Joe is out

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I am seeing a lot of excitement on social media for Kamala today. What's your experience?

They needed a few days to program all the bots. That's why he didn't withdraw during the RNC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sorry young people, Kamala hates you:

OMG, Kamala’s voice is the worst.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI: A cudgel used by racists pretending every single person of color didn't earn what they have while ignoring the white 2.0 GPA "legacies" and those with daddies writing checks, who get into the Ivies or a business school where their brother knew someone.

I suspect those who bleat "DEI" also had no problem voting for a VP who needed five mediocre colleges and six years, just to get a communications degree.

Funny how you can be some GED felon and get votes from the same people who think Justice Jackson is a "DEI" hire. But sure, no racism involved in your thought-process while we see the buffoons who get elected on the right.

Defending DEI and blasting its critics mindlessly as “racist” is just not the centrist platform the Dems need right now to turn this election around.

It isn't about defending it, it's about pointing out the extremely low standards required of WHITE politicians on the right while in the same breathe as calling anyone non-white a "DEI" hire.

That you called it "mindless" when anyone with even two, functioning brain cells can see the racism from those who attack it, is your limitation.

The same people who think Boebert is qualified to be in Congress, think Jackson has no business being on the SC, despite the fact that she is more qualified than several of her white counterparts. Tough sh*t if you can handle the glaring hypocrisy from the right. We all see it. The Obamas had to be the "Huxtables" while Trump could get away with being Bill Cosby. Spare me your inability to see the cancer of racism being the entire reason someone as disgusting as Trump IS the Republican party. That stupid man wouldn't know the constitution if Madison used puppets to explain to him. The moment he used racism was the moment he galvanized the party. Mediocrity for one race, rules the GOP and has for a long time. It's why someone as unqualified as Dubya became president. It's why a moron like Palin got to be a nominee. The GOP has NO standards.

I think I’m in love.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ms Harris’s step daughter is literally a wack job nut. She posts some crazy stuff.

Her own personal Billy Carter

Donald Trump is his own Billy Carter.

Best quote ever

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I got to think Trump would love Kamala as the Dem nominee. He should probably not attack her until the Dems choose their candidate on the off chance they are actually crazy enough to let her run.

You wouldn’t have to say a thing Harris will make herself look like a fool

All the cries of racism and misogyny to try and silence any critics, but anyone with two brain cells and see if she has not fit to be president

Exactly. Democrats have played their ridiculous racism/misogyny card one time too many. Any candidate is fair game to be critiqued on their record. And Kamala has been a joke.

I really don't see much of a difference between the two-that's why she was his running mate, to complement his presidency while still having diversity points. They both laugh off questions and use laughter to condemn whoever is debating them. They have very similar policy objectives. The reason Harris could defend Joe so well was because he does the work she wants done.

Oh I see, now it was Harris who was running the Biden White House? I thought it was Dr Biden and Hunter, but now it was his VP all along?

Seriously, enjoy the next few months, maga.

I mean, yeah...you said nothing surprising. It's like snarkly responding with a fact. Do you think Biden would've chosen someone ideologically opposed to be his VP? Yes, the VP has a position that allows them to operate some parts of the white house. Do you think its just a "shadow the boss for 4 years" position?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One of the most successful 1-term presidents in history.

+1

Let me guess - your student loans were forgiven? Success!! You live in Georgia and got an extra "stipend" right before the Senate run off? Success!

Let me guess - you got a tax cut that was much smaller than what the billionaires and corporations got in 2017? Oh, and then, it's going to be clawed back over the next several years! Success!

[Anonymous]

A PP said people wouldn't vote for Kamala because she's never had children. What?? That's ridiculous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DEI: A cudgel used by racists pretending every single person of color didn't earn what they have while ignoring the white 2.0 GPA "legacies" and those with daddies writing checks, who get into the Ivies or a business school where their brother knew someone.

I suspect those who bleat "DEI" also had no problem voting for a VP who needed five mediocre colleges and six years, just to get a communications degree.

Funny how you can be some GED felon and get votes from the same people who think Justice Jackson is a "DEI" hire. But sure, no racism involved in your thought-process while we see the buffoons who get elected on the right.

Defending DEI and blasting its critics mindlessly as “racist” is just not the centrist platform the Dems need right now to turn this election around.

It isn't about defending it, it's about pointing out the extremely low standards required of WHITE politicians on the right while in the same breathe as calling anyone non-white a "DEI" hire.

That you called it "mindless" when anyone with even two, functioning brain cells can see the racism from those who attack it, is your limitation.

The same people who think Boebert is qualified to be in Congress, think Jackson has no business being on the SC, despite the fact that she is more qualified than several of her white counterparts. Tough sh*t if you can handle the glaring hypocrisy from the right. We all see it. The Obamas had to be the "Huxtables" while Trump could get away with being Bill Cosby. Spare me your inability to see the cancer of racism being the entire reason someone as disgusting as Trump IS the Republican party. That stupid man wouldn't know the constitution if Madison used puppets to explain to him. The moment he used racism was the moment he galvanized the party. Mediocrity for one race, rules the GOP and has for a long time. It's why someone as unqualified as Dubya became president. It's why a moron like Palin got to be a nominee. The GOP has NO standards.

Boebert was voted into her current position. Harris couldn't even win a primary for President. How will they credibly argue she can win swing states?

Harris got into the Senate and she didn’t even have to have a billionaire buy her a seat like JD did.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A PP said people wouldn't vote for Kamala because she's never had children. What?? That's ridiculous.

But they don’t want us mentioning their misogyny!

They also thought Trump’s ear getting nicked would result in a landslide election for him but he hasn’t gotten any kind of bump in the polls.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is so stupid and the Democratic machine just handed Trump a landslide

I disagree. Trump’s convention speech was a complete disaster. The convention was a total clown show. JD Vance has no experience and nobody actually knows what it is that he stands for since he changes his stance so much. The GOP wanted Joe to stay in the race. Kamala can speak coherently about abortion rights, J6 and Project 2025.

None of which the voting public considers their pressing issues. LOL. her candidacy is a joke. Cannot wait for the debate. And it turns out the instincts of JD Vance were correct.

Her candidacy has been all of 8 minutes and you are calling it a joke.

Yes. Based on her past performance.

Really? You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?

WTF is with me he ridiculous coconut tree references?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A PP said people wouldn't vote for Kamala because she's never had children. What?? That's ridiculous.

Well none of the Fat man’s children look like him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I got to think Trump would love Kamala as the Dem nominee. He should probably not attack her until the Dems choose their candidate on the off chance they are actually crazy enough to let her run.

You wouldn’t have to say a thing Harris will make herself look like a fool

All the cries of racism and misogyny to try and silence any critics, but anyone with two brain cells and see if she has not fit to be president

Exactly. Democrats have played their ridiculous racism/misogyny card one time too many. Any candidate is fair game to be critiqued on their record. And Kamala has been a joke.

I really don't see much of a difference between the two-that's why she was his running mate, to complement his presidency while still having diversity points. They both laugh off questions and use laughter to condemn whoever is debating them. They have very similar policy objectives. The reason Harris could defend Joe so well was because he does the work she wants done.

Oh I see, now it was Harris who was running the Biden White House? I thought it was Dr Biden and Hunter, but now it was his VP all along?

Seriously, enjoy the next few months, maga.

I mean, yeah...you said nothing surprising. It's like snarkly responding with a fact. Do you think Biden would've chosen someone ideologically opposed to be his VP? Yes, the VP has a position that allows them to operate some parts of the white house. Do you think it’s just a "shadow the boss for 4 years" position?

You don’t even understand what I wrote. God bless you. No one else will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would vote for ANYONE over Trump.

And I will enthusiastically go out to get votes for Harris.

Harris will always be herself - which is a bad temper, no manners, ill fitting pantsuits and faux pearls. The "face" she puts on for the public is who she is. She will never get the votes with it.

Clearly. That's why you and the trumpers are running around on social media rn like chickens with your head cut off.

That’s how deliriously happy people react. Dems are so busy being offended and enraged about stuff they don’t recognize pure joy when they see it.

I honestly don’t understand the deliriously happy reactions. The guy you were beating just stepped aside. I would think they’d want him to stay in the race.

Biden was the highest performing opponent in those polls.

No, he wasn't. Trump would prefer Biden. It's a known entity.

+1
That’s been his entire focus over the past 4 years.

+1 what personal aspect of Harris' life will Trump go after? How she's not a "real American", unlike his immigrant wife who used chain migration to bring her communist parents to the US?

Exactly.
“F Joe Biden!”
“Sleepy Joe”
“Let’s Go Brandon”
“Hey, he’s out! Hell yeah! Back to your basement sleepy Joe!”

“Ok. Now what…?”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does Kamala do on the polls?

Better than Biden, but not good enough. She needs to get on stage and debate Trump.

He’ll eat her alive. Sad but true!

She's younger and can manage to memorize answers. Trump will seem confused by comparison. If I were Trump, I would refuse any debate. Even if she's as likeable as dishwater, she's more coherent.

She made Justice Beer cry.

I’m voting for the woman who made Brett Kavanaugh cry

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How will the Kackler explain this?

This is not the winner you think it is, but by all means.

I have a feeling she won't be shy about running those felon and insurrection instigator ads. Guess which ones people will care more about.