to be subpoenaed since these are work communications. They either subpoenaed the previous company or the company agreed to hand them over. Either way her permission is not needed. There is a message of her saying "I am having reckless thoughts about planting pieces over how're awful Blake is this week" so this "i would NEVER" is BS

I’m confused about when they subpoenaed the documents since the complaint was just filed this week?

You can subpoena to preserve evidence before a complaint is filed.

That’s different than forcing production. What was the mechanism to get the PR people’s emails and texts?

No it isn't. If a court signs a subpoena then they have to produce it.

You said preserve evidence that’s not the same as produce evidence.

I was also curious about this so I looked into it. Apparently the first step in a workplace sexual harassment case in CA is lodging a complaint against with the California Civil Rights Commission, which is has investigative (including subpoena) authority. The Commission then tries to get the parties to settle. If they can’t, then it goes on to a lawsuit.

The complaint is the commencement of the lawsuit. My understanding is that the subpoenaed communications are from the California Civil Rights Commission proceeding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

For the zillionth time, that’s not all she is alleging. She thinks the social medial comparing tanked her shampoo but people haven’t liked her for years and weren’t going to buy her shampoo anyway.

You're focusing on the least part of what she's alleging. Just skipping all the other stuff. Why is that?

1. That’s the part that seems to be in all headlines, the focus on the times article, and the press releases. (And yes I read the complaint).

2. It’s a huge part of damages and without that piece, it’s questionable whether she would have brought her case.

She has like 8 counts. Strange that you don’t focus on the other 7.

Because most people are too stupid to understand what's really going on. Like you.

You’re right - I don’t know what’s “really going on” or care much about it. As a lawyer, though, I am interested in seeing what’s a cognizable injury and how much you get paid for it. Blake (and her minions like you) will need to be interested in it too if she plans to win and have a payday.

Lawyers are a dime a dozen. Completely unimpressed, especially since you seem completely clueless as to what this is about.

So you have no substantive response, I see. Maybe AI can help you guys generate better responses.

Well you don't really care much about it yet you keep coming back for more. Bored today, Lady Lawyer? Still wondering what's going on?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

It's the retaliation that will do him in. She has receipts. Who is speaking out for him? Nobody and it's telling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

Is there a single person on this thread who's said she deserves to be sexually harassed? The title of this thread is literally "why is BL so overrated". People are responding to the thread title.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

Is there a single person on this thread who's said she deserves to be sexually harassed? The title of this thread is literally "why is BL so overrated". People are responding to the thread title.

You should probably read the rest of the thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

Is there a single person on this thread who's said she deserves to be sexually harassed? The title of this thread is literally "why is BL so overrated". People are responding to the thread title.

You should probably read the rest of the thread.

I did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

Is there a single person on this thread who's said she deserves to be sexually harassed? The title of this thread is literally "why is BL so overrated". People are responding to the thread title.

You should probably read the rest of the thread.

I did.

Your troll checks will start bouncing soon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.deuxmoi.world/latest/publicist-jennifer-abel-allegedly-breaks-silence-on-explosive-text-messages-in-baldoni-lawsuitist

Dummy. She doesn't need to be subpoenaed since these are work communications. They either subpoenaed the previous company or the company agreed to hand them over. Either way her permission is not needed. There is a message of her saying "I am having reckless thoughts about planting pieces over how're awful Blake is this week" so this "i would NEVER" is BS

I’m confused about when they subpoenaed the documents since the complaint was just filed this week?

You can subpoena to preserve evidence before a complaint is filed.

but they had the evidence already in the complaint. I’m unfamiliar with being able to subpoena something likely as contentious as personal texts before a complaint has even been filed? Surely the PR agency would have resisted discovery on grounds it was overbroad etc.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who don't understand the Blake dislike crack me up. This is a woman who got married on a plantation. That's like getting married at Auschwitz. Maybe she was sexually harassed, if it happened I hope it comes out in court and the guy faces consequences. But to me this is a woman who has shown time and again that she's a self involved ahole who is incapable of accountability.

+1. Wasn’t she also an alleged serial home-wrecker? She also can’t act. She’s also been shoved down our throats as this alleged fashionista “it” girl for like 15 years when she’s nothing special and has an insufferable, stupid, and smug personality. She’s a middle aged nepo baby D list actress married to the most annoying man in Hollywood, it’s really not surprising the masses instinctively don’t care for her.

She can wreck as many homes as she wants. Still doesn't deserve to be SH then dragged for speaking out

She made millions of dollars to “act” and the producer…said mean things to her? Sexually harassed is the NYPD creep in the news who was forcing working class women to give him oral sex if they want overtime hours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.deuxmoi.world/latest/publicist-jennifer-abel-allegedly-breaks-silence-on-explosive-text-messages-in-baldoni-lawsuitist

Dummy. She doesn't need to be subpoenaed since these are work communications. They either subpoenaed the previous company or the company agreed to hand them over. Either way her permission is not needed. There is a message of her saying "I am having reckless thoughts about planting pieces over how're awful Blake is this week" so this "i would NEVER" is BS

I’m confused about when they subpoenaed the documents since the complaint was just filed this week?

You can subpoena to preserve evidence before a complaint is filed.

That’s different than forcing production. What was the mechanism to get the PR people’s emails and texts?

No it isn't. If a court signs a subpoena then they have to produce it.

before the case is filed? In a fishing expedition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I don’t buy either side. If it was really so bad why didn’t she quit during filming? Why didn’t she call the cops? She’s filthy rich with a powerful husband and was raised by connected parents, this is not some desperate 19 year old from Kansas.

My questions too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting how the marketing plan was to focus on the reslience of the character and not on the domestic violence and to have Blake wear a flowered theme to reflect the character's work as a florist and then they used their own marketing plan against her to make her look shallow by not being serious and focused on the domestic violence themes.

This guy and the team he hired seem pretty sociopathic.

I also saw that the women who reposted the baby bump video where Blake made a comment was paid to repost it on a specific date by the crisis team Baldoni hired.

Right except my read on the timeline is that this marketing was failing before Baldoni started his PR campaign.

The marketing campaign was Sony. They directed her to talk about florals, not Justin.

yes I know. I meant that the marketing campaign was failing BEFORE Justin started his negative PR. so the negative PR was not the initial cause of the bad press she was getting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I never understood the outrage against her this summer. It seemed so manufactured or trollish. Well.

This thread was started in 2018. Folks have disliked Lively for a long time.

She can be a b$%h and have grounds for a sexual harassment suit at the same time.

For the zillionth time, that’s not all she is alleging. She thinks the social medial comparing tanked her shampoo but people haven’t liked her for years and weren’t going to buy her shampoo anyway.

You're focusing on the least part of what she's alleging. Just skipping all the other stuff. Why is that?

1. That’s the part that seems to be in all headlines, the focus on the times article, and the press releases. (And yes I read the complaint).

2. It’s a huge part of damages and without that piece, it’s questionable whether she would have brought her case.

She has like 8 counts. Strange that you don’t focus on the other 7.

I think if Baldoni’s PR agents had trolls planted on her shampoo promo social media posts, that’s a quite strong claim for her of retaliation, tortious interference & significant damages.