|
The documents posted on the agenda for tomorrow's Board of Education Business Meeting includes an update on the Choice Study report and the MCPS response to it. I found the sections on the gifted centers to be interesting, especially the following:
1) "As of July 1, 2017, the Center Programs for the Highly Gifted now will be called the Centers for Enriched Studies, labeling curriculum and not students. [As was announced previously], there will be both regional centers at Lucy V. Barnsley, Clearspring, Cold Spring, Dr. Charles R. Drew, Fox Chapel, Oak View, and Pine Crest elementary schools; and local centers at Spark M. Matsunaga, Piney Branch, and Stonegate elementary schools. 2) The pilot process used to identify students for testing for HGC admission this year will expand next year to all schools. This takes away the need for parents to apply for their kids, and a central review process will identify students. Parents can still opt in or out of testing. 3) They claim to be working on adding better enrichment at local schools: "Schools with significant numbers of highly able students will receive support from staff in the Office of Curriculum and Instructional Programs on programing for students who need enriched or accelerated instruction. All 39 schools in the field test will receive information about the programmatic needs of their students with additional support being given to schools that evidenced significant numbers of students who could benefit from enriched and accelerated instruction." 4) There will be changes made to the application process for the middle and high school magnets, but those aren't yet determined: "It is anticipated that a field test will be conducted during the 2017–2018 school year selection process. Learnings from both the elementary school model and the middle school field test will determine any programmatic changes considered for the 2018–2019 school year, looking first at the middle schools and then at the high schools. Staff will continue to consult with experts and practitioners to identify best practices, effective models, and possible obstacles. This work will continue to build toward a coherent articulation model that supports students from elementary school through graduation." There's also some interesting info about the new Two-Way Spanish Immersion programs at two local schools. As the parent of a student who went through the HGC application at a pilot school this year, I think that especially change #2 (and maybe #3, if they go about it in a similar way) is a good thing. It opens the application pool wider, but still requires students to take an assessment and meet requirements to be accepted. Document is here: http://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/ALXLAU4F2C1A/$file/Choice%20Study%20Update.pdf |
| Thank you for the summary! This all sound s like good news. |
| Chevy Chase is missing from the list. Are they losing their center? |
That's not mentioned at all and there has been no indication of that, so I bet it is just a typo in the report, particularly since they talk a lot about expanding access. Removing a center would require more explanation, I would think! |
| Yay for 2 way immersion! It values what non-English speakers can bring to schools! We should view these kids as a tremendous resource, not a burden as non-english speakers are often viewed! |
Yes! |
Maybe they are doing away with it. There's mention that they want kids to be real "outliers" at their school. Most of the schools that feed into the current Chevy Chase HGC have huge groups of highly able students at their schools. |
It's a great idea. |
| The name change is confusing. Centers for Enriched Studies, eh? I guess that means it's no longer for gifted kids but kids the teachers like? |
| I'm just happy that my magnet kids are almost done with MCPS. |
I think that the name change is an improvement. This "Highly Gifted" thing was nonsense (and both of my kids were at the HGC). Though "Centers for Enriched Studies" does unfortunately imply that the home schools are centers for impoverished studies. But if the BoE said, "Oh yeah, well, then, what do you think they should be called?" I wouldn't have a better suggestion. |
| ^^^Actually I think that all of the changes sound promising. |
| Is there any change on selection transparency? MCPS seems to withhold more information regarding how the decisions were made this year than previous years. |
If they cost more money, they are a burden. No other country gives free lessons like the US does. You just immerse and get grades or you learn the language before starting school there. |
Actually most of the kids the teachers don't like get recommended. It's nice to get rid of the annoying overbearing kids for 4/5th grade. |