Mother of 2 from VERY prominent Richmond family arrested by FBI for child p@rn, exploitation, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

[Anonymous]

https://www.c-ville.com/in-brief-56

Look at the mention on this Charlottesville news site posted yesterday. It is buried at the bottom and her name is spelled as Hunter, as if they don’t know exactly who she is - a Hunton. Laughable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

NP here. But what you said what "it really took me back." That's what people say when a memory is triggered-- usually in a positive way. I was a bit shocked at your comment, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was also a church volunteer. Seeing her name in the same paragraph as youth ministry is sickening: https://myemail.constantcontact.com/St--Paul-s-Memorial-Church-Weekly-Update-for-August-23--2018.html?soid=1124684668493&aid=zdXIklZcnZA

Unfortunate however there are no rules or screening requirements for either.

As a former children's ministry volunteer, that is not entirely true. Yes, most churches don't screen volunteers like preschools etc do, but most do have safeguards in place, for example, in our church every person who works with children needs to take a securely abuse awareness course and no adult is allowed to be alone with children, there always need to be 2 or more adults with any children's activity. In addition, married or partnered couples are not allowed to be alone with children. Meaning my husband and I never taught a Sunday school class together and if we did, we would have needed an additional person there.

I think it varies, my church required fingerprint background checks for Sunday School teachers.

Nothing would have red flagged her prior to 2019, and since conviction was vacated on appeal (thanks Eppa!!!), likely nothing would after. There is value in checks, but, it is somewhat limited.

Most churches don't aggressively ensure there are always 2 adults around when they are working with children. As much as Boy Scouts is maligned, when my kids joined their troop was rabid about this rule. Even emails had to include more than one adult.

For over 20 years, our church has fingerprinted/background checked anyone working with children and definitely have the 2 person rule.

My mother volunteers at her church. All she has to do it sit there so that there is more than one adult with the kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.c-ville.com/in-brief-56

Look at the mention on this Charlottesville news site posted yesterday. It is buried at the bottom and her name is spelled as Hunter, as if they don’t know exactly who she is - a Hunton. Laughable.

Laughable was not the right word. Nothing on this situation and the burying of it is laughable. It is ridiculous and awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:https://www.c-ville.com/in-brief-56

Look at the mention on this Charlottesville news site posted yesterday. It is buried at the bottom and her name is spelled as Hunter, as if they don’t know exactly who she is - a Hunton. Laughable.

Charlottesville is a small, gossipy town. I guarantee you everyone who may have come in contact with her on a regular basis in the past few years already knows about this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How do so many people on this board know this woman?

That is not disturbing to anyone?

Given the number of UC HHI and trust fund babies on this site, how is this a surprise?? (Tangential thought:maybe UC perps like this woman are the reason so many UC posters insist they are “only” UMC or MC. There is FALSE sense that being middle class makes you some how safer to be around than LC or UC people.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

That is obviously not the same as "it took me back"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Looking at her picture, despite knowing what the charges are in this case, makes alarm bells in my head go off. There is something inherantly 'off' about her based on the photo posted. I can't put my finger on it, she just looks like she has 'issues'. This makes me so sad for children in today's world. I'm sure this isn't her first rodeo with this type of heinous crime. I hope other victims come forward. Monsters don't live in the dark anymore, they are know community members. Sad and sickening!

It's the huge pupils. So indicative of a manic episode (and/or drug use).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

That is obviously not the same as "it took me back"

You’re missing the point - the poster was expressing the clear mental deficiencies Eleanor had.

What is also apparent is that you are a pot stirrer - get a life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looking at her picture, despite knowing what the charges are in this case, makes alarm bells in my head go off. There is something inherantly 'off' about her based on the photo posted. I can't put my finger on it, she just looks like she has 'issues'. This makes me so sad for children in today's world. I'm sure this isn't her first rodeo with this type of heinous crime. I hope other victims come forward. Monsters don't live in the dark anymore, they are know community members. Sad and sickening!

It's the huge pupils. So indicative of a manic episode (and/or drug use).

Her eyes are very off.

People have posted elsewhere that she was generally well liked in the workplace. Allegedly she had been diagnosed with depression and bipolar. Many do not consistently comply with treatment for bipolar and any drug use or other addictive behaviors around sex and porn could make controlling it more difficult. Thank goodness she was caught.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

That is obviously not the same as "it took me back"

You’re missing the point - the poster was expressing the clear mental deficiencies Eleanor had.

What is also apparent is that you are a pot stirrer - get a life!

No she was not, she was mocking the seriousness of this thread with trivialities re: pedicures. Stop derailing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

That is obviously not the same as "it took me back"

You’re missing the point - the poster was expressing the clear mental deficiencies Eleanor had.

What is also apparent is that you are a pot stirrer - get a life!

No she was not, she was mocking the seriousness of this thread with trivialities re: pedicures. Stop derailing.

Not sure I'd be nattering on re: recent socializing with a known pedo nor would I be rushing to defend someone who runs with that crowd, esp following her 2019 arrest. But, you do you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really took me back

Took you back to what?!!

Have you never heard the expression "I was taken aback"?

That is obviously not the same as "it took me back"

Plus 100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How do so many people on this board know this woman?

That is not disturbing to anyone?

Given the number of UC HHI and trust fund babies on this site, how is this a surprise?? (Tangential thought:maybe UC perps like this woman are the reason so many UC posters insist they are “only” UMC or MC. There is FALSE sense that being middle class makes you some how safer to be around than LC or UC people.)

Well, statistically speaking, violent crime is disproportionately committed by LC people. Individual MC and UC may be dangerous, sure, but you're much more likely to be violently assaulted by someone at a swap meet as opposed to a country club.