RW vs LW news

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

x1000

There is no excuse to keep focusing on what is an increasingly small fringe and ignoring the real world impacts on women and the increasing majority who thinks women should be treated like people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

x1000

There is no excuse to keep focusing on what is an increasingly small fringe and ignoring the real world impacts on women and the increasing majority who thinks women should be treated like people.

The "increasing majority" believe there should be limits on abortion.
Not the radical Democrats, though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^^


This is why the whole trope about "liberal main stream media" is a crock.

x1000

There is no excuse to keep focusing on what is an increasingly small fringe and ignoring the real world impacts on women and the increasing majority who thinks women should be treated like people.

The "increasing majority" believe there should be limits on abortion.
Not the radical Democrats, though.

LOL, 70% of the country support Roe. Yes, Roe has limits, which is NO third term abortion unless the fetus is no longer viable or the health/life of the mother is at stake. The forced birthers basically want no abortion and even if the life of the mother is at stake, even if the mother's ability to get pregnant again is at risk, no incest exception, no rape exception.

So when you say "no limits on abortion" - what you call "radical democrats" are the mainstream of all the USA. No one carries a baby to the 6th month and says "you know what, I changed my mind" - no one.

But you do you.

[Anonymous]

These women are not the brightest bulbs.......

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust

WATCH: NPR's senior business editor Uri Berliner details how the newsroom was overtaken by Trump Derangement Syndrome after 2016 and how the "media" uncritically pushed Adam Schiff's garbage Russia collusion theory because they wanted to damage President Trump in an interview with Bari Weiss:

"...Trump's election, you know, I think like every newsroom, every legacy media knows when we were shocked, disturb, distraught, really troubled, we assumed Hillary Clinton was going to win. And, and she didn't, and it was a really an unsettling experience. But I also think, to me, it revealed that we didn't really understand a lot of what was going on in America, that we were out of touch. But I think also we we kind of locked down after a while, I think after a while we started covering Trump in a way that that, like a lot of legacy news organization, that we were trying to damage his presidency. Anything we could to harm him. And I think what we latched on to was Russia collusion, like a lot of news organizations, which was, as I write sort of catnip, although it was just rumors, and a lot of it based on pretty shoddy documents or evidence there was it wasn't really solid."

Berliner adds: "A lot of newspapers use documents or anonymous sources. We really latched on to Adam Schiff. He was like our muse to the Trump collusion story. We had him on constantly, a lot. I think I counted 25 times. You know, and, and in most of those conversations, he sort of alluded to evidence he may have had or sort of teased out, yeah, Russia, you know, he was colluding, or the campaign was colluding with Russia. And then the Muller report came out and no collusion. And, you know, I think we sort of let the story kind of disappear... Despite our feelings about Trump, this is a story we should have sort of treated differently."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

New York Times exists now as a sort of mainstream Republican org that just can’t wrap its head around where the country is now and they keep both sides’ing and trying to present a pork chop and a crap sandwich like they’re the same thing, because they remember when the crap sandwich was maybe mostly lamb with a crap crust.

They keep trying to elevate the GOP’s fascism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
https://www.thefp.com/p/npr-editor-how-npr-lost-americas-trust

WATCH: NPR's senior business editor Uri Berliner details how the newsroom was overtaken by Trump Derangement Syndrome after 2016 and how the "media" uncritically pushed Adam Schiff's garbage Russia collusion theory because they wanted to damage President Trump in an interview with Bari Weiss:

"...Trump's election, you know, I think like every newsroom, every legacy media knows when we were shocked, disturb, distraught, really troubled, we assumed Hillary Clinton was going to win. And, and she didn't, and it was a really an unsettling experience. But I also think, to me, it revealed that we didn't really understand a lot of what was going on in America, that we were out of touch. But I think also we we kind of locked down after a while, I think after a while we started covering Trump in a way that that, like a lot of legacy news organization, that we were trying to damage his presidency. Anything we could to harm him. And I think what we latched on to was Russia collusion, like a lot of news organizations, which was, as I write sort of catnip, although it was just rumors, and a lot of it based on pretty shoddy documents or evidence there was it wasn't really solid."

Berliner adds: "A lot of newspapers use documents or anonymous sources. We really latched on to Adam Schiff. He was like our muse to the Trump collusion story. We had him on constantly, a lot. I think I counted 25 times. You know, and, and in most of those conversations, he sort of alluded to evidence he may have had or sort of teased out, yeah, Russia, you know, he was colluding, or the campaign was colluding with Russia. And then the Muller report came out and no collusion. And, you know, I think we sort of let the story kind of disappear... Despite our feelings about Trump, this is a story we should have sort of treated differently."

This is a reminder that the Mueller Report found multiple contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian nationals during the campaign season. Manafort, who was part of the Trump campaign, gave a Russian national polling data. There were multiple efforts by the Russians to influence the vote through social media. "Collusion" is a meaningless term. The 2nd part of the Mueller Report described the efforts by Trump and those around him to obstruct justice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Uri Berliner, an editor at NPR, revealed the bias of the left wing media in his piece earlier this week.
[…]

Good old workin’ the ref.

Poor Republicans. You guys keep finding out that reality has a liberal bias and it makes you so mad.

You clearly did not read his piece if this is your take away.

No, I read it alright. He’s working the refs and he doesn’t live in reality. For example, as another PP pointed out, the Trump campaign really did work with Russia. When the far right claimed “lab leak!” they did so without any evidence and from a place of not only racism, but a place that then vacated their agency to act responsibly in regards to preventing infection. Kind of like someone who sleeps around without protection and without getting tested.

And you’re so siloed that you don’t understand any of this because you don’t consume NPR, you consume OAN and Fox. Your only brush with NPR - which, BTW, has tilted as far right as every other allegedly “neutral” outlet - is this article and the podcast with Bari Weiss and the right wing’s obsessive hatred of public media. So forgive the rest of us for disagreeing with one nutjob right winger’s take.

Uri Berliner is NOT right wing. At all. You bet he is.

The whole Russian collusion story was a hoax started by the DNC and Hillary Clinton. That, my dear, is fact. No, my darling, it is not.

And, the claim of the lab leak was based on SCIENCE. The fact that no bats were within flying distance of the wet market was one piece of science. Then, there was the video of the lab worker that was censored by China. It wasn’t based on science, at least not at the time. You don’t seem to understand that wet markets bring in animals from a pretty wide area, that people actually do travel. It was an argument grounded solely in the GOP’s hatred of Asian people.
I cannot believe you are crying racism. That is rich.

As I said, you’re so siloed you don’t even know what you don’t know. As much as I think NPR is centrist-right wing trash, you’d be a thousand times better informed if you listened or read them.