FCV parents - has anyone heard anything?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

These rankings aren't meaningful, especially with regard to DA clubs.

Care to elaborate why you think that?

[Anonymous]

Meeting is today. We’ll know more by the end of the day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

These rankings aren't meaningful, especially with regard to DA clubs.

Because DA clubs do not participate in the ranky dank "holiday" tournaments that contribute to the rankings. You win some August Cup lame tournament - you get points that help boost rankings. DA did not participate in neighborhood tourny's

Care to elaborate why you think that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

These rankings aren't meaningful, especially with regard to DA clubs.

Because DA clubs do not participate in the ranky dank "holiday" tournaments that contribute to the rankings. You win some August Cup lame tournament - you get points that help boost rankings. DA did not participate in neighborhood tourny's

Care to elaborate why you think that?

If that's you're response, then I think you misread the rankings. GotSoccer "rankings" may use all the "holiday" tournaments that you referred to above, but not Youth Soccer Rankings. It only takes into account the teams you actually played and their relative strengths (based on their results). It's not perfect, but much better that GotSoccer, and gives you a good idea of strong/weak teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

These rankings aren't meaningful, especially with regard to DA clubs.

It’s the same ranking that Arlington 04 Dad was bragging about.


Because DA clubs do not participate in the ranky dank "holiday" tournaments that contribute to the rankings. You win some August Cup lame tournament - you get points that help boost rankings. DA did not participate in neighborhood tourny's

Care to elaborate why you think that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

LOL. Exactly. These rankings should be printed on toilet paper. Why anyone uses them to make points here is beyond most people who have been around the block in youth soccer.

This is likely the 2007G Loudoun parent of a first child......again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

Not a Loudoun parent, but curious on which teams below them that you think are better? Being a "bad" team in a top league doesn't always mean you are a "bad" team compared to greater pool of teams... Just that the others in that league are better.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

LOL. Exactly. These rankings should be printed on toilet paper. Why anyone uses them to make points here is beyond most people who have been around the block in youth soccer.

This is likely the 2007G Loudoun parent of a first child......again.

Why are you bringing up any 2007s when this is about the 2004s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

LOL. Exactly. These rankings should be printed on toilet paper. Why anyone uses them to make points here is beyond most people who have been around the block in youth soccer.

This is likely the 2007G Loudoun parent of a first child......again.

Why are you bringing up any 2007s when this is about the 2004s?

Because a 2004 parent should know better, even if it's their first child.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is likely the 2007G Loudoun parent of a first child......again.

Oh God! Does it get any worse than those people?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

Not a Loudoun parent, but curious on which teams below them that you think are better? Being a "bad" team in a top league doesn't always mean you are a "bad" team compared to greater pool of teams... Just that the others in that league are better.

When the North East Conference qualifies 5 teams in the champions league and the mid Atlantic only qualifies 2 and one is Richmond, no, the Mid Atlantic is not a power house conference. Loudoun 04 is a poor performing team in a mediocre conference. But hey, you’re ECNL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

Dude, you need to break out your kids math books and learn how to count. Last 10 games they have 7 wins and 3 ties.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If we’re talking about 04 girls, according to Youth Soccer Rankings

1 Richmond United
2 FCV
3 VDA
4 Arlington
5 Loudoun
6 Mclean
7 BRYC
[9-23 include FCV’s second team, Arlington’s second team, Herndon, Great Falls’ NPL team . . . ]

24 Metro United

Imagine how meaningful those rankings are when you’re ranked 5th in the state and you’ve won 6 out of 20 games. Loudoun is a true power house.

Not a Loudoun parent, but curious on which teams below them that you think are better? Being a "bad" team in a top league doesn't always mean you are a "bad" team compared to greater pool of teams... Just that the others in that league are better.

Well finding teams below Loudoun who I think are better is a pretty short list, but there ARE many teams above them though.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is likely the 2007G Loudoun parent of a first child......again.

Oh God! Does it get any worse than those people?!?

It really doesn't. Let's see how they age up.