Travis and Taylor

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I doubt Charli XCX cares she's far more talented than Swift anyway.

Charli XCX who has admitted she can't sing (or play any instruments) and has to use autotune for all her "songs"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I doubt Charli XCX cares she's far more talented than Swift anyway.

Charli XCX is the most monotone, talentless, boring "entertainer."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just saw something about Taylor releasing extra tracks to block Charli XCX’s album from getting the #1 spot when it debuts.


Such a petty, dick move.

So, this is nonsensical. First, that’s not how buying music works. I get that you all like this story line but you’re grasping hard. It’s desperate and lacks credibility. These releases are pre planned. Stop trying to make a controversy happen. I’ve seen this all over the internet and it’s so lame. Do you really think someone didn’t buy BE album so they could buy a new variant? They did not. Buy yourself some ability to process information.

+1
So many sad, pathetic posters here who feel they have to lie because they hate TS so much.

[Anonymous]

Taylor is so messy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't wait for the PR response to Matty's engagement. She won't address it directly, of course, but I bet we're about to get flooded with PR puff pieces about how blissfully in love she & Travis are.

+1. I am actually very sad for her. I think deep down she is dying at the moment, but she has to keep doing it with a broken heart and will up the PR 😢 I recall seeing a video of her leaving her Eras concert in Ohio last summer and bawling inconsolably in her car, prob because of Healy.

Taylor has been pining for Matty for years, but her feelings were never reciprocated. He never saw her as any more than a fling. She just released an album professing to have deep feelings for him, maybe even being the love of her life, but he never felt the same way. He got engaged to another woman. How much clearer can it be to her.

she egged herself on and probably was egged on by some friends that he was her one true love. i honestly don't think she cared so much for him consistently. she needs to move one and stop living in fantasy land.

She did move on. You realize songs and albums don't just materialize the next day...

I doubt it. She just played Maroon & Cornelia Street as surprise songs in Liverpool tonight. Both about Matty.

Both of those songs are about Joe Alwyn. You are seriously unhinged.
DP

You are wrong. She referenced Maroon in Sam or Chloe or Sophia or Marcus on the new album, which is about Matty. And she talks about getting drunk on his roommates rosé. His bandmate and former roommate loves rosé. Joe has never had a roommate. She also mentions how she lost him, and how she wakes with his memory over her. This has absolutely nothing to do with Joe.

I don’t think Maroon is about Joe, but Cornelia Street is so obviously about him that she did a pap walk down Cornelia Street after their breakup to show her fans she was okay. (And also a reminder of how performative she is…)

She used to rent an apartment on Cornelia Street and likely used it with both men. Tonight she was angry, sad, devastated… Went from “And I hope I never lose you, and I hope it never ends” in Cornelia St. to “And I lost you in Maroon.” A day after the engagement announcement. Yah, those songs are related and about one and the same man, and it’s not Joe.

The songs are about Joe. She sang those songs because people like them and she doesn't want to sing them when Travis is there, which will be soon.

Taylor's feeling fine tonight - she's posting on Instagram while watching the Chiefs get their Super Bowl rings. You are so lost.

+1
The PP is seriously obsessed, to the point of being unhinged. I have to wonder how she functions in the day-to-day world.

This applies to Taylor Swift too though. And she seems to function just fine. Tay is definitely obsessive: about men, fame, feuds, herself….

[Anonymous]

The criticism Taylor gets for her ambition & drive is insane. No one is telling Simone Biles to stop being the GOAT so “others can have a chance.” Taylor plays to win, just like most successful athletes, business owners, artists, etc. It’s a double standard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Taylor is so messy.

Nah she keeps her side of the street clean

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

The Guardian has an article about it that may help put it in perspective: https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/jun/14/taylor-swift-may-have-captured-the-charts-but-charli-xcx-captured-the-zeitgeist

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

The Guardian has an article about it that may help put it in perspective: https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/jun/14/taylor-swift-may-have-captured-the-charts-but-charli-xcx-captured-the-zeitgeist

Everyone is free to do the same. Charlie whoever did it too. Taylor Swift just does it better. That’s the summary of the article. You’re welcome.

[Anonymous]

No one came for SZA when SOS blocked Midnights.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

The Guardian has an article about it that may help put it in perspective: https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/jun/14/taylor-swift-may-have-captured-the-charts-but-charli-xcx-captured-the-zeitgeist

Everyone is free to do the same. Charlie whoever did it too. Taylor Swift just does it better. That’s the summary of the article. You’re welcome.

It also points out that she cares more about being #1 on the charts than she does about putting out quality music, which is accurate

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

The Guardian has an article about it that may help put it in perspective: https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/jun/14/taylor-swift-may-have-captured-the-charts-but-charli-xcx-captured-the-zeitgeist

Everyone is free to do the same. Charlie whoever did it too. Taylor Swift just does it better. That’s the summary of the article. You’re welcome.

It also points out that she cares more about being #1 on the charts than she does about putting out quality music, which is accurate

That's an opinion, not fact, and "quality music" is subjective. The is no disputing the facts stated above. Everyone is free to do the same. Fact. Charlie whoever that is also did it. Fact. Taylor Swift does it better. Fact, based on records broken, etc. It's just statistics, not a statement about quality of anything. Why are people so threatened by her success? Who cares? Other than the artists themselves?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused. Wasn’t Charlie XCX’s new album released over a week ago?

Yes, it’s just projected to go to #1 in the UK now. Anyone know if it’s true that TS geo-locked the variants to only be available in the UK?

God you’re all so ridiculously invested in making her a villain as her mega fans are in making her a mastermind. It’s so tiring. Nobody is doing all of these Machiavellian things.

It’s easily verifiable that she dropped UK-only tracks

I dislike album variants and wouldn’t buy any but Taylor’s music is not preventing people from buying Billie’s or Charlie’s music. Taylor or her label are simply trying to keep her album at #1 by releasing more tracks.

That’s what I’m saying. She’s dropping variants to stay at #1 when other artists release their albums. Thank you 🙏

And? Are they really competitors, she and whoever this other woman is? She released her album over a week ago according to the above. This isn't where everyone gets a participation trophy. Taylor Swift can release whatever she wants whenever she wants wherever she wants, just like the other woman is. It's a business. Being at #1 means something. Taylor Swift is just better at it.

There’s no time she could drop anything and NOT be “competing” with some other female artist. It’s so weird that anyone frames it this way.

The Guardian has an article about it that may help put it in perspective: https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/jun/14/taylor-swift-may-have-captured-the-charts-but-charli-xcx-captured-the-zeitgeist

Everyone is free to do the same. Charlie whoever did it too. Taylor Swift just does it better. That’s the summary of the article. You’re welcome.

It also points out that she cares more about being #1 on the charts than she does about putting out quality music, which is accurate

Who is forcing all these people to buy and stream low quality music?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The criticism Taylor gets for her ambition & drive is insane. No one is telling Simone Biles to stop being the GOAT so “others can have a chance.” Taylor plays to win, just like most successful athletes, business owners, artists, etc. It’s a double standard.

That is because Simone Biles doesn’t make money hand over fist for her work. Nor does she use crap tactics to make more money. Simone has some endorsements, but is clearly doing gymnastics because she is gifted and not looking to grift her fans in the way Taylor does.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The criticism Taylor gets for her ambition & drive is insane. No one is telling Simone Biles to stop being the GOAT so “others can have a chance.” Taylor plays to win, just like most successful athletes, business owners, artists, etc. It’s a double standard.

That is because Simone Biles doesn’t make money hand over fist for her work. Nor does she use crap tactics to make more money. Simone has some endorsements, but is clearly doing gymnastics because she is gifted and not looking to grift her fans in the way Taylor does.

So it’s jealousy?