Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates

[Anonymous]

Well, I'm sure Andrew is thrilled that the focus is so firmly off him.

I wish M and H had talked about how that situation is going down in the Firm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I used to be team Queen but this stuff is bad. No security or title for Archie? Cutting off security for them in Canada. It is like they are hoping something bad happens to them like Diana. This is horrible. I was thinking she was being petty about Kate. The security thing is what is really showing how awful the crown is

+1

There is no purpose to removing their security other than getting them killed.

Diana lost her protection officers and drivers in the divorce and was killed within 12 months.

Whoa. That's right.

Because she chose to climb into a car driven by a drunk driver without wearing her seatbelt.

The only survivor...wore his seatbelt

Untrue. It was determined that none of them were wearing seatbelts. That was just an initial rumor.

This is a false assertion. There was an inquest over Diana’s death, and it was determined that not only was her bodyguard wearing a seatbelt - something he usually didn’t do in order to be free to bodyguard, but he had engaged his belt likely out of alarm for the erratic driving of Fayed’s bodyguard who was at the wheel - likely his wearing his belt lessened the impact of Diana’s body by keeping him in place - it’s all down to the physics of auto crashes and how unrestrained bodies move in a crash, but the long and short is that Diana suffered only a few broken bones and her injuries would have been entirely survivable except that the rapid motion of her unrestrained body causes a tear to a tiny vein in one of her lungs and she bled out internally. Had she worn her belt, she would be alive today.

Seatbelts give you room to live. It is colossally stupid not to wear them.

[Anonymous]

I thought it was interesting how she didn't receive training on how to act "royal." For some reason, I just assumed that anyone marrying into the royal family would receive this training, if for no other reason than to avoid embarrassment for the royal family. Most people wouldn't know how to act according to centuries-old protocol.

[Anonymous]

I thought it was hurtful the manner in which she announced actually getting married 3 days before the wedding. It was like "In your face, fans! You've been duped. The wedding was just a farce to appease you." She doesn't deserve the admiration and attention of royal family supporters.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was hurtful the manner in which she announced actually getting married 3 days before the wedding. It was like "In your face, fans! You've been duped. The wedding was just a farce to appease you." She doesn't deserve the admiration and attention of royal family supporters.

I thought her use of the word "union" in that comment was odd. Seems rather business-like.

[Anonymous]

Where is the sister in all of this? Why is she so quiet now? Did she get paid off?

[Anonymous]

Wondering if Meghan knew about Harry dressing up in the Nazi uniform in 2012?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I thought it was hurtful the manner in which she announced actually getting married 3 days before the wedding. It was like "In your face, fans! You've been duped. The wedding was just a farce to appease you." She doesn't deserve the admiration and attention of royal family supporters.

Really? I thought it was nice for them to have a private moment before the big shebang. It probably took the edge off.

[Anonymous]

It really is puzzling as to why this thread is so negative toward the couple when the rest of the social media I see is so positive towards them, except of course the British tabloids. It makes you go, hmmmmm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The most shocking statement Kate said, to my mind, was that she did zero research or investigations on what it meant to marry into the Royal Family. I’m flabbergasted. I’m shocked she knew so little and didn’t bother reading up.

I don't know if I even believe this. But if it's true, it's her and Harry's own dumb fault. Kate knew exactly what she was walking into and William took great pains to make sure she was doing it with her eyes wide open. It can be done.

It’s not believable at all.

So you are saying it’s not true but if it is then it’s her fault.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Questions: What was the point of this interview? What was their objective? Did they achieve it?

Getting people who only want to be enraged on their side? Seems to have worked, when it comes to ignorant Americans who only see the racism (which was there) but know nothing about royal security, titles, etc so they don’t see through their lies on any of that.

Exactly. The title protocol has been explained multiple times in this thread, and there are still posts buying the idea that Archie was discriminated against.

It's been explained multiple times, many of those explanations wrong and all of them omitting key context.

All that matters is that Archie would never be considered a prince, regardless of his race.

Great grandchildren do NOT get titles unless they are the children of the Prince of Wales. Period. Archie was not singled out, this isn’t some unusual exception or deviation from protocol. Meghan knows this and yet she still goes on about it. This confirms she’s got an agenda and is just a grifter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did anyone catch Meg saying “I gave up my career!” But then Harry mentioning his family wanted her to keep acting?

Yep...they wanted her to keep acting so she could pay for security.

Because the taxpayers pay for their security.

This is a really important point that no one seems to be mentioning.

This is while they were still working royals.

Really the BRF has no defense if any of this is true. They cut Meghan's security while they were working and removed Archie from the line of succession. Look at Andrew- he's a spare and his kids are princesses.

They didn’t exclude Archie from a title - this is the protocol. Eugenie and Beatrice only got titles later in life, as older kids.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It really is puzzling as to why this thread is so negative toward the couple when the rest of the social media I see is so positive towards them, except of course the British tabloids. It makes you go, hmmmmm.

Not really if you have followed this forum and DCUM more broadly for long enough it makes perfect sense. Fits right in actually. White people love to be the arbiter of what is or isn't racist, people of color can never be right about the treatment they are receiving and experiencing, they are always lying until white people decide they aren't, which isn't often. See police brutality.

[Anonymous]

Found it very disrespectful they kept referring to her as Kate Middleton at the beginning of the interview. NO ONE calls her Kate in the family, only Catherine. It was a huge slap in the face. That's her tabloid name.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It really is puzzling as to why this thread is so negative toward the couple when the rest of the social media I see is so positive towards them, except of course the British tabloids. It makes you go, hmmmmm.

Not really if you have followed this forum and DCUM more broadly for long enough it makes perfect sense. Fits right in actually. White people love to be the arbiter of what is or isn't racist, people of color can never be right about the treatment they are receiving and experiencing, they are always lying until white people decide they aren't, which isn't often. See police brutality.

Preach. It's laughable that even when other white women call them out on it, they close ranks and say "you are part of the problem by stereotyping people as racist". Waaahhhh... So transparent.

Also, look at how many women on this forum are in loveless marriages. They can't believe Harry loves Meghan without it being the result of some master manipulation on her part.