Kate's New Picture

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That’s really awful if those poor kids see a marriage with DV in it. That’s worse than Charles and Diana but honestly it makes sense if William is violent. Diana admitted she’s the hothead and Charles rages and can get irritable too but never as dramatic as Diana.

Diana threw herself down the stairs while she was four months pregnant with William almost killing herself and the heir and the Queen who never frets was shaken up. They knew she was loony after that.

Diana once had an affair with a married man and called him 300 times in a day via payphone and had staffers call as well. The tabloids threatened her and she backed down from her lie that she didn’t know how to use a payphone.

There was also furniture breaking and vase breaking with one of her Middle Eastern lovers -I think the Pakistani heart surgeon dude. She would threaten suicide whenever she felt he wasn’t in love. Dodi and her were fighting in front of William .

God love her but She was a mess.

And Prince Charles reportedly once ripped a sink off the wall when he dropped his cuff link down the drain — in somebody else’s house.



https://www.ibtimes.com/king-charles-allegedly-grabbed-his-valet-smashed-window-during-temper-tantrums-book-3631497

He also made sure Diana’s bodyguard that she got close to was unalived.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4762514/amp/Was-bodyguard-Diana-fell-love-bumped-off.html

When told of the fatal crash by Prince Charles, she is said to have wept uncontrollably. The Prince informed his wife of the death as they were on their way to the Cannes Film Festival. Diana, then 25, is said to have frozen in horror. She tore at her clothes and scratched at her arms and legs, quite inconsolable.

During the flight to Cannes, she could not stop crying and on arrival, her gown had to be adjusted by her lady-in-waiting and dresser to cover the damage she had inflicted on her own body.

Of course, her torment was not known to the outside world. Details of her close relationship with the 6ft-tall East End ‘Jack the Lad’, whose father was a Ford car worker at Dagenham, emerged only some seven years later.

It followed Diana’s comments on a series of videos, parts of which became public, that she made to her speech coach, Peter Settelen, when she had recently separated from Prince Charles and was emotionally vulnerable.

As well as discussing her sex life and her husband’s relationship with Camilla Parker Bowles, she admitted she fell ‘deeply in love’ with someone very close.

Diana didn’t name Mannakee but referred to him as ‘somebody who worked in this environment’, adding: ‘He was the greatest fellow I have ever had. I was always waiting around trying to see him. Um, I just, you know, wore my heart on my sleeve. I was only happy when he was around.’

Asked by Settelen if he provided ‘the intimacy you weren’t getting’, she replied: ‘Yeah.’ The Princess went on: ‘I was quite happy to give it all up [her royal life], just to go off and live with him. Can you believe it?’ Laughing at the memory, she continued: ‘And he kept saying he thought it was a good idea, too.’

The bolded is the kind of opinion held by the “William beats Kate” crowd. Lady, what?

[Anonymous]

Imagine having a colostomy bag…you would be depressed.

Now imagine being told it isn’t reversible and would be your new normal.

How would you feel?

How would your spouse feel?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is in hiding with her parents and kids. He would have been seen with them on a "school run." He doesn't have them.. Piers Morgan said this is HUGE and he is close to Camila

Devil's advocate here: could this just be a temporary arrangement while she recovers? Because she wants to be away from the public eye but not separated from her kids. I'm not ruling out marital issues, just trying to consider all possibilities.

I don’t think so. She could get privacy and recover at the Palace if she wanted to and a colostomy bag doesn’t mean she can’t make a video statement from the neck up. She’s not dead because they can’t hide that. Her family who are very close was never seen going to London Clinic during her surgery and neither was Will which is unusual for what we know about the close knit Middletons. No pictures of cars leaving the palace to school so William being on the school run daily makes no sense .

Her staffers have also come out and said they don’t know what’s going on and there’s radio silence.

The Daily Mail, editor is friendly with the Middletons, has slowly been throwing punches at Will.

All roads are hinting at divorce

DP. In this country, the Supreme Court has made decisions and statements where they don't seem to realize how closely their every word is scrutinized and parsed, where they don't seem to realize that every decision is not just far reaching but actually changes the law everywhere, like an earthquake. They just seem naively unaware of their influence.

The BRF seems similar, to me. They know that their words and clothes and actions are scrutinized, but they don't know what that means. Kate has surgery, announces she'll be out until Easter - and now the entire world has her divorced, in a coma, the victim of all sorts of medical and marital maladies. When all she did was take some leave.

This post is crazy. Of course the Supreme Court knows that every single word they write will be scrutinized and parsed. Just like the BRF knows everything they will do will be scrutinized -- Kate Middleton is the exemplar of this. That's why people are freaked out; this latest series of missteps is so unlike Kate's usual MO that most people think Kate wasn't even behind any of this.

The Supreme Court has occasionally been unaware of the downstream effects of their decisions - because changes happen in lower courts and don't get to appeals courts for years and years. Issues may never arise to the Supreme Court. So they are unaware of the magnitude of their reach.

Re Kate-gate, what has happened: Kate took some leave, William skipped a commitment, there was a strange photo (I've heard various reasons why it might have been released like that with variable plausibility).

And now people have attributed multiple embarrassing or life threatening medical issues to Kate as well as calculating the state of her divorce and custody arrangements. (As well as multiple murders by the men in the BRF.). No, I don't think William or Kate had any idea any of this would happen because of their actions and statements. I think they thought they were behaving normally. The world thinks otherwise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People do realize that the rumors about crohns are entirely made up by internet side car detectives along with the colostomy bags.

+100

Everything here is entirely made up. Except for the fact that picture was photoshopped

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does one perpetrate DV when there are hundreds of servants around?
Kate doesn’t seem like she’d stand for that.

She seems like she would.

Meghan in the disaster Oprah interview even said she felt a soft spot for Kate and she was “going through her own thing” .

They have lived apart before. Seems a bit more extreme than making him sleep on the couch - but they have had fights before and they probably will again. That doesn't mean that Kate "takes it" though.

The British media knows that they’ve been living apart for a long while. They monitor the RT helicopter activity from Kensington Palace to Adelaide Cottage.

This is interesting. I tried googling for cites, do you have one?

British tabloids. They are pissed about the expense for the helicopters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People do realize that the rumors about crohns are entirely made up by internet side car detectives along with the colostomy bags.

Yes, most people recognize that in the absence of officially verified details about multiple hot mess situations, people are speculating— some with more support for their speculations than others. Most also recognize that this thread is in the Entertainment forum.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine having a colostomy bag…you would be depressed.

Now imagine being told it isn’t reversible and would be your new normal.

How would you feel?

How would your spouse feel?

She doesn’t have a bag. It is r entirely made up without anyone close to BRF or media speak to it as a realistic possibility.

It’s as likely as a brain tumor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does one perpetrate DV when there are hundreds of servants around?
Kate doesn’t seem like she’d stand for that.

She seems like she would.

Meghan in the disaster Oprah interview even said she felt a soft spot for Kate and she was “going through her own thing” .

They have lived apart before. Seems a bit more extreme than making him sleep on the couch - but they have had fights before and they probably will again. That doesn't mean that Kate "takes it" though.

The British media knows that they’ve been living apart for a long while. They monitor the RT helicopter activity from Kensington Palace to Adelaide Cottage.

This is interesting. I tried googling for cites, do you have one?

British tabloids. They are pissed about the expense for the helicopters.

Then you should be able to link those stories from those tabloids, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People do realize that the rumors about crohns are entirely made up by internet side car detectives along with the colostomy bags.

+100

Everything here is entirely made up. Except for the fact that picture was photoshopped

Sorry you feel that this is all out of your control--you want the discussion to stop, it won't, and you can't do anything about it. How frustrating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Imagine having a colostomy bag…you would be depressed.

Now imagine being told it isn’t reversible and would be your new normal.

How would you feel?

How would your spouse feel?

You don’t understand her entire role is to support causes dear to her heart.

Patronages generally reflect the interests of the member of the Royal Family involved, for example, The Queen – when Duchess of Cornwall – took on the Presidency of the Royal Osteoporosis Society as both her mother and grandmother died as a result of the brittle bone disease.

If that were the case she would be supporting the disease she has or should be and with it the people using the same colostomy bags etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine having a colostomy bag…you would be depressed.

Now imagine being told it isn’t reversible and would be your new normal.

How would you feel?

How would your spouse feel?

You don’t understand her entire role is to support causes dear to her heart.

Patronages generally reflect the interests of the member of the Royal Family involved, for example, The Queen – when Duchess of Cornwall – took on the Presidency of the Royal Osteoporosis Society as both her mother and grandmother died as a result of the brittle bone disease.

If that were the case she would be supporting the disease she has or should be and with it the people using the same colostomy bags etc

How very dare Kate not support the charity trying to end a disease that Kate doesn’t have because she’s recovering from her eating disorder huh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine having a colostomy bag…you would be depressed.

Now imagine being told it isn’t reversible and would be your new normal.

How would you feel?

How would your spouse feel?

You don’t understand her entire role is to support causes dear to her heart.

Patronages generally reflect the interests of the member of the Royal Family involved, for example, The Queen – when Duchess of Cornwall – took on the Presidency of the Royal Osteoporosis Society as both her mother and grandmother died as a result of the brittle bone disease.

If that were the case she would be supporting the disease she has or should be and with it the people using the same colostomy bags etc

How very dare Kate not support the charity trying to end a disease that Kate doesn’t have because she’s recovering from her eating disorder huh.

Exactly, they would’ve released the disease otherwise because it would have proved for another reason for the royal family to be found useful and not just grubbing up tax $$$

[Anonymous]

Lots of new stuff published on Sundays in British media.

Going to go read that for new info bc nothing new here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Imagine having a colostomy bag…you would be depressed.

Now imagine being told it isn’t reversible and would be your new normal.

How would you feel?

How would your spouse feel?

You don’t understand her entire role is to support causes dear to her heart.

Patronages generally reflect the interests of the member of the Royal Family involved, for example, The Queen – when Duchess of Cornwall – took on the Presidency of the Royal Osteoporosis Society as both her mother and grandmother died as a result of the brittle bone disease.

If that were the case she would be supporting the disease she has or should be and with it the people using the same colostomy bags etc

How very dare Kate not support the charity trying to end a disease that Kate doesn’t have because she’s recovering from her eating disorder huh.

Exactly, they would’ve released the disease otherwise because it would have proved for another reason for the royal family to be found useful and not just grubbing up tax $$$

Exactly, everyone knows politesse requires sharing diagnoses even before recovery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She is in hiding with her parents and kids. He would have been seen with them on a "school run." He doesn't have them.. Piers Morgan said this is HUGE and he is close to Camila

Devil's advocate here: could this just be a temporary arrangement while she recovers? Because she wants to be away from the public eye but not separated from her kids. I'm not ruling out marital issues, just trying to consider all possibilities.

Sure. That then makes it even odder though. A straightforward statement that Kate is recuperating with the temporary support of her parents is something that few would question and most would understand. There’s no need to even mention where she is while she’s recuperating. Will, though, repeatedly mentioned early on that he would not be working until after Easter either, using “the school run” as a reason for this. And details like that then start to get parsed —especially when they conflict with other details that have been put out there, even as we wonder what the team of Nannie’s does all day while William claims to shoulder burden of the school runs. I will say that William’s excuse makes a lot more sense if the school runs are from Bucklebury or from Anmer Hall vs the short commute from Adelaide Cottage.