RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

I doubt you'll read this because it will break the information bubble you're in, but here you go.

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/media-liberal-bias-npr-free-press-trump-russia-mueller-collusion.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Like I said, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened to or read NPR. Take a break from the rat wing propaganda wheel and indulge yourself in some NPR. It’ll be the first time you ever listened to it, though I bet I know how you operate and you will not.

Because reality does have a liberal bias. You completely ignored the PP who posted a link to an article that would show you that the Republican Party is working with Russia. You don’t want to see that proof, because I think cognitive dissonance takes a toll on people and you blocking out reality is easier than trying to find ways to ignore evidence.

And that’s what this thread is about: how sources of media that are usually dinged as “liberal” aren’t really liberal at all. They present an anti-liberal slant for all their stories. It denies reality and damages us as a nation to be lied to.

But really: try consuming only NPR for a week. See how you feel.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Like I said, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened to or read NPR. Take a break from the rat wing propaganda wheel and indulge yourself in some NPR. It’ll be the first time you ever listened to it, though I bet I know how you operate and you will not.

Because reality does have a liberal bias. You completely ignored the PP who posted a link to an article that would show you that the Republican Party is working with Russia. You don’t want to see that proof, because I think cognitive dissonance takes a toll on people and you blocking out reality is easier than trying to find ways to ignore evidence.

And that’s what this thread is about: how sources of media that are usually dinged as “liberal” aren’t really liberal at all. They present an anti-liberal slant for all their stories. It denies reality and damages us as a nation to be lied to.

But really: try consuming only NPR for a week. See how you feel.

This, from the Former NPR vice president for news and ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin pretty much says it all.
At least some people can admit the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Like I said, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened to or read NPR. Take a break from the rat wing propaganda wheel and indulge yourself in some NPR. It’ll be the first time you ever listened to it, though I bet I know how you operate and you will not.

Because reality does have a liberal bias. You completely ignored the PP who posted a link to an article that would show you that the Republican Party is working with Russia. You don’t want to see that proof, because I think cognitive dissonance takes a toll on people and you blocking out reality is easier than trying to find ways to ignore evidence.

And that’s what this thread is about: how sources of media that are usually dinged as “liberal” aren’t really liberal at all. They present an anti-liberal slant for all their stories. It denies reality and damages us as a nation to be lied to.

But really: try consuming only NPR for a week. See how you feel.

This, from the Former NPR vice president for news and ombudsman Jeffrey Dvorkin pretty much says it all.
At least some people can admit the truth.

[…]

Go on, try it for one week.

[Anonymous]

So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

He is a senior editor and he gave thoughts re: the Mueller report, and it was APPARENT he didn’t read it.
And he’s a senior editor?
If I were his boss, I’d be alarmed.
When did he check out? How long has he not been doing the work required of him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

He is a senior editor and he gave thoughts re: the Mueller report, and it was APPARENT he didn’t read it.
And he’s a senior editor?
If I were his boss, I’d be alarmed.
When did he check out? How long has he not been doing the work required of him?

His comments were totally accurate.
NPR seems to want to remain a liberal echo chamber.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

5 Days without pay. He’ll be okay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

He is a senior editor and he gave thoughts re: the Mueller report, and it was APPARENT he didn’t read it.
And he’s a senior editor?
If I were his boss, I’d be alarmed.
When did he check out? How long has he not been doing the work required of him?

His comments were totally accurate.
NPR seems to want to remain a liberal echo chamber.

They were not. Like not at all. He’s supposed to be informed. He’s not. And it’s unfortunate because it’s hard to take the rest of what he said seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

He is a senior editor and he gave thoughts re: the Mueller report, and it was APPARENT he didn’t read it.
And he’s a senior editor?
If I were his boss, I’d be alarmed.
When did he check out? How long has he not been doing the work required of him?

His comments were totally accurate.
NPR seems to want to remain a liberal echo chamber.

They were not. Like not at all. He’s supposed to be informed. He’s not. And it’s unfortunate because it’s hard to take the rest of what he said seriously.

Oh, he is. Obviously NPR is a bastion of left wing bias. The sad thing is that people in this forum honestly don’t recognize it they live in such a bubble

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, NPR cannot tolerate any dissent from the liberal narrative.
#DefundNPR

He is a senior editor and he gave thoughts re: the Mueller report, and it was APPARENT he didn’t read it.
And he’s a senior editor?
If I were his boss, I’d be alarmed.
When did he check out? How long has he not been doing the work required of him?

And now if they investigate his work further and find that his work is unprofessional to the level that he should be fired, he’ll cry all the way to Fox.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.

Good grief. You talk about being "siloed" when that is EXACTLY what you are.
And, your statement above is simply laughable.

Don't bother meeting reality. You claim "reality has a liberal bias."
When that "reality" denies facts and evidence because they are inconvenient to the narrative and ignores stories that don't meet with the approval of the liberal audience, I guess you are right. The reality is groups like NPR are choosing a "reality" that is not grounded in truth.

Do you have cites for your claim? I have one based on some reporting from earlier today: NPR journos were instructed to report an HRC lie for every time Trump lied. When they were asked how to handle if one candidate didn't lie as much as the other, they were met with silence.