Harvard tell Trump to pound sand

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

Evidence that Harvard offers remedial reading classes?

Remedial math https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2024/9/3/new-math-intro-course/

You do understand math and reading are different right? Maybe you need some remedial reading.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’s endowment is massive. Why is it it getting federal funding? Frankly I think if you’re a private school you should be getting funding elsewhere and just the state universities should be receiving it.

But to continue your thread of logic, why should a state university receive federal funding? If private universities should be completely privately funded, state universities should be completely state funded. The federal government should stick to West Point, Annapolis, Air Force, Coast Guard, etc.

State universities can be better held accountable to tax payers, their research is often broader and aligns with national interests and they are meant to serve the general public.

There is no difference in accountability for federal research grants between private and public universities. They apply for grants the same way and abide by the same regulations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

Show me where Harvard University was pointing out grammatical mistakes? I bet you can't because Harvard did not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

You are tiresome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harvard’s endowment is massive. Why is it it getting federal funding? Frankly I think if you’re a private school you should be getting funding elsewhere and just the state universities should be receiving it.

But to continue your thread of logic, why should a state university receive federal funding? If private universities should be completely privately funded, state universities should be completely state funded. The federal government should stick to West Point, Annapolis, Air Force, Coast Guard, etc.

State universities can be better held accountable to tax payers, their research is often broader and aligns with national interests and they are meant to serve the general public.

There is no difference in accountability for federal research grants between private and public universities. They apply for grants the same way and abide by the same regulations.

Great! Then not a big deal to give money to state universities instead of Harvard.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

We get it. Your kids didn’t get in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

So, does Liberty, in the same way, discriminate against atheists?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

Go read the SCOTUS decision ruling Harvard racially discriminated against Asians and it spells out in detail hoe Harvard discriminated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

Go read the SCOTUS decision ruling Harvard racially discriminated against Asians and it spells out in detail hoe Harvard discriminated.

Are you alleging that they are doing the same thing now that they did before they lost the court case?

Or do you admit that they no longer do that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

Go read the SCOTUS decision ruling Harvard racially discriminated against Asians and it spells out in detail hoe Harvard discriminated.

Follow up: If you believe in primarily merit-based admissions and hiring, how do you explain Trump's cabinet?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

Go read the SCOTUS decision ruling Harvard racially discriminated against Asians and it spells out in detail hoe Harvard discriminated.

Are you alleging that they are doing the same thing now that they did before they lost the court case?

Or do you admit that they no longer do that?

During the court case, they said losing would change the demographics of who was admitted substantially. After losing the case, this didn't happen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

Go read the SCOTUS decision ruling Harvard racially discriminated against Asians and it spells out in detail hoe Harvard discriminated.

Are you alleging that they are doing the same thing now that they did before they lost the court case?

Or do you admit that they no longer do that?

During the court case, they said losing would change the demographics of who was admitted substantially. After losing the case, this didn't happen.

You proved my point.

Harvard just changed some titles and names around and carries on like there was no SCOTUS case and keeps discriminating against Asians, thus the habitual racist Harvard is disobeying the Supreme Court which is a threat to democracy and Asians.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Linda McMahon wrote Harvard a letter, to which they responded by noting areas that are in need of corrections and then posted it on social media.

https://bsky.app/profile/societyschild.bsky.social/post/3lojzklj2hc2w

I hope that story gets picked up because it’s hilarious. We need people to treat the folks in the administration as they should be treated, like children.

Even more hilarious when the university pointing out grammatical mistakes has to iffer remedial reading classes to its students when it is supposedly the best university.

Very funny indeed. Those who live in glass house shouldn't be a habitual racist throwing stones.

They also discrimination against Asians. They refuse to obey the SCOTUS rulings and continue to discriminate against Asians by renaming their racist DEI office to something else.

How does Harvard, which uses a holistic admissions process, "discriminate" against Asians?

Go read the SCOTUS decision ruling Harvard racially discriminated against Asians and it spells out in detail hoe Harvard discriminated.

Are you alleging that they are doing the same thing now that they did before they lost the court case?

Or do you admit that they no longer do that?

During the court case, they said losing would change the demographics of who was admitted substantially. After losing the case, this didn't happen.

You proved my point.

Harvard just changed some titles and names around and carries on like there was no SCOTUS case and keeps discriminating against Asians, thus the habitual racist Harvard is disobeying the Supreme Court which is a threat to democracy and Asians.

It seems that you're depraved arrogance is not what Harvard was looking for in one of their admitted classes. I don't think it has anything to do with you being Asian or any other race. No one wants to be on a dcum thread with you, much less have to be in college with you.